Sep-27-12 French Defense (C00) 
| |
| kitbitzer31: Ah. Thanks <thomastonk>.. |
|
|
|
Sep-24-12 Tal vs Koblents, 1957
| |
| kitbitzer31: I just don't understand what is happening in this game at all... It seems that almost all the moves are blunders but they turn out to be sacrifices! |
|
|
|
Aug-05-12 Tal vs Botvinnik, 1960
| |
| kitbitzer31: For instance, after 14.Nf5, I was afraid of 14...Bxf5. But the engine doesn't consider that at all. It instead gives 14...Re8. Why? On what basis is such a move made? |
|
|
|
Oct-21-11 Fischer vs Forintos, 1967
| |
| kitbitzer31: My previous anaylsis was right but the judgement after the analysis was completely wrong.. White is easily winning. For instance after 51. ... Rb6, play might continue 52. f6!(idea is to make space for the White king so that the g5 pawn can advance all the way to g6 creating a ... |
|
|
|
Oct-09-11 K Klasups vs Tal, 1950
| |
| kitbitzer31: Oops, really sorry for my above comment. There is one problem with it, White will march his a-pawn all the way to a6 and Black will not be able to attack it at all... Real brilliant.... |
|
|
|
Oct-09-11 Mikhail Tal
| |
| kitbitzer31: I just love the new Tal photo... It captures his brilliant and lovable charm very well... |
|
|
|
Sep-28-11 Reti vs Alekhine, 1925
| |
| kitbitzer31: Hey Sastre thanks alot. I really appreaciate it. |
|
|
|
Aug-19-11 Tal vs Bagirov, 1970
| |
| kitbitzer31: Oh i've gotten it! The key is that the difference between the postion on move 14. and 15. is that Black's Rook is on e8. Therefore, 15..Ne7 is indeed less atractive as after 16.Ne5 Nf5 17.Nxd7 Qxd7 18.Bb5, White wins an exchange. However, I still find this variation a bit too ... |
|
|
|
Aug-16-11 Alekhine vs Bogoljubov, 1941
| |
| kitbitzer31: Oh it's ok... I just saw it.. 34.Ne3 allows 34...Qd8! therefore, White must attack the Black's Rook twice. |
|
|
|
Aug-09-11 Klovans vs Tal, 1951
| |
| kitbitzer31: Oh yea, I retract my previous comment because of 9...c6 |
|
|
|
|
Kibitzing
