Nov-02-04 H Seyboth vs Luetze, 1902 
|
PawnBlock: There is such beauty in simplicity! |
|
|
|
Sep-09-04 Karpov vs Csom, 1977 
|
PawnBlock: <acirce>, <Gypsy>: I did miss Nh4- good call! |
|
|
|
Sep-09-04 C F Tears vs G Flum, 1965
|
PawnBlock: <doreshk>: I did mean Bd4, of course, sorry for noting that wrong. The Q-side penetration via Qa3 is not to be thrown out of consideration for sure. However, given that W has chances to Q the e-pawn I felt it was stronger for B to have the option of sacing his Q for the ... |
|
|
|
Aug-31-04 D Minic vs V Bukal Sr, 1972 
|
PawnBlock: I liked 25. fxe3, I expected to see the R drop to retake (keeping pawns together. But the strength of that R on the 7th worth much more than worry over an iso. |
|
|
|
Aug-27-04 G Barbero vs U Rueetschi, 1987 
|
PawnBlock: <Dres1> on the chessgames.com homepage where you can enter players names, or opening to search for. There is a box you can check called "with Kibitzing" in the lower-right of that section (directly above the [Find Chess Games!] button). That will net you games with ... |
|
|
|
Aug-27-04 Blackburne vs Leverson, 1885 
|
PawnBlock: <Dres1> on the chessgames.com homepage where you can enter players names, or opening to search for. There is a box you can check called "with Kibitzing" in the lower-right of that section (directly above the [Find Chess Games!] button). That will net you games with ... |
|
|
|
Aug-26-04 Larsen vs P Ravn, 1952
|
PawnBlock: Oops, I do mean Edgar, <Shah Mat>, funny cuz I THOUGHT "edgar" when I typed it. *sigh* |
|
|
|
Aug-26-04 Anand vs I Morovic Fernandez, 2004 
|
PawnBlock: I don't see anything wrong per se' with the lines stemming from 18. Qxc6 (as posted), but I might suggest that W didn't want B's Q to centralize and come to the defense (Qd5 or the like). Given the uncoordinated R's and Bi, B's likeliest savior would be the lady; especially if he ... |
|
|
|
Aug-25-04 J Belson vs R E Martin, 1933 
|
PawnBlock: <sanferrera>: on 20...Nf6 21. Qh6 Rg8? 22. Qg8+ Rxg8 23. Rxg8#. Rook could take first too, but Q-sac's are always so exciting . . . |
|
|
|
Aug-20-04 Pirc vs Spielmann, 1931 
|
PawnBlock: Nice thought about the pin on move 29. There is a tactical problem with it though- W loses protection for the R on e1. So: 29. Qxe5? Qxe1+ 30. Kg2 Qf1# I don't understand the point of 13. Rfe1. There doesn't seem to be immediate hope of opening the e-file and that R would have ... |
|
|
|
indicates a reply to the comment. |
|