|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 72 OF 237 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
| Jun-07-17 | | Big Pawn: <technical draw: It says he had come to Jerusalem to worship. The question is, DID he worship?> It doesn't say, explicitly. It does say what his intention was, but not if he actually worshiped or not. |
|
| Jun-07-17 | | thegoodanarchist: https://gefira.org/en/2017/06/05/ce... Computer simulation of Dutch population trends. |
|
| Jun-07-17 | | technical draw: <It doesn't say, explicitly. It does say what his intention was, but not if he actually worshiped or not.> Very good. However there is a way of knowing if he worshipped or not. Which is the whole point of the "Ethiopian affair". |
|
| Jun-07-17 | | Big Pawn: <td>, it could be noted that the Eunuch wouln't have been allowed to worship in the temple, because of old testament restrictions about having a completely sound body. But that would only mean that he couldn't worship in the temple. He could have worshiped outside the temple anywhere in Jerusalem, but perhaps that wasn't considered worship because it was not in the temple. Very interesting. |
|
| Jun-07-17 | | technical draw: <Big Pawn> . Very good, That's exactly why he couldn't worship in the temple and also explains his question to Stephen: "And as they were going along the road they came to some water, and the eunuch said."See here is water! What prevents me from being baptized?" In other words, "I've heard the Gospel and I except it, now tell me the laws". |
|
| Jun-07-17 | | Big Pawn: That was a great lesson, <td>, I appreciate the enlightenment! |
|
| Jun-08-17 | | technical draw: Your next mission <Big Pawn>, if you decide to accept it, is to find the history of the Church hidden in the life of Samson. This is very difficult as there is really not much written on it. But it's there if you search hard enough. Seek and ye shall find. |
|
| Jun-08-17 | | technical draw: One of the reasons I don't like to expound on Biblical matters is because basically I can't sleep. My mind races through all the possible verses I may have skipped or misinterpreted. Here I reread all about Samson and about the message to the Church in the 2nd chapter of Revelations. Bouncing back to how close can a Samsom-like Nazirite get to a vineyard? These things keep me awake at night so that's why I prefer not to write about them on a non-biblical forum. (also the gags bordering on insults I get from some readers). So my question on Samson will be the last one. |
|
| Jun-08-17 | | Big Pawn: I will try to solve the Samson riddle as soon as I get a chance to relax and think. <One of the reasons I don't like to expound on Biblical matters is because basically I can't sleep. My mind races through all the possible verses I may have skipped or misinterpreted.> Sometimes that happens to me as well, about a variety of topics that interest me. Fortunately, I've managed to improve my ability to keep my mind from wandering all over the place at night. Still, these are good things to ponder, and if we aren't thinking on these things, then what are we filling our minds with? |
|
Jun-08-17
 | | harrylime: HEY <CHEESEBURGER> lol Lol
Itz not good you just posting with the OLDIES in this place ... I've heard you like it YOUNG ...
lol lol ...
GET YOUR FAT ASS
Over to the KAFF ...
I Neeeeeeeeeeeeeeeed
sum
BANTZ !
lol lol lol
xx |
|
| Jun-08-17 | | technical draw: I don't no if you're aware of it <Big Pawn> but I am 68 years old and have been in terrible places and have seen death close up. So it's hard for me to keep concentrating on one subject, so I eventually give up and move on. |
|
| Jun-08-17 | | diceman: <Big Pawn:
if we aren't thinking on these things, then what are we filling our minds with> It's the colluuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuusion!
It's the colluuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuusion! |
|
| Jun-08-17 | | Big Pawn: <technical draw: I don't no if you're aware of it <Big Pawn> but I am 68 years old and have been in terrible places and have seen death close up. So it's hard for me to keep concentrating on one subject, so I eventually give up and move on.> I see, and yes, these things can stay with a guy for a long, long time - glad I'll never know any war and all that. All the same, I've enjoyed your questions and will work on this Samson thing later. |
|
| Jun-08-17 | | Big Pawn: < diceman: <Big Pawn: if we aren't thinking on these things, then what are we filling our minds with> It's the colluuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuusion!
It's the colluuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuusion!> Old <tuna> is going to have a hard time sitting down, being so butthurt and whatnot, after the Comey testimony made clear there was no collusion. Even <Tuna Chris Matthews> had to admit that the Russia narrative collapsed. Time to get the old <tuna> a therapy dog. |
|
| Jun-08-17 | | technical draw: <Big Pawn> . I'm also glad to see we are on the same side in the US political scene. |
|
| Jun-08-17 | | Nisjesram: Hey ,<ohiochessfan>and <big pawn> , today again I and <johnlspouge> posted the refutation of omv morality argument.
It is irrelevant whether <johnlspouge> Answered some stupid three questions of <big pawn> or not because refutation is right there in your face in front of everybody . answer that refutation , cowards, or accept that omv morality argument is stupid |
|
| Jun-09-17 | | optimal play: <Big Pawn: ... these are good things to ponder, and if we aren't thinking on these things, then what are we filling our minds with?> The very next post...
<harrylime: HEY <CHEESEBURGER>lol Lol
Itz not good you just posting with the OLDIES in this place ... I've heard you like it YOUNG ...
lol lol ...
GET YOUR FAT ASS
Over to the KAFF ...
I Neeeeeeeeeeeeeeeed
sum
BANTZ !
lol lol lol
xx>
Case in point!
:O) |
|
| Jun-09-17 | | Big Pawn: I know it. <Harry the limey> gets lonely on the <kc> page. So, <optimal>, do you think that after the latest rounds of terror attacks in Britain that they will finally wake up and do something about this? Or are the cucks forever in charge, unwilling and unable to stop the Muslims? There's an election going on over there right now and it's actually very interesting. Seems that Corbyn, the Labour Party candidate who is more concerned with Islamophobia than with Islamic Terror, stands a decent chance of winning. He's also been very anti-USA for his entire career and hates Trump. He hates anyone who isn't for the Mass Muzzie Migration that is being orchestrated around the world by who knows who. |
|
| Jun-09-17 | | Travis Bickle: <Big Pawn: ..He hates anyone who isn't for the Mass Muzzie Migration that is being orchestrated around the world by who knows who.> Lucifer... |
|
| Jun-09-17 | | optimal play: <Big Pawn: ... do you think that after the latest rounds of terror attacks in Britain that they will finally wake up and do something about this? Or are the cucks forever in charge, unwilling and unable to stop the Muslims?> Only the people of Britain can answer that, but I sense it may already be too late. That's why it's imperative that countries like yours and mine act NOW before we become like Britain and Europe. <There's an election going on over there right now and it's actually very interesting. Seems that Corbyn, the Labour Party candidate who is more concerned with Islamophobia than with Islamic Terror, stands a decent chance of winning. He's also been very anti-USA for his entire career and hates Trump. He hates anyone who isn't for the Mass Muzzie Migration that is being orchestrated around the world by who knows who.> I don't follow British politics so I can't really comment on their election, although I guess <Harry the limey> would have some pretty definite views. I just visited Rogoff after an absence of some months, and prompted by someone commenting on a news item from down here, posted a link to a recent article on this very topic. http://www.crisismagazine.com/2017/... It probably won't be until the Muzzies have overrun Buckingham Palace and have hurled the Queen over the balcony that the cucks running Britain finally think to themselves, "I say old chap, perhaps these Mohammedans aren't quite the jolly loveable fellows we've thought they were all this time?" Of course by then it'll be too late -- if it's not too late already! |
|
| Jun-09-17 | | playground player: <optimal play> The UK electoral disaster was bound to happen. Every time people turn around, they're getting massacred by Muslims: and their government refuses to protect them. So whoever was in power was bound to get crushed in the vote. I don't know why the governments and political leaders of the West refuse to perform the most basic function of any government--to protect their own people from those who seek to harm them. President Trump would like to carry out that function, but The Swamp won't let him. |
|
| Jun-09-17 | | diceman: <playground player:
I don't know why the governments and political leaders of the West refuse to perform the most basic function of any government--to protect their own people from those who seek to harm them. President Trump would like to carry out that function, but The Swamp won't let him.> Trump was a brand, and a billionaire, going in.
The Obama's/Hillary's needed government to “get rich.” <needed government> In the case of Democrats, that's “victims.” |
|
| Jun-09-17 | | Big Pawn: Attention Elite Posters
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ud...
This video clip of Trump speaking, I suppose at one of his campaign stops last year, is quite insightful. It's interesting to think that our president actually said this out loud. This goes in the history books. Think about that. |
|
| Jun-09-17 | | optimal play: This article from the New York Times last month... <Australia’s Immoral Preference for Christian Refugees> https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/03/... <SYDNEY, Australia — Like many Western countries, Australia has agreed to resettle refugees from the wars in Syria and Iraq. Unlike other countries, Australia explicitly favors Christians, even though they are a minority of those seeking refuge.> <Data I obtained through Australia’s freedom of information law shows that 78 percent of the approximately 18,563 refugees from Syria and Iraq granted entry from July 1, 2015, to Jan. 6 of this year identified themselves as Christian.> "Immoral" preference?
We're determined not to descend into an Islamic war-zone like Britain and Europe! Our goal is to get up to 100% Christian refugees with NO Muzzies allowed! And the New York Times can go to hell! |
|
| Jun-10-17 | | Big Pawn: New York Times liberals! "Immoral Preference" because the left hates Christians. Good for Australia looking to get 100% Christian refugees and NO Muzzies! That only makes perfect sense. The Muzzies have all these Muzz countries in and around the Middle East that can easily absorb these refugees, so they should take them. Why do they have to shove them down our throats? The left is left because they have zero common sense. |
|
 |
|
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 72 OF 237 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Kibitzing
