Jan-09-08 Capablanca vs R Raubitschek, 1906 
|
Economics357: How about 32. RfB5?
Hmm, a7 looks kinda weak. Let's see -- 32.Ra5? Qf4+! draws by perpetual. Deflection with 32.Rd5? Qf4+ draws again. What about 32.Qxa7+ Qxa7 33.Ra5? Looks mighty crunchy -- 33...Qxa6 34.Rxa6 is mate, and 33...Rb7 34.cxb7+ Kb8 35.Qxa7# just delays the ... |
|
|
|
indicates a reply to the comment. |
|