suvhasis has kibitzed 7 times to chessgames

Jan-21-11 N Delgado Ramirez vs Dominguez Perez, 2005    suvhasis: I am not so sure... After Black plays 36 ..... Qxc3, What if White replies with 37 Na4 ? Seems that would work out to be a satisfactory defence. Black ends up losing the pawn since White can then followup with Qe4+ (Black then does not have the handy Qe1+). Just a thought. ...      Aug-31-10 M Narciso Dublan vs Kryvoruchko, 2008    suvhasis: I think the following wins as well: (every one of white's subsequent moves are forced) - 80 .... Qxf4+ 81. gxf4 e1=Q+ 82. Kh5 Qe2+ 83. Kh4 Qf2+ 84. Kh5 Qf3+ 85. Kh4 Qxf4+ 86. Kh5 Qg5#      Aug-13-10 Kramnik vs Aronian, 2007    suvhasis: At Gypsy: 39.Rf7+ Kg8 <40.Nf5?? Ne5+... 0-1>. E.g., ...41.fxe5 fxe5+ 42.Rf6 Rxf6 43.Kxf6 c2... 0-1 Gypsy - Indeed you are correct. I did not see 43.... c2      Jul-29-10 A Young vs Kamsky, 2010    suvhasis: After 39 ..... Bd6, White should have played 40.Rxe1 This would have saved the unnecessary loss of the Bishop. But even then, Q vs. R+B is better in this situation, and wins.      Jul-16-10 O de la Riva Aguado vs E Ermenkov, 2008    suvhasis: To dalbertz: Thanks very much - That was an obviously foolish suggestion from my side (I overlooked Qxg5) Then it would appear (as some on this thread have already suggested) that 22. Rh8! Kxh8; 23. Qh3! Kg8 (Bh4 is useless); 24. Qh6 (threatening mate the next move) Black may ...

indicates a reply to the comment.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com. If you need an account, register now; it's quick, anonymous, and free! If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.