chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile

diablotins
Member since Apr-14-04 · Last seen Oct-02-11
...

   diablotins has kibitzed 166 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Mar-25-07 16th Amber Tournament (Blindfold) (2007) (replies)
 
diablotins: It's unfair that Kramnik plays it blindfold. He's too strong. He should see board.
 
   Feb-21-07 Morelia-Linares (2007) (replies)
 
diablotins: < Isn't Topalov married? > To Danailov.
 
   Feb-15-07 Veselin Topalov (replies)
 
diablotins: <And BTW, check the documents to find out who tried to give this point back to Kramnik and what his lawyers said about the possible consequences.> Where can we see those documents ?
 
   Jan-14-07 Kramnik vs Shirov, 2007 (replies)
 
diablotins: <Time is precious when you don't have enough of it> I wonder who said that... Have you bought the watch ?
 
   Jan-14-07 Corus Group A (2007) (replies)
 
diablotins: Why Shirov took so much time in the opening ?
 
   Dec-19-06 The World vs A Nickel, 2006 (replies)
 
diablotins: Sorry, I was out of town for few days, and I don't understand why the majority of people are voting for b4. What about all the analysis we made on Qd8 ? Is there a unsolvable problem on that line ? It's a sincere question...
 
   Dec-13-06 Vladimir Kramnik (replies)
 
diablotins: http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail... In my opinion, Kramnik has enough of these matches. And I think he could even be happy to lose his title in these condition. Not in a match, but in a tournament. For a long time, I think that Kramnik prefers to not lose than to win. And ...
 
   Dec-05-06 Kramnik - Deep Fritz (2006) (replies)
 
diablotins: could K has his K-side majority moving f5 and e5 ?
 
   Dec-05-06 RandomVisitor chessforum (replies)
 
diablotins: <randomvisitor> Great job your doing here !
 
   Nov-29-06 OhioChessFan chessforum (replies)
 
diablotins: <B1. (0.47): 31...Rc2 32.Rf7 Ree2 33.Kh1 Re6 34.b4 Rc8 35.Kh2 Rce8 36.R1f2 h6 37.Qg4 Qxb4 38.Qf3> Do we really have something winning there ? For me, it don't look so dangerous (at least). Is it questionning the strenth of Qg5 ?
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2020, Chessgames Services LLC