Komski: I don't quite understand Naka's fan. One thing they say makes common sense until they say: that Naka is on par with "Pillsbury and Reshevsky." imo, that is delusional (Naka hasn't played long enough to make a proper comparison). I want to know what shams and frogbert think of that? ...
indicates a reply to the comment.
You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.
Kibitzing
