Hunter16 has kibitzed 26 times to chessgames   [more...]

Mar-11-18 World Championship Candidates (2018)    Hunter16: Will be interesting to see how Kramnik continues,and especially how he fares against the young guns.If he wins the Candidates,the WC will receive a lot of hype,Kramnik vs. Carlsen would be a great event.      Jun-11-17 Aronian vs Carlsen, 2017    Hunter16: Interesting game,but can you really call this a "brilliancy"?Credit to Aronian,but Black could have saved this if he hadn't dropped his queen into that messy corner of the board.Thoughts,everyone?      May-13-17 So vs Carlsen, 2017    Hunter16: Head-to-head records don't necessarily determine the better player unless they're crushing.      Nov-21-16 Carlsen vs Karjakin, 2016    Hunter16: Karjakin got Magnus on the counter attack,which I suspect has been his plan all along.However,write Carlsen off at your own peril.He's not going the highest rating ever for nothing.      Nov-15-16 Karjakin vs Carlsen, 2016    Hunter16: 91..f3. Wouldn't this be a blunder?The knight forks with Ne3+.      Nov-14-16 Carlsen vs Karjakin, 2016    Hunter16: Without a computer analysis,I'd take a guess and say that this was slightly better for white.Karjakin is extremely well prepared.But I think we'll see something interesting in Game 4.      Nov-13-16 Karjakin vs Carlsen, 2016    Hunter16: Hmm.....I think the champion and the challenger are both getting a taste of each other.A Sicilian would've been a more dynamic choice though.Expect fireworks in Game 4.      Nov-12-16 Carlsen vs Karjakin, 2016    Hunter16: I think this is a good result for Karjakin,because GMs usually prefer white.Carlsen should go for e4 because I think he's better suited to breaking open lines like the Caro.The Trompovsky is an interesting choice to kick a WC match off though.      Nov-03-16 J Rosanes vs Anderssen, 1863    Hunter16: Can anyone tell me if 21...B×d4 also wins? Thank you.      Aug-08-16 Nimzowitsch vs Systemsson, 1927    Hunter16: Can anyone explain what overprotection actually means?All I know is that it's the concept of defending an important square or piece to discourage attacks against with the hope of a long term advantage.Am I right?Do correct me if needed,thanks.

indicates a reply to the comment.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com. If you need an account, register now; it's quick, anonymous, and free! If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.