Apr-02-18 M Zaloznyy vs J C Sadorra, 2018
| |
| bobbyperez: First mistake here was 6.Nh3!?(?!). The best theoretical move here was 6.Be2, though 6.Nh3!?(?!) deserves a try in rapid and blitz games. |
|
|
|
Apr-02-18 Mamedyarov vs Dreev, 2018
| |
| bobbyperez: His first mistake(Mamedyarov) was his 9thmove.He may have played e4(according to Stockfish). I saw the idea of the move 9.e4-to fix the e5-pawn and gain space, and in some cases, use d5 asan anchor for the knight, right? |
|
|
|
Dec-20-16 Letelier vs Fischer, 1960 
| |
bobbyperez: Let's analyze this!
If 24.Kf2 then 24...Nd4! 25.Qd3 Ng4+! 26.Kg2 Ne3+!  .The finish might be 26.Kg1 Nxf3+ 27.Kf2 Ne5+! Can you understand Descriptive?
If 24.K-B2 then 24...N-Q5! 25.Q-Q3 N-N5+! 26.K-N2 N-K6+! |
|
|
|
Nov-09-16 Tal vs M Neibults, 1959
| |
bobbyperez: Mayhem in the Morra-11.Bb5+!!N 11.axb5 12.Nxe5! dxe5 13.Nxb5!  Now white has a very strong attack on black's king. If only the bishop is on e7 and the K-Knight is not developed,it would have been good to play Bxe5! and then ... |
|
|
|
Oct-15-16 Spassky vs Fischer, 1972
| |
| bobbyperez: 39...e5! is the only way to seal the draw.
There was a debate that was happening between grandmasters if 36.Kg4 Ke5 37.Kh5's a draw. |
|
|
|
Aug-21-16 D Visanescu vs J M Frayna, 2016
| |
| bobbyperez: Frayna is not a theorist for me |
|
|
|
Aug-20-16 M Esserman vs J Sarkar, 2008
| |
| bobbyperez: but do not be against thhe morra. |
|
|
|
Aug-20-16 M Esserman vs J Sarkar, 2008
| |
| bobbyperez: nd5 sac is powerfully,incredibly,and undoubtly strong,actually in the killer smith-morra gambit! |
|
|
|
May-19-16 M Esserman vs Van Wely, 2011
| |
| bobbyperez: Sorry because esserman is the 4th master of morra!
The Masters of Mor-
ra
1.Morra
2.Matulovich(Matulovic)
3.Smith
4.Esserman |
|
|
|
Apr-09-16 Carlsen vs Adams, 2016
| |
| bobbyperez: That mistake is caused by the theory. |
|
|
|
| indicates a reply to the comment. |
|
Kibitzing
