chankins has kibitzed 7 times to chessgames

Jul-28-04 S Izbinsky vs Viakhirev, 1909    chankins: 36...Bd3 does win faster and makes more sense too. Why sac your queen to get material when you can just take it?      Feb-24-04 Linares (2004)    chankins: <zsystriker> 0 points for a draw - if you fight back for a draw you would only be preventing your opponent from bettering his score. You are right; there will be negative consequences no matter what you try to change. I'm not offering a perfect solution, only a reasonable ...      Jan-01-04 M Monticelli vs Prokes, 1926    chankins: patzer, in Fritz's line 15.Rd1 seems bad to me. What does Fritz think about 15.Qe4 ? I don't see any way for black to equalise.      Nov-17-03 A Kapengut vs Antoshin, 1965    chankins: patzer2, 15.Nd5+ Kd8; 16.Nf6+ Ke7 goes nowhere. A computer like Fritz may find Bd6 objectively better but if white can't find the correct plan with Qd7+ then Ke7 is best.      Jul-27-03 J N Berger vs Frohlich, 1888    chankins: 9...Nxb3; 10.Nxg4 Nxa1??; 11.Nf6+ gxf6; 12.Nxf6++. Black does seem okay with 9...dxe5. By exchanging pieces at b3 and d5 he should even get the pawn back, any thoughts?      Jul-08-03 Tarrasch vs Chigorin, 1893    chankins: How about 11...Bxd1? 12.Nxf6+ Kf8 13.Nfd7+ Qxd7 14.Nxd7+ Ke8 15.Rxd1 Rd8 16.Nf6+ or maybe Nc5 and Black is only a pawn down with a lousy position

indicates a reply to the comment.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com. If you need an account, register now; it's quick, anonymous, and free! If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.