Jun-24-05 E Tate vs T Braunlich, 2001 
|
bobscreech: Just for the sake of disputing that e5 is clearly winning, can't black just respond somewhat passivly with 13...Bb7? (developing the bishop, protecting the rook, attacking the white queen [which gives tempo for 0-0] which protects the King, and connects the rooks) Also, I think ... |
|
|
|
Aug-05-04 Anand vs Leko, 2004 
|
bobscreech: <Shah Mat> I agree, 14...Kh8 is certainly a blunder. Also 14...a6, though preventing the loss of the exchange, seems both a bit to passive and directs attention to the Queenside where white appears to have the upperhand. I would have to go with Be6 for several reasons. ... |
|
|
|
Dec-12-03 Korchnoi vs Huebner, 1973 
|
bobscreech: In this game Korchnoi played the 4. e4 an sound, yet uncommon line in the english opening. It is usually defered because it usually leads to less dynamic positions, the english opening's greatest asset. As you can see by move 14 HALF of the material has been exchanged. |
|
|
|
Aug-07-03 Pillsbury vs Lasker, 1896 
|
bobscreech: what is the point of 21.Bb5 |
|
|
|
|