Hell, he's even adjusted it to try offend more..

When he posted that link HERE, on this page after a post of mine a few week ago i said i'd let the administrators decide whether he was taking the p@*s, but it appears everyone's noticed..

Yes, that is called Deluxe Chess Viewer, which is now in Version 2, Beta stage. It has been in use for the last 3 (?) years or so...

And yes, it is chess-related for <AJ> to promote his own analysis, chess web pages, and videos on games pages when they are appropriate to the game in question. This is what he has always done in the past.

If <AJ Detractors> refrain from responding to his chess posts on the games pages with insults, the only problem I'm seeking to ameliorate would almost disappear.

I realize that <AJ> is sensitive and often reacts to chess-related criticism with personal attacks- but let's be honest you guys, all-too often your "chess criticisms" of <AJ's> posts on the <Historical games pages> are thinly-veiled personal attacks as well.

<AJ> I know you posted your Spam Troll link on three games pages yesterday because of a reaction to what I wrote in here. Please don't be provoked by me, I have no stake in this issue beyond keeping flame wars off the historical games pages.

<AJ> and <AJ Detractors>- so far today nobody has brought your endemic war to any of the historical games pages.

- I'm a silent minority, and I approve of this message.

Will you or will you not refrain from "throwing chairs" on the <HISTORICAL GAMES PAGES>?

If you will not refrain from this behavior, you are not only no better than him- then YOU are also as damaging to this website as he is.

It means you don't give a rat's ass about the website. It means you don't give a rat's ass about the rest of us. Also, as I pointed out previously, the pollution of the historical games pages is not something that can be solved by using the "ignore function."

Your selfishness here is beyond the pale.

<Hayton> I suppose this is more evidence of the attitude- your grossly selfish, and self-indulgent attitude- that got your previous ID account banned?

Your response to my request- which is limited to the <historical games pages>- is in marked contrast to the response of <The Focus>.

I'm not aware that I have

All you had to do was say you hadn't engaged in <AJ> flaming on the historical games pages to begin with.

You didn't say that until now. So don't pull this disingenuous rhetorical crap with me, positioning yourself as some kind of injured party, and portraying me as childish. That's a laugh, coming from you of all people.

Your, futile, and ridiculous, 8 year quest to drive <AJ> off of the website has to be accounted for. You not only have not succeeded, the admins actually banned YOUR account, not his.

In addition, your persistent and unrepentant behavior in conducting an 8 year personal war with <AJ> is more than enough in and of itself to correctly label your attitude for what it was, is, and remains: grossly selfish.

This is also ridiculous. <AJ> you need to account for your inveterate rudeness, and mainly for your willingness to pollute the historical games pages to assuage your own butt-hurtedness.

You are every bit as childish and selfish as <Hayton>, and we are all of us sick to death of your private little war- especially in the past month, when you have been actively complicit in spreading this war to <historical games pages> that are more important than any one, or two, people. They are more important than all of us.

Some of us would like to think these pages will form a long-lasting historical record of analysis and chess history.

Throughout his time here <AJ> has always succeeded in developing a following of bashers. I don't expect this will change.

Can't see where all your anger is coming from in respect of myself.

This means it *can* be done with regard to <AJ v the World> spreading to Historical Games pages.

If the website can afford time and money to hire extra help, as they recently did, then they can afford to address this problem.

Equal and fair enforcement means <LIFE Master AJ> is the first to go. Now.>

If me, or the colonel or whoever else for that matter were to leave right now, would the 'Goldsby situation' come to an end?? Of course not..

If AJ were to leave however.....

I think you should have a word with AJ and ask him to take a month out, i think you'll find everyone will get on just fine.. It has to be worth a try?

The bottom line, to me, is this. Why does <LIFE Master AJ>'s posts bother people so much?

Do people really have nothing better to do than to 'follow' him around and critique every post he makes?

Do people's daily life really 'revolve' around what he posts? Live and let live, don't let these trivial matter bother you. Out of the hundreds of people who posts here regularly, maybe, maybe a handful are engaged in this 'bantering'.

Me, I smile, glance over them, and I go onto the people whose post(s) that I really want to read. (One of the good thing is, he have a picture, your eyes can see, recognize, and pass over it.)

It's out of control and the admins hold the only solution, if they are willing to put a halt to it.

There is no point reasoning with <AJ> or with the bulk of his detractors, that's certain.

I can't "ask" <AJ> anything, he doesn't listen to me or anyone else.

I have zero power.

What I want is what everyone at the site wants except for <AJ> and the people who are willing to pollute historical games pages, plain and simple.

Also, <AJ's> spam link bears no relation whatsoever to your "spamming" (advertising) for the Caissars, which had the admins blessing and everyone else's.

Nobody has ever asked you to do anything of the sort, nor is anyone asking you to do it now.

If you don't see the problem with this garbage spilling out of <AJ's> games pages into historical games pages, that's your opinion. If you think that is insignificant, that's your opinion.