Apr-28-16 Aronian vs Carlsen, 2016 
|
Progman: Get this MVL-Carlsen dejavu already |
|
|
|
Dec-07-15 London Chess Classic (2015) 
|
Progman: That is some fortress. Even Magnus at 2880+ wouldn't be able to squeeze anything out of this. |
|
|
|
Feb-10-15 Carlsen vs Naiditsch, 2015 
|
Progman: 15. Qxa6... I guess a sac against Naiditsch was bound to pay off sooner or later :-) |
|
|
|
Feb-10-15 Carlsen vs Bacrot, 2015
|
Progman: Interesting how Carlsen butchered himself after the game. He called the Nxa7 "insane", and on Norwegian television he promptly labeled his play as a sign of "cerebral hemorrhage". A bit harsh if you ask me... Actually the engines still gave Carlsen a significant advantage if he had ... |
|
|
|
Feb-10-15 Magnus Carlsen 
|
Progman: <Carlsen can barely beat a 2700. Shows how overrated he really is.> Yes, Carlsen is a patzer with 20 out of 30 super tournament wins since fall 2009 (23 in all) and holder of all three world titles. Total loser. Highly overrated. |
|
|
|
Feb-10-15 GRENKE Chess Classic (2015) 
|
Progman: <specifically in terms of endgame play, when compared to other supertournament final rounds in recent memory, which is somewhat surprising as fatigue is probably not a big factor on a small field of eight> Perhaps some of them hadn't managed to get Tata completely out of their |
|
|
|
Jan-21-15 Tata Steel Masters (2015) 
|
Progman: can't Ding just take the rook`? |
|
|
|
Nov-15-14 Carlsen - Anand World Championship Match (2014) 
|
Progman: Back to back blunders for some reason seem to pop up in high level chess. Perhaps because one doesn't expect gifts (as Anand stated in the press conference)? One overlooks the blatantly obvious whilst being too busy calculating long lines based on a set position? I don't know. Apart |
|
|
|
Feb-04-14 Zurich Chess Challenge (Rapid) (2014) 
|
Progman: Haha, Carlsen wanted that trophy in a @#$%*!& hurry and take the first flight home. |
|
|
|
Feb-04-14 Zurich Chess Challenge (2014) 
|
Progman: Aronian - Carlsen: rapid games takes the term "time trouble" to a whole new level :-) |
|
|
|
indicates a reply to the comment. |
|