Jan-16-04 P Kuhn vs Gerhard Keck, 1952 
| |
| coxschess: The move 15...Qe7! seems to refute whites attack here. For example: 16. Neg5, Bxe1 17. Rxe1, Qb4! the point and black has an edge. If there is a way to strengthen the attack I would like to see it. If there is not a good improvement here white may be finished in the Waller Attack ... |
|
|
|
Feb-09-03 Kasparov vs Deep Junior, 2003
| |
| coxschess: I thought I might as well add this.
A Master friend told me in the line:
16.g3 Nh2+ 17.Kf2 Ng4+ 18.Ke1 Qh3 19.Rg1 Nd7 20.e4 dxe4 21.Nxe4 Ndf6 22.Nd6! Re6 23. Nc4 Nd5
He prefers 24. Ne5
I had to go out of town Saturday night so I set the game up on Fritz 8 and after 23 hours ... |
|
|
|
Feb-08-03 Deep Junior vs Kasparov, 2003
| |
| coxschess: "oppositeofchess"- whatever that means: draughts I guess haha. "How is capitalizing on someones mistakes not outplaying them?" I think you missed my point. Human players are still getting the better positions in many of these games because of "superior" ideas. By outplaying I ... |
|
|
|
Feb-05-03 Reshevsky vs Petrosian, 1953
| |
| coxschess: 24...Re6!! a wonderful example of an exchange sacrifice to set up an impenetrable blockade. If not for this idea black is crushed. |
|
|
|
Feb-05-03 Polugaevsky vs R Nezhmetdinov, 1958
| |
| coxschess: Why cant white play 24. a3!? instead of 24. Rh1?
I would like to see this refuted.
Fritz 7 after 9 hours of thought considers white to be at least equal after 24. a3!?. The point seems to be that the rook stays on f1 making sacs on f4 dubious and it forces the knight on b4 to ... |
|
|
|
Feb-01-03 Kasparov vs Deep Junior, 2003
| |
| coxschess: I consider the Kasparov-Deep Blue match to be a bit of a fluke. Kasparov was not playing like Kasparov he was trying to play "anti-computer" chess which isnt his style. Despite that the match was even after 5 games and Kasparov played an opening he never plays in the last game and |
|
|
|
| indicates a reply to the comment. |
|
Kibitzing
