Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing User Profile

Member since Sep-26-08 · Last seen Jul-11-20
I'm a class A player with the USCF (~1840). But in 2006 I was class D (~1300) before I started taking lessons with NM Dan Heisman.

I've been coming to this site for quite a while and I believe it has helped me to better my analysis skills. It is very insightful to read posts by some of my favorite kibitzers: <johnlspouge> (was he kidnapped?), <dzechiel>, <TheaN>, <CHESSTTCAMPS>, <agb2002>, <gofer>, and of course <Once>, and other kibitzer "greats". My appreciation goes to them for helping me reach a higher level.

My thoughts on improvement have changed recently. I used to be dead set against helpmate problems which I thought teaches you the bad habit of expecting your opponent to make a bad move. Too much of anything is bad, but this has the positive of training piece coordination which is a very powerful skill to have. Here's another example: My coach showed me a few problems where you must force immediate checkmate by swapping any two pieces on the board, resulting in a legal checkmate position. For example, you can't swap a piece and a pawn if the pawn is on the 8th rank or checks your own king--that's not a legal position. There are many ways to improve key areas in chess.

If anyone wishes to critique my analysis or ideas, feel free to do so. I won't take it personally. I need feedback! Or if you want opinions on improvement, feel free to ask.

   Patriot has kibitzed 4009 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Apr-16-20 Szabo vs T van Scheltinga, 1947
Patriot: <thegoodanarchist> <I got an "8"> LOL. Yes it's a preference. There is just something cool about putting the knight on the rim and winning! It doesn't happen often so when the opportunity presents itself...
   Jan-31-20 B Predojevic vs D Andreikin, 2016 (replies)
Patriot: 36.Re2! One of the coolest moves I've seen for a while.
   Dec-30-19 Degraeve vs R Pogorelov, 1992 (replies)
Patriot: <TheaN> <Now on the second to last day of 2019, it's still far from Very Easy. The idea of <57.Ra5> is clear, but hell no that it's very easy after 57....g2 58.Rxe5+ Kf6! keeping the rook en prise, threatening g1=Q and if necessary Rh8 or Rb2. Yes, Black does lose the
   Dec-30-19 B Adhiban vs Wei Yi, 2015 (replies)
Patriot: <jith1207> But garbage or not, as long as he is a paying customer then who cares what is posted? Personally I wouldn't allow it if I were admin. Enough is enough.
   Dec-19-19 N Kopaev vs Alatortsev, 1938 (replies)
Patriot: <<patzer2>: I missed on today's (33. ?) Thursday puzzle. I stopped calculating the 33. Qxh6+! line and gave up on it after 33. Qxh6! gxh6 34. g7+ Kg8 35. gxf8Q+ Kxf8, because I didn't look ahead one more move to see 36. Rxd8+ +-.> I may have done that also at first. It's
   Dec-10-19 K Treybal vs J Engel, 1932
Patriot: I saw the possibilty of 33.Nxh6 Nxh6 34.Qe3, but thought white could get more out of this. Then I found 33.Ng3, preparing 34.Ne4 and forking Rc5 and f6 (which is a fork of Qd7 and h7). It's like a game of Hopscotch at that point. 33.Ng3 Ng5 34.Qg6 I think.
   Nov-27-19 C Kottnauer vs Kotov, 1946 (replies)
Patriot: I also went with 23.Nxe6 - it's a simple win. No matter how black recaptures, white always regains material with an attack.
   Nov-26-19 Prins vs E Paoli, 1949 (replies)
Patriot: This is definitely a positional problem. The only tactical elements I saw were the Bf3-Qg7 and the loose Na5. Freeing the horrible Bc1 (which amounts to a pawn) and perhaps somehow taking advantage of the Bf3-Qg7 line seems good. One idea I had was 22.g4, 23.Nf5, Bg2, and f4. The ...
   Jun-23-19 J Gunnarsson vs J L Hammer, 2009 (replies)
Patriot: [DIAGRAM] 24...Bh4 25. Rxe2 Rc1+ 26. Re1 Rxe1+ 27. Qxe1 Bxe1 28. Bxf8 Kxf8 29. Rd8+ Ke7 30. Rb8 Bxb4 31. Rxb5 Somehow the computer is saying this evaluates to +0.95. Black is up a pawn for the exchange which seems more like -0.25.
   Jun-06-19 J Bentley vs S Tavares, 2018 (replies)
Patriot: <agb2002> <Curiously, I never considered 27.Rxe8+ Qxe8 28.Qxd7. I saw 27.Qf4 quickly and didn't bother to look for a better alternative. I should fix this old bad habit.> "Look wide before you look deep." That's the advice my instructor would give me. But you're a damn ...
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

You are not logged in to
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2020, Chessgames Services LLC