Jan-05-08 A Matanovic vs Petrosian, 1959 
|
kapabl: <zooter> In your line, Black can still play 34..dxc3. He may be able to keep that pawn because the White king is cramped and the pawns on f4 and h3 are loose. |
|
|
|
May-09-07 Chessgames - Odd Lie 
|
kapabl: Oddshark ? That is a White Lie. |
|
|
|
May-06-07 I Radulov vs L Spassov, 1974 
|
kapabl: <Kreifi:> 23.Bd6+ leads to mate. |
|
|
|
May-06-07 J Polgar vs Aung Aung, 2000 
|
kapabl: <al wazir> see Judit Polgar vs Aung Aung, 2000 |
|
|
|
Apr-29-07 J Pinter vs E Ungureanu, 1976 
|
kapabl: <al wazir> A little extra push on the rook so that it doesnt stop on the seventh! 21.Nf5 Nxd3+ 22.Rxd3 exf5 23.Rxe8, and even if Black can count better, he cant protect g7. |
|
|
|
Apr-29-07 D Byrne vs Fischer, 1956 
|
kapabl: <Anyone who doesn't concede that Kal-El would have crushed Fischer is blinded by planetism.> Has Fischer beaten Flagg? Wow, he must be very good. Kal-El may agree to a challenge from him for the right prize money, although he has rarely played two-dimensional chess in the last ... |
|
|
|
Apr-25-07 G Kasparian vs Bronstein, 1947
|
kapabl: There were threats of b4 trapping the ♖ and ♘b7 forking. Black could probably not have avoided losing at least the exchange. If 33...♗a6 34.b4 ♖b5 35.♘xa6. Black could have resigned right away. |
|
|
|
Apr-24-07 Capablanca vs T A Carter, 1909 
|
kapabl: <pggarner: How about 28.Ng7 followed by 29.Qf5 and 30.Qh7#, which is also mate in 3?> Not quite. Black is not forced to capture the knight. He can play anything else, lets say, 28...Qa5 and 29...b4. Now 30.Qh7+ doesn't work. Since the pawn is still on h6, Black can play ... |
|
|
|
Apr-24-07 Tarrasch vs C Kelz, 1892 
|
kapabl: <An Englishman> and <dabearsrock1010>: Of course Tarrasch could have learnt something from us. But he seems to have been good at showing off - that he did not need the knight to mate :) |
|
|
|
Apr-22-07 A Ostapenko vs S Kurkin, 1970 
|
kapabl: <Takya Kotov: After 18.fxe5, please could someone demonstrate the win after 18....gxh6.> This is what I can make out but I am not sure if it takes care of everything: 19.gxh6+ Kh8 20.exd6+ f6 21.dxe7 Rf7 22.Bh5 Raf8 (22...Rag8 23.Bxf7 Rxg1 24.Rxg1 Qxa2 25.Bxf6+ mates or ... |
|
|
|
indicates a reply to the comment. |
|