Sep-12-08 Ivanchuk vs Aronian, 2008 
|
dteodori86: I believe he is calculating the variations with Rf5, with ideas of Ne6 harrasing the bishop and planing the advance of the pawn in g with better conditions |
|
|
|
Sep-12-08 Radjabov vs Carlsen, 2008 
|
dteodori86: In the transmission Spassky is predicting three draws in this round. I see ivanchuk better in his game and radjabov with the threat of Qh4 followed by Rh3 as well as doubling rooks in the d file threatening Rd8 |
|
|
|
Sep-05-08 Carlsen vs Radjabov, 2008 
|
dteodori86: thank you! I missed Qc1 that defends and attacks at the same time |
|
|
|
Sep-04-08 Carlsen vs Topalov, 2008 
|
dteodori86: in the bilbao website says that the game is drawn |
|
|
|
Sep-03-08 Ivanchuk vs Carlsen, 2008 
Sep-02-08 Anand vs Ivanchuk, 2008 
|
dteodori86: what was wrong with 49...Qh5 |
|
|
|
Jul-31-08 E Alekseev vs Pelletier, 2008 
|
dteodori86: What happen if alekseev and dominguez draw in the first place? Is there an extra game? |
|
|
|
Jul-30-08 Dominguez Perez vs Carlsen, 2008 
|
dteodori86: In this case the queen is sttronger than two rooks since the black king is too expossed |
|
|
|
Jul-28-08 Carlsen vs E Alekseev, 2008 
|
dteodori86: Qc4 and the game is over
|
|
|
|
Jun-22-08 A Chernyavsky vs I Nyzhnyk, 2005 
|
dteodori86: White had a huge advantage I think the big mistake was 38. Ad3, The simple 38.Qxe5 keeps the pression on the knight and blacks has a very cramped position After 33. Ad3 black equalizes the game and it should have finished in a draw. Besides that white had a terrible endgame |
|
|
|
indicates a reply to the comment. |
|