chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Mackenzie vs Frank Hollins
St. George's CC ch (1893), Birmingham ENG
Vienna Game: Vienna Gambit. Main Line (C29)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games more games of Mackenzie
sac: 7...Nxd4 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Premium members can suggest a game for Guess-the-Move with the Guess-the-Move Suggestion Queue.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jan-12-05  Hinchliffe: <Honza Cervenka> Lovely historic research combined with interesting game analysis. Already 2005 is proving to be a good year.
Jan-12-05  greystar69: <Out of interest:(a) Does most of the non-USA world use "#" for anything? and (b) why is it (apparently?) referred to as the "pound sign">

In the UK we call "#" the hash cymbol - I've never heard it called the pound sign before, since in the UK the pound is our currency and is denoted by the cymbol "£".

We don't really use the hash cymbol, but the Americans seem to use it where we would use the abbreviation "No.". Other than in chess notation and for spotting numbers written by the Yanks I have only seen it used in some computing languages such as assembly.

Unless of course you blow the cymbol up really big, then it becomes a "noughts-and-crosses" game (that's tic-tac-toe to our chums over The Pond). I think I have heard some people refer to a hash as "a little noughts and crosses sign" more than once in the past.

As for double check, I have in some notations actually seen it written as "dbl.ch." or similar, but I prefer ++.

Jan-12-05  Cowwithgun: If the game was actually in 1893, maybe that would explain why Mackenzie played so poorly.
Jan-12-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  cu8sfan: In German we call the # "Gatter" (=gate) or "Gartenhag" (garden fence). It's a sign for checkmate along with the á as <Honza Cervenka> said earlier.

We use ++ for double check.

The fact that the # can be found on every phone nowadays can be attributed to American imperialism (-: I remember touch pad phones that had only ten buttons, there was no # and no * either.

Jan-12-05  Nickisimo: I thought about 10...Bxf2+, but I chose on 10...Nxf1+, forcing the king to the e2 square, since 11. Kxf1 gets met by Qf2#. So 10...Nxf1+ Ke2 11. Qf2+ Kd3(forced) 12. Bf5+ Ne4(forced) and then 13. Bxe4+ Kxe4 with an eventual mate, although the one given up above is faster.
Jan-12-05  notsodeepthought: <greystar69> The "#" sign in a US keyboard is on the same key as the number 3. Is the pound sign in a UK keyboard found on the same key? If so, that might explain (well, sort of), why the "#" came to be known as the "pound sign" - it simply replaced it on the keyboard. If, instead, the pound sign in the UK is on a different key, scratch this theory...
Jan-12-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  cu8sfan: <notsodeepthought> Now that's a deep thought! It's true, I just set my keyboard to "English (UK)" and when you press Shift-3 you get £.
Jan-12-05  weary willy: <cu8sfan: <notsodeepthought> Now that's a deep thought! It's true, I just set my keyboard to "English (UK)" and when you press Shift-3 you get £.>

Yes - a UK keyboard has the £ sign as shift-3 - we have the hash / pound / gate / mate sign on a key, together with the tilde (~)... usually on the right-hand side, past the brackets and often under a back-space key.

I think mjk's wikipedia reference is fascinating.

<Cowwithgun: If the game was actually in 1893, maybe that would explain why Mackenzie played so poorly.> Respect!

Jan-12-05  newold: <Nickisimo> It seems that on 10. ... Nxf1+ white has simply 11. Nxh4. The point on 10. ...Bf2+ is to provoque a double check on the next move.
Jan-12-05  notsodeepthought: <cu8sfan> <Now that's a deep thought!> Hey, let's not go that far...
Jan-12-05  MindlessOne: Another easy puzzle, simply enticing white to a double check. I liked this game quite abit. What if white played, 10.Kd2 10.Ke2 or 10.Kf2. It would seem to me the white is just busted due to the inevitable loss of his bishop, but are there any forced checkmates or continuations in which white can hold on?
Jan-12-05  MindlessOne: excuse my previous comment of Ke2, sorry, blacks knight is in the way
Jan-12-05  JohnBoy: <Honza> - It is interesting that the table of symbols at your Informant link does not include on for "check".

<Nickisimo> - 10...Nf1+ loses to 11.Nh4. Ouch.

<Mindless> - If 10.Kd2 or Kf2, the d4 knight goes with check. Bad idea.

Jan-12-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: <JohnBoy> <Informant link does not include on for "check".> There is no sign for check because Chess Informant (if I remember well) doesn't denote checks at all. It also has no symbol for taking and sign "X" means there a comment "weak point".
Jan-12-05  JohnBoy: <Honza> - My comment was just an observation. I suppose that the point is that there does not seem to be a universal convention. Thus the argument about +, ++, and # is an attempt to establish a local convention rather than a request to adhere to accepted practice.
Jan-12-05  be3292: In my neighborhood, the # sign means "how many angels can you get on the head of a knight?".
Jan-12-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: +++ is used for the extremely rare "triple check." ;-)
Jan-12-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: Since chess is an international game,it is no surprise that several symbols come up with the same meaning.I was brought up with the terms:ch for check,mate for checkmate,ep for en passant.

An old Chernov quote for a similar game."Don't touch that pawn,the knight is pinned!"

I thought that + was for check-and ++ for double check. There doesn't seem to be any sign for en passant anymore.

Jan-12-05  eainca: Don't you just love to see this type of mate!!!

The # has been used by Informants to specify mate since.........?

Jan-12-05  pkjohn146: My brain thinks its Sunday. Bad brain. bad. bad.
Jan-12-05  jedlen: not to ruin the fanciful speculation, but...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number...

And for those less curious folks, the payoff is:
"The US usage derives from an old-fashioned commercial practice of using a # suffix to tag pound weights on bills of lading. The character is usually called "hash" outside the US."

Jan-12-05  Stonewaller2: Fun fact to know and tell: in Denmark the @ sign is known as "the little monkey's testicle."
Jan-12-05  masterwojtek: In Poland it just means "monkey", I wonder how it started to be called this way...
Jan-12-05  donhart: Rather than being immortalized as the perpetrator of White's final position, I would rather never have been born at all.
Nov-05-13  thomastonk: White was definitely not George Henry Mackenzie.

In British newspapers I found the game once as "Mackenzie vs Hollins" in December 1893. I don't have the BCM of 1894 and 1895. The BCM, 1901, p.482 states that it has been played "in the final round of the championship tourney, at the St.George's Club, in November 1893" (the Birmingham club is meant, not the one from London).

"The Maitland Daily Mercury" (NSW - Hollins had moved to NZ) published it on March 11, 1902 as "played in 1893 in the championship tourney of the St. George's Club, Birmingham". His opponent is named again A.J.Mackenzie.

In team competitions of 1893, Hollins took the first board of the Birmingham St.George's Club, and A.J.Mackenzie the second. But, this club had also at least three other Mackenzies: J.A. sen., R. and E.!

A.J.Mackenzie could be Arthur John Mackenzie, in particular, since this man led a chess column in Birmingham (kibitzed there by <GrahamClayton>).

Enough for a correction slip? Well, I would prefer to see a publication of the game dated in 1893-94 with initials at least.

search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
For studying !
from Life is not long enough ! Is there any ...... ? by arielbekarov
A brilliant double check
from bugsy's favorite games by bugsy
Vienna Gambit
from Games to Memorize by starscream74
10...? - 12jan
from Puzzles 2005 part 1 - 01jan-.......... by andychess
Vienna Gambit. ML (C29) 0-1Brilliant B decoy sac arranges dbl+
from GPS Tracked Fredthebear Through the Park by fredthebear
Vienna Gambit. ML (C29) 0-1Brilliant B decoy sac arranges dbl+
from yKnights Add Spice V More Fredthebear Jive by fredthebear
vilken matt Spela
from xfer's favorite games 2006 by xfer
13 move mate
from Chess Miniatures, Collection I by wwall
10...? (Wednesday, January 12)
from POTD Vienna by takchess
Vienna Game: Vienna Gambit. Main Line
from deniznba's seÁmeler(2) by deniznba
10...? (Wednesday, January 12)
from Puzzle of the Day 2005 by Phony Benoni
Game 89
from 1000 Best Short Games of Chess by joekenn
10... Bf2+
from Pursuit (King Hunt) by patzer2
13 move mate
from Chess Miniatures, Collection I by nionios
bad apertures
by zentovic


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC