May-14-06 Benko vs M Vukcevich, 1969 
|
Quant: What if after 21. h3 Rae8 22. Nf3 ...
Seems winning to me. |
|
|
|
May-14-06 Radjabov vs M Bluvshtein, 1997 
|
Quant: 18. Qc4+ Qf7 19. Qxf7+ Kxf7 20. Bxc5 bxc5 21. Rd6+ ...
What am I missing? Is it really resignable? |
|
|
|
Mar-11-06 R Balinas vs Korchnoi, 1968 
|
Quant: How is 28. ... Be5 refuted? |
|
|
|
Mar-09-06 C Lutz vs Ftacnik, 2001 
|
Quant: How about 32. Be6? It is not as forcing as the line played but might be more aesthetically pleasing. |
|
|
|
Jan-09-06 A J Goldsby 
|
Quant: <cg.com> I demand you close A.J.'s (A Joke?) account. The link provided by aw1988 shows clear evidence that we are dealing with a malicious and socially retarded individual. His view on people with different sexual orientation is Hitlerian in it's vileness. Please act swiftly. |
|
|
|
Dec-16-05 Anna Iodo 
|
Quant: <cus>
1. I have read them correctly so stop going berserk. You said <somehow it's sad but somehow it isn't>. If it ain't sad, then what is it? 2. May peace be with you, brother.
3. Seneca did not walk his talk. I really have no respect for people who teach about ... |
|
|
|
Oct-17-05 Veselin Topalov 
|
Quant: <csmath> Obviously, I am one of those stupid "probabilists" (a CS student, in fact). My solution to your problem is as follows: 0.4 x 0.4 (he wins both games) +
0.4 x 0.5 x 0.8 x 2 (he wins one game, draws the other one plus the other guys draw their game as well) =
48%.
It ... |
|
|
|
Aug-10-05 Alan Turing 
|
Quant: <Robin01> a wheel perhaps? |
|
|
|
Jul-20-05 Shabalov vs Bologan, 2005 
|
Quant: wtf is wrong with 49. b8=Q? It seems that white had a decent advantage. |
|
|
|
May-27-05 Marjanovic vs M Vukic, 1980 
|
Quant: I would like to ask chessgames.com whether there is a forced win at all? I spent some time considering Bf3 but rejected it as there was no obvious win. Frankly, after checking the line with crafty I feel a bit fooled. What is the point in solving tactical problems that are inherently ... |
|
|
|
indicates a reply to the comment. |
|