< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 614 OF 751 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Aug-05-18 | | cormier: http://www.usccb.org/bible/readings... |
|
Aug-05-18 | | optimal play: <If there was never an original human language, how did we wind up with so many different languages?> Whether there was just one original human language is unknown, but certainly there were much fewer than today. How we wound up with so many different languages is due to populations splitting up and losing contact with each other. Over time their language changed, just as English today is spoken differently to English in the time of Shakespeare. Further clarification can be found in this brief YouTube video: http://www.slate.com/blogs/lexicon_... <Do All Languages Derive from a Single Common Ancestor?> "Progressivism must be destroyed." |
|
Aug-06-18 | | cormier: Gospel
This is my beloved Son. |
|
Aug-06-18 | | cormier: http://www.usccb.org/bible/readings... |
|
Aug-06-18 | | cormier: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uIN... |
|
Aug-06-18
 | | playground player: <Esteemed Colleagues> If now we're going to be hearing from liberals, let's hear them defend the New York Times' new editorial board member, Sarah Jeong--who ceaselessly denounces (and I quote) "dumbass f***ing white people" who are, in her words, "like dogs" and "only fit to live underground like groveling goblins." What's your alibi for this sweetheart? |
|
Aug-06-18
 | | playground player: P.S.--Progressivism must be destroyed. |
|
Aug-06-18 | | diceman: <playground player: <Esteemed Colleagues> If now we're going to be hearing from liberals, let's hear them defend the New York Times' new editorial board member, Sarah Jeong--who ceaselessly denounces (and I quote) "dumbass f***ing white people" who are, in her words, "like dogs" and "only fit to live underground like groveling goblins."> "Progressivism must be destroyed." |
|
Aug-06-18
 | | jessicafischerqueen: Er <steamed colleagues> I don't think this is a good slogan brahs: "Progressivism must be destroyed." It concedes the notion that there can be "progress" from sociocultural arrangements that are *not* insane. Almost every one of them in history is less insane than <Social Justice Warrior Stalinism>. You don't even want to use "liberal" in a pejorative rallying slogan- too close to <libertarianism> which is what I suspect most of you would be in favor of. Don't concede space on a chess board unless you have a really good reason. I fail to see a good reason to concede any space whatsoever to <Social Justice Warrior Stalinism>. |
|
Aug-06-18
 | | jessicafischerqueen:
<Ben Shapiro> on the disgusting racist <Sarah Jeong>: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dN8... |
|
Aug-06-18 | | GhostFrog: The Sarah Jeong incident is very easy to understand if you've spent enough time around socially-liberal millennials, actually. Tweets like "#cancelwhitepeople" and tweets about "white people" in general are common and akin to "Eat the rich" or "Kill all men" - it's hyperbole (and, in case it's not clear, satire) used within ideological ingroups to reference what they believe to be systemic issues. It's entirely non-threatening and betrays no actual racial animus. Now, that having been said, I've never read any article she's written. If she's simply not a good journalist for whatever reason, then that's different, but I haven't yet heard anyone suggest that. |
|
Aug-06-18
 | | playground player: <GhostFrog> If you have to tell someone it's satire, then it's not very good satire. Besides, I don't believe it. We have trainloads of this racist bile pouring out of our collidges and looniversities. They're not kidding. Progressivism must be destroyed.
<jessicafischerqueen> I see your point, but it's too awkward to be saying, all the time, "Neo-Stalinism Social Justice Warriorism," even if it is more accurate. What I'm seeking here is a catchy label that everybody understands. I didn't get where I am today without a catchy label that everybody understands. |
|
Aug-06-18
 | | jessicafischerqueen:
<Lee> I understand. I'm not really a "catchy label" person, but I will try for an improvement. What about "jerks" amirite. |
|
Aug-06-18
 | | jessicafischerqueen:
<Lee> It's not satire. It's flat out racism and the ideology is clear- there is "no such thing" as racism against traditionally dominant groups. Just google "white racism" and look at the first 5000 results. Ok now make it less ambiguous.
Google "racism against white people" and the first 5000 results will be a theoretical explanation why there is no such thing. There's one thing you can say for the "jerks."
All their cards are out on the table, plain to see. Also, nevar forget- Stalinists have no sense of humour. Period. That's why there has been no historical volume written with the title: "Stalin: The Humorous Years" |
|
Aug-06-18
 | | jessicafischerqueen:
<Lee> first hit- trusty Wikipedia reassuring us that "there's no such thing" as reverse-racism. Your tax dollars paid for all of this "scholership," nevar forget that either: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rever... |
|
Aug-06-18
 | | jessicafischerqueen:
<Stalinists> also have zero sense of irony. That's why our Prime Minister <Justin Time for the End of Canadian Culture> obliviously corrected a young woman by "mansplaining" that she should have said <peoplekind> (not a real word) instead of <humankind> (a real word). Here is the scene for all to see on youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Its...
And now- and this is the *really* telling part- when a Stalinist nitwit like Justin Trudeau "gets the Stalinism wrong" he must abjectly apologize. Last nail in the coffin? In Stalinism, after the apology, the screws are twisted tighter- not looser. Apologizing to Stalinists is exactly as fruitful as pouring a bucket of blood on a herd of sharks so they will "go away." They won't.
Here is <Justin Trudeau> groveling for his "mansplaining": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1z... |
|
Aug-06-18
 | | jessicafischerqueen:
Anyways as expected, the push back against <American Stalinism> is increasing. Every day a new Hollywooder comes out in defence of the "Guardians of the Galaxy" guy who was fired for past tweets judged to be politically incorrect. This is called "twitter swarming" and the pushback against it is most certainly growing. |
|
Aug-06-18
 | | jessicafischerqueen:
And one more thing.
There is also "frogsplaining," which you can now witness right here in your own forum. This is the calm, even tempered and excruciatingly condescending "explanation" that you need to have "explained" to you that "explains" why you didn't understand how wrong you were about disgusting, opportunistic racists like <Sarah Jeong>. |
|
Aug-06-18 | | GhostFrog: I've spent most of my time online in liberal echo chambers. I've seen how people react to conservatives in those spaces - poor intentions are assumed, fights break out, civil discourse grinds to a halt. When I saw that I was entering a conservative echo chamber, I decided I wanted to try to have discussions without my presence causing that hostility. I'm not being calm and even-tempered as some sort of condescending trolling attempt; I'm motivated by my goal of opening up polite discussion and that goal is keeping me calm and even-tempered. I really did just come here for civil discussion. I honestly do understand if you can't trust my intentions though and will bear no resentment for it if that's the case. If I will simply cause friction here, I will stop posting. |
|
Aug-06-18
 | | jessicafischerqueen:
I wouldn't give up so easily, me dear <frog>. Luckily for all of us, the host of this forum is indeed willing to entertain a civil discussion. You shouldn't be put off by crabapples such as myself. I'm sorry if I misread your tone- not so easy to read tone compared to face to face discussions. At any rate, I am interested in hearing your opinion. |
|
Aug-07-18
 | | playground player: <GhostFrog> I'd hardly call this page an echo chamber, but be that as it may. I'm afraid my patience isn't all it used to be. See, I don't care anymore what "Science says" about moral and religious issues. I don't much care what Science says about anything, and I've grown a bit touchy about having to suck up tons of abuse because I'm a white man, etc. You read this every day for years on end, and it kind of gets to you. I've also gotten really tired of the expectation that I should kow-tow to characters like drag queens. People who send their kids to Drag Queen Story Hour ought to have their heads examined. So I don't accept Sarah Jeong's spewings as satire or hyperbole--and I would very much like to see people stand up to her and her allies, defy them, and defeat them. Totally. You are welcome to post here, you will not be called names or cursed at, no one will wish calamities to befall you--a la liberals wishing death to Michael Crichton's family, because he didn't swallow Global Warming--but I don't think you can expect much in the way of agreement. Furthermore, progressivism must be destroyed. |
|
Aug-07-18
 | | jessicafischerqueen:
<Lee> Like a shot at the Olympics, well put. I still have a problem with the slogan though.
"Civilization can only progress if progressivism is destroyed." I think that concedes ground to the Stalinists for no good reason, but I won't bring it up again. We'll have to agree to disagree on this one. |
|
Aug-07-18 | | cormier: <<Lord, command me to come to you on the water> Every plant that my heavenly Father has not planted
will be uprooted> |
|
Aug-07-18 | | cormier: http://www.usccb.org/bible/readings... |
|
Aug-08-18
 | | playground player: <Esteemed Colleagues> Bit of a cockup on the Blue Wave front, in Ohio. https://leeduigon.com/2018/08/08/gr... Dems lose because Green Party candidate siphons off 1,100 votes--a candidate who claims descent from space aliens from the Pleiades. <jessicafischerqueen> I understand your objection to my slogan, "Progressivism must be destroyed," and I remain open to suggestion for a better one. But I just don't think "Neo-Stalinist Social Justice Warriorism must be destroyed" has quite the ring to it. I mean, we've got to call it something, right?
Meanwhile, <Mrs. PGP> and I are celebrating our 41st wedding anniversary today. We didn't get to where we are today without getting to our 41st anniversary. |
|
 |
 |
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 614 OF 751 ·
Later Kibitzing> |