chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum

gezafan
Member since Jul-19-09 · Last seen Jan-07-26
White Genocide is happening right now! Learn about it starting with this post.

gezafan chessforum (kibitz #164)

Chessgames.com Full Member

   gezafan has kibitzed 6050 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Jan-06-26 Chessgames - Politics (replies)
 
gezafan: The Eurolibs operate according to the paradigms: whites bad - non-whites good and whites victimizers - non-whites victims. Anything that doesnt fit into these paradigms doesnt exist for them. The massive wave of non-white on white violence happening in Europe doesnt exist in their ...
 
   Jan-02-26 Karpov vs A Yusupov, 1993 (replies)
 
gezafan: I think this is one of Karpov's best games.
 
   Jan-02-26 Chessgames - Music
 
gezafan: The Lost Patrol with Orbit. https://youtu.be/24toZwdFsr0?list=P...
 
   Jan-01-26 Korchnoi - Huebner Candidates Final (1980/81)
 
gezafan: Here's a video about the match. https://youtu.be/DqL3dhw9wdA
 
   Dec-31-25 gezafan chessforum (replies)
 
gezafan: Happy New Year to my chess playing comrades on Chessgames.com! Chessgames.com is as American as it comes, allowing free speech. Kudos to Susan Freeman and the others who run this site
 
   Dec-30-25 Bogoljubov vs Capablanca, 1924
 
gezafan: Why do people keep losing pawns to Capablanca? Don't they realize that could cause them to lose?
 
   Dec-30-25 Smyslov vs Korchnoi, 1952
 
gezafan: Korchnoi analyzes this game. https://youtu.be/ZgGu71t1igo
 
   Dec-30-25 Korchnoi vs Karpov, 1978
 
gezafan: Viktor the Terrible himself analyzes this game. https://youtu.be/n1O7_7RrpKg
 
   Dec-30-25 Maroczy vs Capablanca, 1924
 
gezafan: Capablanca scored 73% on the black side of the Ruy Lopez. A tremendous result!
 
   Dec-30-25 Alekhine vs Capablanca, 1924
 
gezafan: I think Capablanca was a very good endgame player but I think he could be a bit uneven. I attribute this to two things. 1) I don't think he had deep theoretical knowledge. 2) I think he was a bit lazy when it came to calculating. Nevertheless he played some very good endgames.
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

gezafan's Conservative Forum

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 9 OF 22 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Aug-14-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  gezafan: That's right <diceman>. What's amazing is that no matter what their leaders and institutions do it doesn't bother the liberals. They don't care.

Nothing fazes a liberal. They're not programmed to think. They're programmed to attack those who oppose the liberal agenda as determined by their leaders.

Aug-14-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  gezafan: Liberals proclaim their concern about global warming but few of them will criticize Red China which is the worst offender. Logically they should call for tariffs and the reduction of trade with Red China because the pollution controls are stronger in our country. Bringing manufacturing back to the USA would result in fewer emissions believed to be responsible for global warming.

The fraud and hypocrite Greta Thunberg refused to condemn Red China, only traditionally white countries.

The liberal followers, of course, only parrot what the liberal leaders tell them to think. The liberal leaders have not told them to act against Red China on this issue.

Global warming, whether it's a real thing or not, is being used as a weapon against traditionally white countries and only traditionally white countries.

Liberals don't really care about the issue of global warming. If they did they would be targeting Red China for action.

President Trump supported some tariffs against Red China and bringing manufacturing back to the USA. These actions would have helped reduce the causes of global warning.

But the liberals opposed these actions, proving that they're actions are motivated by politics, not by true concern over global warming.

Aug-15-21  optimal play: <American Express makes employees 'rank their privilege' based on 'colour of their skin'>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJA...

(general comments)

I had a black Amex once but it robbed me.

Damn everyone is getting woke these days in the western world.

These woke companies have a lot of nerve. If they ever get their wish and we all live under feudalism, they won’t be giving up their luxurious lifestyles.

I lived thru student bussing and desegregation - it was not appreciated by kids who had to be dragged across town to another neighborhood, away from friends. The new kids they met in school lived too far away to hang out after school. It was not ideal. Point is, things motivated by skin color need to stop.

You know what the end result of a successful campaign of Critical Race Theory and diversity training is? Segregation …. go figure.

Aug-22-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  gezafan: Whites are being attacked all over. Here a white man mistakenly thought a car driven by a black male was his Lyft ride. When he realized his mistake he walked away. The black male got out of his car and killed the white man. He got 3 months probation, community service and a fine.

Liberals support crimes such as this and the slap on the wrist sentencing of non-white perpetrators. White lives mean nothing to liberals.

RIP Sandor Szabo

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...

Aug-22-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  gezafan: Whites are being attacked all over. Here a black female murders a white woman who was her roomate because the white woman refused her lesbian advances.

RIP Phoenix Netts.

https://nypost.com/2021/05/04/spurn....

Aug-22-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  gezafan: <optimal play: You know what the end result of a successful campaign of Critical Race Theory and diversity training is? Segregation …. go figure.>

In the minds of white liberals blacks can do whatever they want. If they oppose segregation, white liberals support them. If they advocate segregation white liberals support them.

To the white liberal white people don't have the right to advocate anything the blacks don't like.

Aug-26-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  gezafan: White people are being attacked all over. Here a black male murders a white man and then dances on his body in front of his wife and son.

The liberal media is already making excuses for the murderer, "He was on mushrooms," the way they always do when a black attacks a white person.

It's likely the murderer chose the victim because he was white. The MSM pretends this doesn't happen.

Liberals and non-white supremacists don't care. The fact that they will do nothing to stop these crimes and will attack those who try to spread the word about what's happening proves they support these crimes.

Meanwhile the carnage continues.

RIP Dustin Wakefield

https://denver.cbslocal.com/2021/08...

Aug-29-21  thegoodanarchist: < Gregor Samsa Mendel:

<<<tga--Ask yourself this - if Cannon Hinnant were black, and his shooter were white (in other words, colors reversed), what would the news coverage be like?>>>

According to the fact-checking site Snopes:

<there is no evidence substantiating a pattern of mainstream news organizations omitting coverage of the child’s death to further a particular racial narrative or for any other purpose>

I suspect that you don't trust Snopes on such issues,...>

That doesn't really have any relevance, to be quite blunt.

Because it is not even about comparing the coverage of one child's death to another child's death, based on race.

It's more about NOTING that the shooting of Blak Adults is covered so much more in depth on a NATIONAL level than the shooting of a Wite child. Hinant being the example.

Any objections from you are easily dismissed by comparing the coverage of Michael Brown/Ferguson with the coverage of Hinant. This should be obvious to you.

<<<<tga--Well, you can extrapolate from all the times white cops have been forced to shoot armed black people on the attack.>>>

You don't refer to any specific instances, but your wording indicates that you are more than a bit biased about the details of some of these events.>

My apologies. I assumed you were familiar with the multiple 2020 news stories about white cops having been forced to shoot armed blacks who were attacking them, or other people (such as a black woman). If you are NOT familiar, then please start trying to follow the news

<I know that I feel nervous whenever I'm driving and a police car starts following me, but ... I suspect that I would be more worried about coming to harm (and would have received more tickets and fewer warnings) if my skin were darker.>

You're wrong. You should be more worried if you are a criminal.

<Here's a thought experiment for you: how much more likely are you to be ticketed, jailed, or shot during a routine traffic stop if you were a white person pulled over by a white officer, as opposed to if you were a black person pulled over by a white officer? Ask some of your black friends about this.>

Here's a though experiment: What would happen if blacks cooperated with police? You wouldn't have any grievance cases. And you wouldn't have any deaths to protest. But go ahead and tell us how Floyed was so cooperative. Don't mind the video record.

<<<<Or, as yourself, what would happen in the media, if statues of Muhammed Ali and MLK Jr. were being toppled all over the US?>>>

I'm not sure. I doubt such things will happen, although I suspect if you have your way they will.>

In that case, you are a moron. There are approximately 8 white people in the US trying to topple statues of MA and MLK. ALL the statue-toppling is your side!!!

You are just simply too brainwashed and bigoted to realize this. I have never wanted, EVER, to topple any statues. NONE. AT. ALL. The situation here is obvious and simple to understand: <YOU. ARE. PROJECTING. YOUR. PREJUDICE. ON. ME.>

You are the one who wants to topple statues. So you assume I do also. But the truth is I want to go back to 2019, and preserve ALL statues that were present then. Including the Blacks. You. Cannot. Comprehend. This. Level. Of. Tolerance. Because you don't have it in your soul.

<How far are you willing to go in order to fulfill the dream of the Confederacy rising again?>

I don't want the Confederacy to rise again. (After all these years, isn't it time for you to learn that your stereotypes are ALL wrong? I mean, if you want to appear intelligent, that is?)

I want White people to be free from the hate dumped on them from Liberal Whites and the Minorities that enjoy a wonderful life based on the technology Whites invented for them.

Aug-29-21  thegoodanarchist: <Here's another thought experiment: have you ever asked yourself how you would feel, as a black person, to see statues to these Lost Cause heroes erected all over the South in the aftermath of the Civil War, rubbing in the fact that while the South may have lost the Civil War, they won the Reconstruction?>

If you <truly> think the South won the reconstruction, you're an idiot. The Southern Whites suffered horribly during reconstruction. It was approximately Sherman's march to the sea, only without the cannon fire.

<I see nothing wrong with taking down statues of people who committed treason against the United States ....>

OK, so you agree with the UN definition of genocide. That's fine. Just prepare yourself to explain your position to Christ at your particular judgement. I need to take this advice myself, btw.

Aug-29-21  thegoodanarchist: < Willber G:

<<thegoodanarchist:

<<<Willber G: Well, you got that wrong. As I said on Rogoff, in Chauvin's case there were four aggravating factors cited as part of the conviction. Apparently any one of those would give the judge cause to set an above-norm sentence.>>>

Even intelligent libs are still gonna 'lib'. too bad.>>

I'm not sure what contention you have with my post - if it's factually wrong then I'll be happy to be corrected.>

No, it had nothing to do with factual accuracy. It had to do with political accuracy.

Chauvin is basically a political prisoner. His conviction was almost entirely politically motivated, based on prevailing law at the time of the incident. The part that isn't politically motivated is motivated by something much worse, which I won't go into at this time.

So you merely fell into the mainstream media/political narrative for your side. Just as conservatives fall into the mainstream media/political narrative for their side.

I am so happy I am no longer in either camp. Color me "dissident right". Thanks in advance.

<(And I trust you won't resort to 'arguments' like <"some liberal judge makes up some fake justification for the sentence"> or <"forget about legalities">.)>

OK, so you're not stupid. I noted that already, but it's good (for your reputation) to reinforce it.

Aug-29-21  thegoodanarchist: < gezafan:

<<<Gregor Samsa Mendel:

<<<tga--Keeping things below the RADAR is the best way forward. For ANY revolution.>>>

White genocide, a genocide so delicate, so subtle, only trained observers can detect its presence. The Emperor's New Genocide.>>>

All this post does is ridicule White Genocide. The post does not address any of the points I brought up about White Genocide. This is one of the most common tactics of the liberals, they ridicule and mock with no substantive arguments.>

Heh! Well-said! <gf: All this post does is ridicule White Genocide....>

Well, it does one more thing! It validates my statement of <tga--Keeping things below the RADAR is the best way forward. For ANY revolution.>

As smart as <GSM> thinks he is, he simply reinforces my truths by posting his knee-jerk reactions to these truths. It's as if he is trying to prove me right by his behavior.

Sep-15-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  gezafan: Pro-white people, those who advocate on behalf of white people, should call themselves white civil rights activists.

I consider myself a white civil rights activist.

Oct-03-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  gezafan: White people are being attacked all over. Here a white man is severely beaten by a black mob because he disagreed with a street preacher.

White liberals support these crimes and the criminals who commit them. They don't care about the white victims or they view them as deserving of the attacks because of their race.

https://youtu.be/UYc_5rX7OU4

Oct-08-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  gezafan: White people are being attacked all over. Here a black female attacks a wheelchair bound white teacher in Covington, Tennessee.

White liberals ignore such violent crimes because it doesn't fit their world view that only blacks are victims. They don't care if white people get hurt.

https://youtu.be/N1eAgsFQEbo

Oct-09-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  gezafan: <saffuna: One thing I forgot to post a few days ago: A Black Lives Matter activist was convicted of shooting up a police precinct in Minnesota with an AR-47 during the Floyd protests while shouting "Justice for Floyd!" Ivan Hunter, a member of the BLM group Boogaloo Bois, fired 13 shots into the precinct.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/far-r...

White men are subjected to great pressure in a society that openly hates them and treats them horribly and unfairly, while at the same time falsely proclaiming that they have (non-existent) special privileges. Even so, the actions of this individual (assuming he's actually guilty) are to be condemned on both moral and practical grounds.

By shooting randomly he could have killed an innocent person which would have made him a murderer. Putting innocent lives in danger like that is wrong. Don't do it.

Such actions are also practically wrong. They're counter-productive. They play right into the hands of the anti-whites. They want white men to do things such as this as it makes for good (to them) anti-white male propaganda. It creates very bad publicity for the cause of white defense. Committing illegal violent acts such as this is seriously harming your own cause.

The liberals, non-white supremacists and anti-white's can get away with such things because they have the backing of most of the legal system, most of the government and most of the media. White men can't. White men could end up in prison. That takes them out of action in what is essentially a war of genocide being waged against white people.

White men are strongly advised to not commit illegal violent acts, for both moral and practical reasons. Don't do it! Stay legal!

Oct-09-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  gezafan: Now I'll tell you what you should do if you're a white man. It's the best, most effective, way to fight against White Genocide.

It's the worst thing you can do to the non-white supremacists, the anti-whites, the liberals and the genocidists. They will fight tooth and nail to stop you from doing this.

Start a white family.

Get an education or training, so you can get a good job. Get married to a nice white woman. Buy a nice house, maybe in the suburbs. Then have white children and raise them in traditional white culture.

Be politically active. Donate money to pro-white causes, pro-white organizations and pro-white people. Be involved politically in peaceful, legal protests. Vote in every election, even school board elections. Post on the internet. Do anything you can do.

That's the way to do it!

Oct-10-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  gezafan: Blacks frequently commit fake hate crimes, trying to get white people blamed. Here a black female sends threatening letters to other blacks pretending to be a member of the KKK.

What's amazing is that white liberals always believe them when blacks claim to be victims, no matter how stupid the story. Look at Jussie Smollett's idiotic story. The white liberals believed it and were outraged.

Apparently it's inconceivable to white liberals that a black would lie. White liberals are gullible fools.

https://nypost.com/2021/10/03/black...

Oct-12-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  gezafan: Blacks have a policy of deliberately trying to injure white players in the NFL. Here's a recent example.

Here black Washington cornerback William Jackson initiates an obviously intentional helmet to helmet hit on white Saints player Taysom Hill, injuring him.

https://youtu.be/nDosjSsNQIU

Oct-16-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  gezafan: One thing the liberals have made verboten is the discussion of Red China's culpability in spreading the virus worldwide. Point out this this culpability and they will go to their old stand-by of calling you "racist."
Oct-17-21  optimal play: The communist regime in Peking undoubtedly concocted this virus from their Wuhan lab and deliberately spread it to the rest of the world.

The Chinese communists have been trying to cover this up and threatening any country seeking an investigation into the origins of this virus.

The leftards in the West are so subservient to the Chinese commies that they will deflect any blame from China on the pretext of racism.

The atheist Chinese communists are so devoid of any moral compass that they have no compunction with murdering millions of people in order to progress their geo-political agenda.

Oct-17-21  technical draw: <gezafan> See my forum for a note about a high school homecoming event.
Oct-17-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  gezafan: <optimal play: The communist regime in Peking undoubtedly concocted this virus from their Wuhan lab and deliberately spread it to the rest of the world. The Chinese communists have been trying to cover this up and threatening any country seeking an investigation into the origins of this virus.

The leftards in the West are so subservient to the Chinese commies that they will deflect any blame from China on the pretext of racism.

The atheist Chinese communists are so devoid of any moral compass that they have no compunction with murdering millions of people in order to progress their geo-political agenda.>

Well said! When people are godless there are no crimes they won't commit - including mass murder.

Oct-18-21  optimal play: <technical draw: <gezafan> See my forum for a note about a high school homecoming event.>

This so-called "Gender Sexuality Alliance" is just a club for the sexually confused. The worst thing about it is the adults in the faculty imposing it on the impressionable teenage students.

<gezafan: When people are godless there are no crimes they won't commit - including mass murder.>

Yep, in denying objective moral values the commies create their own "value" system based on expediency and personal power, answerable to none but themselves.

In other news, you may have heard of the appalling murder in England of a member of parliament. For some days, there was no news about his murderer until finally the police were forced to release details of the killer; a Somali Muslim named Ali Harbi Ali, and have declared the crime a terrorist incident saying they are investigating "a potential motivation linked to Islamist extremism".

File this under: The Benefits of Diversity.

Oct-29-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  gezafan: White people are being attacked all over. Here a black male punches a white woman in the face on a train. Blacks have been emboldened to attack white people because they know they won't be prosecuted by white liberal and black supremacist prosecutors and because white liberals, like the ones on Rogoff, will defend them.

The result is a massive, one-sided wave of violence against white people.

https://conservativeus.com/wp-conte.

Oct-29-21  optimal play: Geza, when I click on your link it takes me to CONSERVATIVE US True Conservative News but says "Oops! That page can’t be found."
Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 22)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 9 OF 22 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC