Jan-30-10 Anand vs Kramnik, 2010 
Feb-04-09 Klovans vs O Kalinin, 1986 
|
aroyni: <dzechiel> What if 26 Rxd3 Qxd3 27 Qxb7 ?
Although the position is obviously lost I can find any immediate threat. |
|
|
|
Aug-21-07 S Polgar vs J Kontra, 1982 
|
aroyni: <MostlyAverageJoe> Yes you are correct. |
|
|
|
Aug-08-07 Kasparov vs Dreev, 1994 
|
aroyni: Why is the result 0-1?
Kasparov is at least equal in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
Apr-12-06 O Trompowsky vs J Nielsen, 1936 
|
aroyni: If the rook is taken (KxR) then mate is unavoidable of course, but if 24...g4 although a knight is lost there is no mating attack fritz 9 gives the following nice varation with decisive adavantage for white Octavio Trompowsky - Julius Nielsen, Munich ol (Men) 1936
[DIAGRAM] Analysis |
|
|
|
Apr-04-06 Delchev vs B Chatalbashev, 2001 
|
aroyni: Fritz 9. finds mate in 27 with 56.Kc4 and mate in 17 with 56.Kxc6 |
|
|
|
Jan-12-06 B Larsen vs E Nievergelt, 1954 
|
aroyni: <yoshi927> yes you got my point. |
|
|
|
Jan-11-06 E M Jackson vs Marshall, 1899 
|
aroyni: I found a another solution to this puzzle which is rather more complicated but still works:
30... Re7
And then it's mate in 7 if white plays 31. g4
|
|
|
|
indicates a reply to the comment. |
|