chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Volf Bergraser vs Viacheslav Ragozin
2nd World Correspondence Chess Championship (1956), Jan-01
King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto. Yugoslav Variation Advance Line (E66)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 656 more games of Ragozin
sac: 33...Rxf4 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can change the color of the light and dark squares by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page. Or, you can change it with the "SETTINGS" link in the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Apr-19-04  ughaibu: Apart from the similarities (to the Botvinnik game) in the final position, this game also suggests a conflict of assessment at move 30-31, and most remarkably things kick-off with b4 attacking a knight on c5 in both games. Having played the earlier game Ragozin would've had a significant experiential advantage in assessing the coming positions. I cant help wondering if his whole plan of b5 and Nb5-d4 wasn't directed to setting up the possibility. It would be very interesting to see the players' notes for this game.
Apr-19-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: There is a little doubt in my mind that you see it acurately, <ughaibu>.
Apr-19-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  meloncio: <ughaibu> <It would be very interesting to see the players' notes for this game> I have this game commented by Botvinnik in his book "Ragozin's Selected Games" (Spanish version). I could try the translation, but there is six pages only for this game (BTW, the last one of the book). Too much for my poor English and my laziness!

I can tell you what Botvinnik writes after the final move: "Omnipotent knight! Always on time to defend and to attack! Now white can't avoid to lose material"

Apr-19-04  Lawrence: <Gypsy>, (as the crotchety old ex-English teacher that I am) I think you mean "There is little doubt..."
Apr-19-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: Oh no! Thanks for catching that, <Lawrence>! Yes, I do concur with <ughaibu> speculations.
Apr-20-04  ughaibu: Meloncio: Is six pages for one game about standard for Botvinnik's book? I would be particularly interested in anything Botvinnik had to say about black's 24th, 30th and 33rd moves and white's 31st move and, of course, any other remarks about the game that strike you as interesting.
Apr-20-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  meloncio: <ughaibu> No, six aren't the standard in the book; usual is 2-3 pages for every game. In the foreword, Botvinnik explains that Ragozin was slowly writing the book from some years ago, but he could finish because his illness (cancer) and death. He and others friends finished the work and published the book. So there are games commented by Ragozin (short comments) and others by Botvinnik (extended comments, like this one). By the way, he don't say who were the 'others friends'.

"24. ... Nxb5!, If 24. ... axb5 25.Ra7 . Black don't want a passive defense."

"30. ... Qf7. Very clever move. Black are ready to attack if white decides the exchange sacrifice in c5"

"31.b4! ... Much better than 31.g5 then Rxf4"

"33. ... Rxf4 34.Bxf4 d3! Black must have seen this intermediate move from his 30. In case of 34. ... Qxf4 35.Rf1 Qxg5+ 36.Kh1 Nd7 37.Qc7 and Black are lost. Now the game must be a draw".

He goes on and writes that White lose this game by the mistakes 39.Qf2 (better 39.Qd2) and 41.Qf2 (better Qc3). There is a long analysis for every move, but I think it's enough.

Ooof, I'm tired! Not only the translation Spanish to English, but also the change from descriptive to algebraic notation. Go to bed ...

Apr-20-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  meloncio: Correction: ... but he could <not> finish because his illness (cancer) and death.
Apr-21-04  ughaibu: Meloncio: Thanks, very interesting.
Apr-23-04  ughaibu: Meloncio: It would be nice if you could make a collection of the games in the book.
Apr-23-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  meloncio: OK, I'll try it, but I will see how many games I must upload from the book. For instance, the first game of the book (Murdoch-Ragozin, 1928) is not in this database. I hope not many more ...
Apr-23-04  ughaibu: Thanks. Most games are probably at Chessbase, so copying them is a fairly easy way to upload.
May-03-04  barrister: This is a masterly game on Black's part, playing like a lovely Benoni gone good...
Sep-05-08  dwavechess: In this games both player concur a lot with rybka 2.3.2 at 14 ply.
Sep-05-08  dwavechess: Ragozin 75% moves concur with rybka
Sep-05-08  ughaibu: What percent of Bergraser?
Sep-05-08  dwavechess: 64% for Bergraser
Sep-05-08  IT4L1CO: 13 .., exd5 is a good move! Now Bxd5+ doesn't work or Nd5 is too strong. Any good analyses?...
Sep-07-08  ughaibu: Dwavechess: thanks.
Sep-09-08  dwavechess: your wellcome!
Sep-12-08  dwavechess: With Rybka 3 at 3 minutes per move is 64% for ragozin 59 % for Bergraser
Jan-04-10  mertangili: A very nice but complicated game for my part. There are a number of moves i couldnt figure out the underlying idea, but by far the strangest move is 35. Qg2. I dont get whats wrong with simply taking the pawn with 35. Bxd3? Any ideas?
Dec-09-11  indoknight: 34...d3!! is great move. not 34...Qxf4 because 35.Rf1 Qxg5+ 36.Bg2 Nd7 37.Qc6 white advantage.
Jan-18-12  King Death: < IT4L1CO: 13 .., exd5 is a good move! Now Bxd5+ doesn't work or Nd5 is too strong. Any good analyses?...>

Taimanov annotated this game in Fernschach and he thought 15.h3 was a mistake losing the advantage, that White should have played either 15.Qe2 with Ne6 to come or 15.Ne2-f4 when he would have had great compensation for the pawn.

Jan-19-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  GrahamClayton: <mertangili>I dont get whats wrong with simply taking the pawn with 35. ♗xd3? Any ideas?

<mertangili>,
Unattributed analysis in "The Games of the World Correspondence Chess Championships I-VII" by Tim Harding, (Batsford, 1979) gives White a small plus after 35. ♗xd3 ♕xf4 36. ♖f1 ♕xg5+ 37. ♕g2 ♕xg2+ 38. ♔xg2 ♘xd3 39. ♖cxf8+ ♔g7 40. ♖8f7+ ♔h6.

search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CORRESPONDENCE (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Ragozin's Selected Games
by nakul1964
THE GAME THAT NEED TONS OF ANALYSIS !!!
by Jaredfchess
Ragozin's Selected Games
by meloncio
KID: Fianchetto. Yugoslav Variation Advance Line
from MKD's KID by MKD
The Games of the World Correspondence Chess Championships I-VII
from Published Games by Year and Unconfirmed Source 4 by fredthebear
Raga
from 52c_Middlegames_2 minor pieces for a Queen by Baby Hawk
Queen sacrifices- 2
by obrit
Correspondence Chess, Ragozin
from Games Rybka likes! by dwavechess
Raga
from 52c_Middlegames_2 minor pieces for a Queen by Jaredfchess
The Games of the World Correspondence Chess Championships I-VII
from 1950s Barious Beauties & Bonehead BBQs by fredthebear
postal
by Antiochus
pure queen sacrifices
by ughaibu
STEELERVILLIAN's favorite games
by STEELERVILLIAN
Raga
from 52c_Middlegames_2 minor pieces for a Queen by whiteshark
11.
from 2nd World Correspondence Chess Championship by Benzol
THE GAME THAT NEED TONS OF ANALYSIS !!!
by indoknight
pure queen sacrifices
by Baby Hawk


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC