|Jan-06-03|| ||ughaibu: Black sacrifices two pawns for control of central black squares. It's almost enough to win. |
|Jan-06-03|| ||PVS: I used to hate games with pawn chains blocking my pieces. |
|Jan-06-03|| ||ughaibu: How do you feel now? I dont know if Kotov enjoyed the game but he was impressed enough to use it in Think Like A Grandmaster. |
|Jan-06-03|| ||PVS: I have not played serious chess in a long time. It was really a matter of what sorts of positions I played better. For most of my "career" I had an opening arsenal of the Scotch Game as white (2.c3 against the Sicilian; and played the King's Gambit for a change of pace) and against 1. e4 I played the Pirc (sometimes 1...e5 if I knew my opponent would not play the Ruy Lopez; once in a match I played the Centre Counter Gambit and lost in about 20 moves) and the Benko Gambit against 1. d4. Now I enjoy studying all types of games if they have points of interest. |
|Jan-07-03|| ||THE GENERAL: would you still reccommend this scotch/pirc/benko approach? |
|Jan-08-03|| ||PVS: The basics of my openings were all gleaned from the book An Opening Repertoire for the Attacking Player by Keene and Levy. I believe this sort of book is designed for someone who has achieved a 1400 level or so and wants to climb. I bought the book about twenty years ago. At the time the lines suggested were not well booked and forcing variations were provided. I never really abandoned it, but I added the Vienna Gambit and a couple of lines in the King's Gambit as white and some 1…e5 stuff as black. As I approached 1800 I bought separate monographs on the Scotch, Sicilian 2.c3, Pirc, and Benko. I hit a wall just over 2000 and for many reasons, including the time required for memorizing a lot of lines and my disinclination to do so, I gave up serious chess. History is unlikely to note the loss. For 2003, I think if someone is around 1400 a contemporary repertoire book suited to his or her style is probably a good way to start. However, I am unable to suggest any titles. |
|Jan-08-03|| ||refutor: PVS, what's your opinion of Steinitz' 4. ... Qh4?! v. the Scotch. is it only good v. unprepared opponents? |
|Jan-08-03|| ||ughaibu: Refutor: For a long time I have only played Qh4. Results have been good enough and it avoids white getting a straight-forward game. |
|Jan-08-03|| ||refutor: thank you ughaibu...i get mixed results but that may be more because of my talent level as opposed to the line :) i haven't seen you on FICS lately, do you still go there? |
|Jan-09-03|| ||ughaibu: Refutor: I haven't been to FICS since the occasion when we played. Although I have plenty of time to post on here I haven't got continuous time, so to speak, so it's difficult to get involved in play at the moment. Perhaps in a week or two I'll have more opportunity. |
|Jan-09-03|| ||refutor: ok...drop me a line here or email me <firstname.lastname@example.org> if you get a chance :) |
|Jan-09-03|| ||ughaibu: I certainly will. |
|Apr-24-03|| ||Rookpawn: In his book on the Zurich candidates tournament, Bronstein gives the following notes before analyzing this game:|
" In the struggle that is chess, the blockade is not just an important technique, but also one of the elements in the strategic plan. The methods for dealing with any enemy piece may be ranked in descending value as follows: capture, exchange, attack, blockade... In the general sense, a blockade may be employed against any piece, including the king, but when we speak of the blockade in practical terms, generally it is in reference to pawns. They are the easiest to blockade, and the most dangerous when set in motion."
|Jun-15-09|| ||sonsurvivor: 40...b3+!|
|Jun-15-09|| ||ounos: Now those are two fun moves (oh! the things a chess player must do!):
14. Ng1 followed by Bf1
Spot an error? Please
submit a correction slip
and help us eliminate database mistakes!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply.
Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous,
and 100% free--plus, it
entitles you to features otherwise unavailable.
Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should
Please observe our posting guidelines:
- No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
- No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
- No personal attacks against other members.
- Nothing in violation of United States law.
- No posting personal information of members.
See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.
NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page.
This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or
this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.|
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)
your profile |
Premium Membership |
Kibitzer's Café |
Biographer's Bistro |
new kibitzing |
Tournament Index |
Player Directory |
World Chess Championships |
Opening Explorer |
Guess the Move |
Game Collections |
ChessBookie Game |
Chessgames Challenge |
privacy notice |
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC