chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile

bachiller
Member since Oct-03-05 · Last seen May-25-20
no bio

   bachiller has kibitzed 110 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Jan-22-20 Tata Steel Challengers (2020) (replies)
 
bachiller: David Anton Guijarro has broken the barrier of the 2700 points in the live rating list. Congratulations! Enhorabuena, David.
 
   Oct-22-19 D Anton Guijarro vs R Hovhannisyan, 2019
 
bachiller: Certainly. His performance in IoM has been outstanding. We can resonably expect great results from him in the years to come.
 
   Oct-19-19 David Anton Guijarro (replies)
 
bachiller: David está en cabeza del torneo de la isla de Man (ex aequo con Caruana y Aronian) al cabo de 8 vueltas, con 4 victorias y 4 tablas. Espero que las últimas partidas mantengan esa línea. En todo caso, un torneo excelente. ˇAdelante, campeón!
 
   Oct-16-19 D Anton Guijarro vs Morozevich, 2014
 
bachiller: David outplayed Goliath.
 
   Oct-16-19 Lenderman vs D Anton Guijarro, 2019 (replies)
 
bachiller: Nice finish, including mate in the end, wich Lenderman allowed. He preferred to die young and leave a pretty corpse, rather than facing a helpless ending after 55.Rf1 Nf2+, 56.RxN RxR etc. Indeed, the fate of the white king seems to be sealed when the black rook invades, supported
 
   Feb-07-19 Opocensky vs J Hrdina, 1913 (replies)
 
bachiller: 19. White to move is an interesting puzzle, IMO.
 
   Jan-22-19 Tata Steel Masters (2019) (replies)
 
bachiller: Is today a rest day?
 
   Jan-16-19 Korchnoi vs J Silver, 1977 (replies)
 
bachiller: Silverado.
 
   Dec-29-18 Gulko vs A Kremenietsky, 1982 (replies)
 
bachiller: <am I the only one who feels that Kremenietsky could have ended this earlier and without sacrificing so many pieces?> He may have thought that Boris is worth a mess
 
   Jun-05-18 Louis Stumpers (replies)
 
bachiller: <Is the statement "0 is a natural number" true or false?> In a sense, we are free to name the first natural number as we prefer: 0 is a popular choice, and so is 1. On deeper inspection, I would declare 0 the winner, on the ground of Zermelo-Fraenkel axioms, where an ...
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2020, Chessgames Services LLC