Oct-21-24 Nakamura vs Onischuk, 2017
|
paulthebox: Onichuk surely won the opening but 27… Qf4 allowed Naka some nasty tactics. Instead 27… gxf5 28. Nf3 Qg6 29. Nxh2 fxg4+ 30. Ka1 Rxh2 would have been a strong exchange sac. White could have played 31. d5! as after 31… cxd5? 32. Qe5 the double threat 33. Qxh2 and 33. Nb5 Rc8 ... |
|
|
|
Sep-10-24 Gulko vs Short, 1995
|
paulthebox: Instructive pawn ending. 53. Kg2 is the only move that draws. After 53. Kf4? there woukd have been only one winning move, 53… Ke7. |
|
|
|
Aug-20-23 N Abasov vs Carlsen, 2023 
|
paulthebox: 57. Bg4! don’t think I’ve ever seen this motive! |
|
|
|
Apr-25-22 A Yusupov vs Short, 1995
|
paulthebox: Interesting was 18. Nxf7 Bb7 (now the knight is cut off from its base, however ...) 19. Nd8! Rxd8 20. Rc7 but according to engine this will end in draw by perpetual |
|
|
|
Apr-05-21 Sveshnikov vs Tukmakov, 1984
|
paulthebox: It seems 52... Be7, leaving the knight stranded, would have won: 53. Ke5 Kf7 and now a) 54. Kf4 Kf6 b) 54. Na5 Bd8! 55. Nc4 Bc7+ 56. Kd4 Kf6 -+ c) 54. h6 Kg6 55. Kxe6 f4 -+. With the BK on h6 (as in 53... Kh6 54. Kxe6 f4) white would draw with Kxe7 f3; Nd6! f3; Nf5+ and Ne3 thus ... |
|
|
|
Mar-14-21 Timman vs Miles, 1984
|
paulthebox: Fascinating double rook endgame. Black looks to be winning easily after 1st time control with an extra pawn, rooks doubled on 7th row and connected passed pawns yet Timman manages to draw. Miles must have regretted not eliminating white’s a-pawn on move 49; after that it ... |
|
|
|
Mar-03-21 Andersson vs Polugaevsky, 1984 
|
paulthebox: The rook manoeuvre Rf1-e1-e2xb2-b1-a1 (behind pawn a2) does not impress, no wonder Andersson soon found himself in a bad position. |
|
|
|
Mar-03-21 Andersson vs Chandler, 1984
|
paulthebox: Anderssons delay in capturing b7 cost him dearly. After 32. Rxb7 the line given by Chandler Rxb7 33. Rxb7 Bc5 “with counterplay” is not convincing due to 34. Bd5. |
|
|
|
Dec-22-20 L Vogt vs Gheorghiu, 1984 
|
paulthebox: The immediate 25. Bh8 Bf8 26. Rg7+ Kxh8 28. Rxg6+ fails to e5!; the meaning of 25. f5 is thus to eliminate that resource (gxf5 26. Bh8 Bf8 27. Rxf5!). |
|
|
|
Dec-12-20 Chandler vs Timman, 1984
|
paulthebox: Wild game, 31, Ne4 is a shocker (31... dxe4 32. Qf6+ Ke8 33. Qd8+!! with unexpected mate) but Timman finds a worthy reply 31... Rh7! |
|
|
|
Dec-08-20 Timman vs Andersson, 1984 
Sep-15-20 Nunn vs K Mokry, 1983
Apr-26-20 Spassky vs Taimanov, 1955 
Apr-11-20 W J Muhring vs G Thomas, 1946 
Apr-03-20 P Nikolic vs Andersson, 1984
Mar-25-20 McShane vs Radjabov, 2012 
Feb-23-20 C Kottnauer vs Kotov, 1946
Feb-22-20 H Steiner vs Botvinnik, 1946
Feb-15-20 Karpov vs Korchnoi, 1984 
Feb-15-20 Timman vs Spassky, 1981 
Feb-08-20 Polugaevsky vs Quinteros, 1985 
Feb-08-20 J H Donner vs Najdorf, 1961
Feb-04-20 Browne vs D Gurevich, 1984
Jan-29-20 Botvinnik vs Flohr, 1946 
Dec-10-19 I Novikov vs Tukmakov, 1984 
Nov-29-19 H Bogdanor vs B Goulding Brown, 1914 
Nov-26-19 Kotov vs Gligoric, 1952 
Nov-10-19 Euwe vs Alekhine, 1937
Nov-02-19 Smyslov vs C Zhu, 2001 
Oct-12-19 M Yilmazyerli vs B Sadiku, 2017 
Sep-22-19 W Ju vs Goryachkina, 2019 
Jul-28-19 Timman vs B Ivanovic, 1984 
Jul-13-19 Ljubojevic vs Karpov, 1986
Jul-13-19 Ljubojevic vs Karpov, 1980
Jan-28-19 Ding Liren vs Anand, 2019
Jan-28-19 Seirawan vs Lobron, 1983 
Jan-22-19 J Saksis vs Shirov, 1985 
Jun-17-18 Hitech vs REBEL, 1986 
Jun-17-18 Tal vs Gligoric, 1984
Jun-11-18 Smyslov vs Kasparov, 1984 
Oct-08-17 Korchnoi vs Timman, 1982 
Sep-23-17 Kupchik vs Capablanca, 1926 
|