Sep-17-25 G Stoltz vs A Nimzowitsch, 1934 
| |
| Stolzenberg: A ♘ on the rim is dim. It seems, that <14. Nh4> was somehow questionable. Perhaps simply 14. Rad1 instead. |
|
|
|
Sep-12-25 Flohr vs G Stoltz, 1935
| |
| Stolzenberg: Perhaps better 14. ... Be4. |
|
|
|
Sep-10-25 H Hahlbohm vs Ed Lasker, 1918
| |
| Stolzenberg: After <35. ... Rd2> Black threatened 36. ... Bxg2+ 37. Ke1/Kg1 Nf3#. Nice mate patterns with ♖, ♗ and ♘. |
|
|
|
Sep-06-25 E R Perry vs S Mlotkowski, 1918
| |
| Stolzenberg: 5. ... Bg4 = H Rossetto vs S Johannessen, 1962 |
|
|
|
Sep-05-25 Kupchik vs Capablanca, 1913
| |
| Stolzenberg: <kingscrusher and fredthebear: Capablanca's accuracy>: 30. ... Na4 was the last move before the time control. Perhaps Capablanca was in time trouble which could explain his inaccuracy. |
|
|
|
Aug-24-25 Levenfish vs Teichmann, 1911
| |
| Stolzenberg: The careless move 13. ... Nbd7? would be answered with 14. Rxd6 Kxd6 15. Nxf7+ Ke7 16. Nxh8. |
|
|
|
Aug-24-25 Queen's Gambit Accepted, Classical (D27)
| |
| Stolzenberg: <7. dxc5> became popular in the recent past, but after 7. ... Qxd1 8. Rxd1 Bxc5 the solid continuation 9. a3 proved to be a little harmless, as many games ended in draws, some of them very quickly. Instead 9. Nbd2, 9. Be2 or even 9. Nfd2 seem to be more promising. After ... |
|
|
|
Aug-20-25 Vidmar vs Duras, 1909
| |
| Stolzenberg: c7 proved not to be a safe square to the ♕. 12. ... 0-0 or 12. ... cxd4 are good alternatives. *****
Black lost a piece by <21. fxe7> and at the latest after <26. Rd2> it was time to resign. *****
40. ... Qxb3 41. Qh8+ Kf5 42. Nd6+ Kf4 43. Qf6# or 43. Qd4# ... |
|
|
|
Aug-19-25 Alapin vs von Popiel, 1899
| |
| Stolzenberg: 65. Rg4 = mate in 36 as per endgame database, for example 65. ... Rb2 66. b4 Rb3 67. b5 Kf6 68. Rg5 *****
<0-1 ??> 66. Rc3 = mate in 44, for example 66. ... Rb8 67. Kg3 Kd4 68. Rf3 |
|
|
|
Aug-18-25 von Popiel vs Pillsbury, 1902
| |
| Stolzenberg: Keres saw a white advantage after 12. 0-0-0. |
|
|
|
| indicates a reply to the comment. |
|
Kibitzing
