Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Wilhelm Steinitz vs Serafino Dubois
Steinitz - Dubois (1862), London ENG, rd 4, Sep-??
Italian Game: Evans Gambit (C51)  ·  0-1


explore this opening
find similar games 9 more Steinitz/Dubois games
sac: 9...Qg5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You should register a free account to activate some of's coolest and most powerful features.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
May-05-04  ruylopez900: Nice finish, Rg8++ is unstoppable =D
May-05-04  notsodeepthought: Close - Rg8 is not mate, but after 21 Re1 (or Rc1) Rg8+ 22 Kh1 B:f2, white has no good defense to the threat 23 ... Bg2 #. The only move to prevent this would be 23 Rg1, which is simply followed by 23 ... Rg1 #. This also shows why 19 ... Bc5 was so powerful, forcing the white knight back to the first rank - if the white rooks were still defending each other, white could play Rg1 in the line above, and only lose the exchange.
Dec-10-04  Max Lange: It's counterintuitive why the position is even until 20.Nb1? Black with both bishops should have a huge advantage, but the computer shows only a small plus! But we all agree Black is winning before 20. Nb1?
Premium Chessgames Member
  bumpmobile: I think I like 15. d5 instead of dxe5. Was there any pressing reason to take the e-pawn and open the d-file?
May-13-06  SJP: <bumpmobile> After 15. d5 Rg8 16. g3 Qf4! the advantage has switched, best defence is 17. Nc3 (not 17. gxf4 Bf3#) Bf3, threatening a nice Rook sac with 18...Rxg3+! 19. hxg3 Qxg3#. White's position has suddenly become very hard to defend. I would suggest 18. Ne2 Qg4 19. Qb3 (forced) Bxe2 as most probable.

In addition, I feel that 9...Qg5?! is a small slip. This gives the advantage to White until he squanders it with 15. dxe5. Dubois plays well from then on. Instead of 15. dxe5, I would suggest 15. Nc3, keeping the advantage.

Jun-15-06  Bartleby: Well, this proves it! The Evans Gambit is UNSOUND.

Such a wild miniature, fun to play through. Pretty far removed from the dreariest of English variations and Q-pawn system games that are de jour at my local tournaments.

Mar-06-07  Rubenus: <Bartleby> Don't think you know ANYTHING about this wonderful opening. It's the line played by white (5. b5 ♘a5 6. ♘xe5) that is bad.
May-14-07  Whitehat1963: Player of the Day gets one of his worst whippings in a miniature that features the Opening of the Day!
Sep-27-07  RookFile: Somebody should have explained to Steinitz that it's ok, by the end of the game, to have at least one of your pieces off the back rank.
Nov-08-07  nimh: Rybka 2.4 mp, AMD X2 2.01GHz, 10 min per move, threshold 0.33.

Steinitz 5 mistakes:
6.Nxe5 -0.39 (6.Bd3 -0.05)
7.d4 -1.01 (7.Be2 -0.39)
15.dxe5 0.00 (15.Nc3 1.52)
18.Qf3 -1.00 (18.Rad1 -0.20)
20.Nb1 -4.94 (20.Rad1 -1.04)

Dubois 2 mistakes:
9...Qg5 0.27 (9...Rg8 -1.06)
11...Bg4 1.29 (11...Bxd4 0.00)

Nov-08-07  RookFile: 5 mistakes for Steinitz in an open game? Sounds about right.
Nov-25-07  MorphysMojo: Don't be surprised by the play of Steinitz opponent. Dubois was a real strong yet under-rated player, who put up some impressive numbers despite having only a little more than 60 games that had been recorded. A little research shows that he was overshadowed by others who, though also great, had the advantage of more known recorded games, hence more press and recognition.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Italian Game: Evans Gambit (C51) 0-1 Bishop pair on open board
from Christo's Party Favs For Fredthebear by fredthebear
Ingenious mating combinations
by Salaskan
Game 4
from World Champion - Steinitz (I.Linder/V.Linder) by Qindarka
Italian Game: Evans Gambit (C51) 0-1 Bishop pair on open board
from 20 Movers Take Fredthebear 20 Moves by fredthebear
Serafino Dubois (1817-1899)
from Player of the day: notable game III by nikolaas
Match Steinitz!
by amadeus
20 moves
from Chess Miniatures, Collection II by wwall
Bb6 ???
from EVANS GAMBIT by gambitfan
Crushing the future world champion with black in 20 moves
from Italian gems Part I by Karpova
World champions lose miniatures 1.
by ughaibu
Counterintuitive black win at move 20--but a win is a win
from Max Lange's favorite games by Max Lange
Serafino Dubois
by MountPixel
Match 1862
from Favorite Games from (1515-1916) by wanabe2000
The Best of Serafino Dubois
by SJP
25.0% - 10.0%
from Blunderchecked games II by nimh
Evan's Gambit Declined
from chess strategems vi - under construction by gauer

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC