Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Mikhail Tal vs Ivan Radulov
Chess Olympiad Final-A (1972), Skopje MKD, rd 4, Sep-30
Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer. Modern Variation (B61)  ·  1-0


explore this opening
find similar games 3 more Tal/I Radulov games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To access more information about the players (more games, favorite openings, statistics, sometimes a biography and photograph), click their highlighted names at the top of this page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Oct-17-05  Autoreparaturwerkbau: Weak bishop vs. strong bishop.
Oct-19-05  lopium: Are you sure? I thought a good bishop could attack pieces. The two can defend a pawn to be Q, but can't kill any pawn without anymovement by pawns. How can you say one is strong and the other is weak?
Oct-19-05  drmariogodrob: The black bishop can still fly around the board, but the white bishop on e4 can both protect all of its weak pawns and be protected by them, and exerts influence over a great space of the board. Black has no such square for his bishop, which renders it weak and exploitable by white: first by chasing the king into the corner and out of play, and then by going after the weak b-pawn. But because of white's better pawn structure and strong bishop, black has absolutely no winning chances at any time.
Oct-19-05  lopium: Thanksxz, so a bad bishop has not only the color to be judged on, but the position too, to claim it bad or strong. Ok.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Benzol: I'm not suprised that this game doesn't figure in any collection of Tal's best games. No startling sacrifices or attacks. But it should be in one. This was one of the most subtle endings Tal ever played. He was helped at the adjournment by Keres. A great tribute to their analysis and endgame skills.
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: Tal re the adjournment:

<I have quite a large number of chess memories, but that night of analysis with Keres is one of the most pleasant. The work was calm, flowing as it were, of its own accord; every hour a cup of coffee was consumed...and I never even suspected that such an apparently uninteresting ending (I was a pawn up, with opposite colored bishops) could contain so many interesting and beautiful ideas. Incidentally, the analysis proved to be highly productive, for when on the following day the game was again adjourned, on the 72nd move, Keres and I were perfectly familiar with the position: we had reached it in our analysis the previous night. There was no need for a second resumption: Radulov resigned without further play.>

Premium Chessgames Member
  Jim Bartle: Thanks, kp.
Nov-12-15  Abdooss: Tal’s account of his performance in the Chess Olympiad, Skopje 1972 : " I had managed to win all my games, but it is the resumption of with Radulov that I recall. We split up into groups for analysis and my consultant was Grandmaster Keres, our team’s trainer. I have quite a large number of chess memories, but that night of analysis with Keres is one of the most pleasant. The work was calm, flowing, as it were of its own accord; every hour a cup of coffee… And I never even suspected that such an apparently uninteresting ending – I was a pawn up with rooks and opposite-coloured bishops – could contain so many beautiful ideas Incidentally, the analysis proved to be highly productive … before the second resumption Radulov resigned without further play. " - Life and Games of Mikhail Tal, RHM Press, 1976.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Bishop vs Bishop
from Endgames World champions - part two by brucemubayiwa
falseobjectivity's endgames
by falseobjectivity
opposite coloured bishops
by ughaibu
Bishop vs Bishop
from Endgames World champions - part two by Alenrama
Final A Round 4- USSR vs Bulgaria
from Tal at the Skopje Olympiad 1972 by jessicafischerqueen
Mikhail Tal - Underrated Endgame Artist
by Benzol
Art of War's favorite games
by Art of War
Inspired Endgames
by Albums Dummyflap
Other factors in bad bishops
from Instructive Endgames by Cushion

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC