Sep-06-06 Capablanca vs Vidmar, 1929 
|
Heathen Tory: 'quod erat demonstrandum' is the correct spelling. In any case, its usage in the above context is inappropriate. It may have been the user had intended to astound other members with his knowledge of classical languages. If this is the case then the only 'thing' that was proved ... |
|
|
|
Sep-04-06 chessgames.com chessforum 
|
Heathen Tory: <Ode to the Spell Checker>
....
(Sauce unknown) |
|
|
|
Sep-01-06 Oll vs Azmaiparashvili, 1993 
|
Heathen Tory: Oll he had to do was Lembit have it. Sorry I have bit of a cold at present. |
|
|
|
Sep-01-06 The World vs A Nickel, 2006 
|
Heathen Tory: The White team is like an oil tanker:- difficult to steer, full of gas and vulnerable to a lone more maneuverable predator submarine. One well placed torpedo will ignite its cargo in a pandemonium
of indecision, especially when it ventures onto the high seas of the ... |
|
|
|
Aug-28-06 Petrosian vs B Ivanovic, 1972
|
Heathen Tory: Thanks for that <Honza> - I must say the phrase does seem to have a touch of Tartakower to it! |
|
|
|
Aug-26-06 YouRang chessforum 
|
Heathen Tory: <Other opinions are offered by people who dispense with thought in favor of sarcastic mocking...> If you re-visit the sequence of posts above you may find that not only did the 'dispensation of thought' preceed the 'sarcastic mocking' - it quite naturally invited it. |
|
|
|
Aug-25-06 Bobby Fischer 
indicates a reply to the comment. |
|