Sep-19-17 J Holzwarth vs Albin, 1890
|
jumboshrimpscampi: That was an instructive game! I like the imbalance between the Bishop pair on the White side and the two Knights on the Black side. Related to that imbalance, I found an alternative move: After White played 15. f4, Black could play 15... h5!? with the idea of completely ... |
|
|
|
Jul-21-17 Steinitz vs H Czarnowski, 1867 
|
jumboshrimpscampi: I spent a while trying to understand why White played 11.h3. I was wondering why he couldn't just play 11.Ne2 instead and launch the same queenside attack without playing h3. I was unable to come up with an answer on my own. I came to the conclusion that 11.h3 is a ... |
|
|
|
Feb-03-17 Morphy vs Paulsen, 1857 
|
jumboshrimpscampi: <offramp> That's an interesting idea where you suggest <Now Paulsen could have played 13...Ng6 and annihilated the pe5, then followed up with ...Bc7 to get rid of the white bishop on d6.>, however I think White would have still had a good response to that: ... |
|
|
|
indicates a reply to the comment. |
|