chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile

prs
Member since Dec-04-04 · Last seen Dec-25-07
no bio

   prs has kibitzed 14 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Jun-24-05 E Tate vs T Braunlich, 2001 (replies)
 
prs: Why didn't White play 12.B:e6 fe 13.N:e6 Q~ 14.N:g7+ with three pawns for a Bishop and ongoing attack?
 
   May-31-05 Bronstein vs Reshevsky, 1970 (replies)
 
prs: <Kangaroo> It is. 41. R:g7 Nh5+ and Black is a knight up with some pawns still left on the board.
 
   May-29-05 Azmaiparashvili vs A Petrosian, 1989 (replies)
 
prs: <dac1990> I don't believe 26... f4 or 27... f4 would have made a big difference for black. White can answer with Kg2, Rh1, g4, h4 and organize pressure on h-file with Black still having almost no counterplay. Of course, in reality there still is some tactics to watch for (such as ...
 
   May-15-05 R Nezhmetdinov vs Tal, 1959 (replies)
 
prs: Nezhmetdinov's endgame skills were pathetic. It's not lost for White until move 42, I think. 38.Rg5 was inaccurate, and 41.h5, 42.R:g6+ were very stupid.
 
   May-14-05 Ponomariov vs J Polgar, 2005 (replies)
 
prs: <Gypsy> Speaking of theoretical draws, the theory says (and I am inclined to believe in this case) that rook endgame 4 vs 3 on one side (King side in this case) can be one for white if white manages to put the h-pawn to h5. If Black manages to install his (or, in this case, her) ...
 
   May-12-05 Stein vs Smyslov, 1972 (replies)
 
prs: <aw1988> Chess is not all about quantity. Extra bishop will enable White to create a passed pawn and Queen it, after which the material advantage will become decisive. As a parallel, if you remove white pawn and black bishop in chess starting position, leaving all the other pieces
 
   May-07-05 Dominguez Perez vs E Mortensen, 2002 (replies)
 
prs: Funny, I was thinking in a different direction: if one could remove the Knight from e5, the win would have been a checkmate, for example: 27. Nd3 (or Rd3, for that matter) N:d3 28. Rh8+ K:h8 29. Qh6+ Kg8 30. Qg7#. Most unfortunately, 27. ... N:d3 isn't forced in either case. However, ...
 
   Apr-27-05 Haarlem vs Rotterdam, 1846 (replies)
 
prs: I think after 20... Kf7 instead of the text 20... Ng8 Black's position is, while worse, still playable.
 
   Apr-18-05 Seirawan vs Z Kozul, 1991 (replies)
 
prs: Doesn't look like one to me: it seems rook g8 can move, as long as it doesn't take rook c8... I would rather associate White's victory with Ne3-c4-a5-c6 route, but it is not clear who white is going to protect the f5 pawn if the knight moves away (like if in the final position black ...
 
   Mar-13-05 Fischer vs Panno, 1970 (replies)
 
prs: BTW, isn't 28. N:h7 also a win? Not a checkmate, of course, but still: 28. N:h7 N:h7 29. hg fg 30. Q:g6+ Kh8 31. Q:e6 And 32. B:d5 with four pawn for a piece and still exposed black king?
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC