Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing User Profile

Member since Aug-20-06 · Last seen Apr-10-11
no bio
>> Click here to see slomarko's game collections.

   slomarko has kibitzed 11692 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Apr-10-11 Wlodzimierz Schmidt (replies)
slomarko: <Poznan was Polish before 1793, then German (1793-1871 Prussian, 1871-1918 German), then Polish in 1918-1939 (it was taken by Germany on 10.09.1939), then German in 1939-1945, then back to Polish.> Let's be precise: after Prussia partitioned Poland with Austria and Russia, it
   Apr-02-11 European Championship (2011) (replies)
slomarko: i am very puzzled by the fact that the first tie-break seems to be the rating performance. it doesn't make too much sense to me.
   Mar-30-11 Magnus Carlsen (replies)
slomarko: <twinlark: Heh heh. In Australia the <Woman's Day> magazine is a weekly. Should be called the <Woman's Weekly>, except we already have one...and it's a monthly.> is this the magazine? it has interesting articles... "Katy ...
   Mar-25-11 20th Amber Tournament (Rapid) (2011) (replies)
slomarko: <rogge: I think a 3087 TPR (Carlsen, not Karpov) speaks for itself.> You can't calculate a TPR performance in rapids based on the standard classical controls ratings. <Rybka level, isn't it ;)> Rybka level is more like 3200 or something ;)
   Mar-21-11 Sebastien Feller (replies)
slomarko: best results on the 5. board at the 2010 Olympiad: 1.Feller (France) 2.Bartel (Poland) 3.Babula (Czech Republic) 4.Stupak (Belarus) 5.Jones (England)
   Nov-26-10 Dariusz Swiercz (replies)
slomarko: polarmis, very good article! I have followed the tournament and I have to say that Darek was a bit lucky. For example in the game against that Indian guy he was a pawn down and I think close to losing at one point but managed to save it. In the last round his position also looked a
   Nov-26-10 Eljanov vs Nepomniachtchi, 2010
slomarko: you are right. 10.Qe2 works because 10...Kd7? gets smashed by 11.Ne5 Kc7 [DIAGRAM] and now 12.d6! 1-0
   Nov-24-10 A Crisan vs Macieja, 2001 (replies)
slomarko: taking the pawn was playable but it's not clear to me if it's really better then the text. for example after 23...Re8 24.Bh7 Ne5 [DIAGRAM] white needs to worry about g6. another option was to avoid taking on h7 by playing for example Bf5 but then black goes Rxe3 and white can't get
   Nov-24-10 zarg chessforum (replies)
slomarko: Let's revisit the original statement: <Now, contrast that with being in an elevator where the cable snaps! Then you enter a free fall, that's a scalar field, no pull here and there (one degree of freedom less). The reason we can detect the fall, is the weightless condition (and
   Nov-20-10 Hans Arild Runde (replies)
slomarko: well the final diagram is easy, it has to be Bd5.
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

You are not logged in to
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2023, Chessgames Services LLC