Dec-11-08 RandomVisitor chessforum 
|
uavle: Have you seen Naum 4 yet? If you haven't give it a looksee, it could very well be better at correspondence chess (longer time controls). My opinion is that it is better, but more data well tell soon. Some of the endgame heuristics are definitely superior to Rybka's. |
|
|
|
Oct-31-08 A Nickel vs The World, 2008 
|
uavle: If Dan says it's busted then that is good enough for me to disregard it completely. On second thought... Bb7 for the vote. Looks best to me. Feel free to patronize me now too ;) "voting based on a cursory glance at the board" "Chess 101 dogma" Stop talking down to your teammates and ... |
|
|
|
Nov-27-06 Kramnik - Deep Fritz (2006) 
|
uavle: I think that Kramnik had to spot the machine one point to at least make the game more interesting now and maybe more of a challenge. Call it denial but I just can't believe that he did not see the mate in one. |
|
|
|
Nov-19-06 The World vs A Nickel, 2006 
|
uavle: <Domdaniel> Thought this post was interesting. A hardware comparison on the Dutch Open
http://216.25.93.108/forum/viewtopi...
Had Fruit been running on Rybka's hardware there I believe it could have just as easily scored 9/9. Not to say that Rybka is not clearly the strongest |
|
|
|
indicates a reply to the comment. |
|