chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Alexei Dmitriyevich Fedorov vs Alexey Shirov
Rubinstein Memorial (2000), Polanica-Zdroj POL, rd 5, Aug-21
King's Gambit: Accepted. Kieseritsky Gambit Kolisch Defense (C39)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 7 more Fedorov/Shirov games
sac: 13...Bf5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can change the color of the light and dark squares by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page. Or, you can change it with the "SETTINGS" link in the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Oct-17-04  Gegonz: Shirov wrote in Gambito Magazine 2. f4? Is the King´s Gambit over?
Dec-02-04  seoulmama: Geqonz, as much as I admire Shirov, I seriously doubt that his own personal question mark has much to do with the KG's objective value.
Dec-05-04  notyetagm: In the Informant Shirov wrote 2 f4?!, dubious but not a blunder.
Dec-05-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  Hanada: Really?! One of the game's greatest attackers bashing one of the game's most attacking openings. How can this be? Intriguing. Anyone know where I can find these interviews and anymore with Shirov? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Dec-05-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  acirce: Because he thinks it's unsound? :-) Just because he's an attacker he doesn't have to endorse everything "attacking". Besides, the modern treatment of the KG is generally much less all out attacking than it used to be.

And why should Shirov be an exception? I believe that very few top players would give their seal of approval to the KG - things have changed since Deschapelles, at least according to Kasparov's OMGP series, said that any move OTHER than 2.f4 is advantageous to Black.

Dec-05-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  Hanada: First off, let me say I am not a fanatical advocate of unorthodox play or a player who lives off of fringe openings. However, I do think there are many misconceptions that seperate "sound", established variations and what many consider "unorthodox openings".

This being said, I know that the KG is not an unorthodox opening because it follows many classical principles in its logic. But it is becoming a fringe opening due to lack of use, only seen on rare occasions by specialists such as Federov. However, this was the case with the Scotch until Kasparov revived it. My point is that I don't buy into the notion that it is unsound, but rather, I believe it is more a case of fashion, or lack of newly injected ideas.

Kasparov may not like it...so what!! Morphy didn't like the English, and questioned it's relevancy.

Do u think Kasparov agrees?

Dec-05-04  drukenknight: what is wrong w/ 22 Bg5?
Dec-06-04  sneaky pete: <drukenknight> 22.Bg5 .. is illegal. I suppose you mean 22.Bh5 .. when 22... Qe4 23.Bxe8 f3 looks winning.
Dec-06-04  drukenknight: yes that is what I meant. Is that you, Pete, from the club?
Dec-06-04  PinkPanther: What acrice said doesn't make sense. Any move other than 2.f4 is advantageous to black? Is this taking Nf3 into account?
Dec-06-04  square dance: <pp> i think <acirce>'s post meant to read something like this: <things have changed since Deschapelles> who <said that any move OTHER than 2.f4 is advantageous to Black.>
Dec-06-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: <acirce> Deschapelles did say 2 f4 was best, but it was in reference to the Sicilian, not the King's Gambit. Staunton agreed with him, but Morphy thought 2 d4 and 2 Nf3 were stronger moves and called 2 f4 " a completely incorrect method of play."
Dec-06-04  admiralnemo: Anyhow, Federov has a high rate of success with the king's gambit accepted against players better than most of us will ever face and i think many of use can learn a lot from his games. Plus, IMO, the King's Gambit is fun, which is, I think some of us will admit, one of the reasons we play chess.
Dec-06-04  admiralnemo: sorry, "us" for "use"
Dec-06-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  acirce: <tamar> You're right about that, I just read the moves wrongly in the book. Stupid. It was indeed about 2.f4 after 1.e4 c5, not 1.e4 e5. Mea culpa.
Jan-17-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  InspiredByMorphy: I love the kings gambit and will never stop playing it. I think Fedorov should have played 7.Nxf6+ which according to the database, is more frequently played, and has better results. Opening Explorer
Jan-17-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  InspiredByMorphy: <tamar> Interesting note on how Morphy felt about 1.e4 c5 2.f4 . It makes sense considering he only played once, and was 13 yrs old when he did so (although he scored a stunning victory with it) Morphy vs Lowenthal, 1850. I believe I read somewhere that he learned it from the LaBourdannaise vs MacDonnell matches. It would make sense he felt this way about playing f4 against the sicilian as he got older considering he never played it again. I was told by a master that theres nothing wrong with it, and that its simply equal. I personally play 2.d4
Sep-28-06  RonB52734: There is an analysis of this game here: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpa...
Nov-06-07  notyetagm: Position after 18 ... ♗f5-e4:


click for larger view

Now -that- is what you call piece activity.

Nov-06-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  IMlday: After this sparkling Shirov display 7.Nxf6+ became the main line, e.g.: Fedorov vs Anand, 2001
May-25-09  notyetagm: Here Shirov (White) applies a good old-fashioned ass-beating.
Sep-20-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Garech: I have done a youtube analysis of this game using Fritz, please check out the following link if you are interested - thanks!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQ3M...

Nov-29-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  hedgeh0g: Modern theory has taken the fun out of a lot of gambits, most notably the King's Gambit. One of the most fun gambits to play, in my opinion, is the Fajarowicz variation of the Budapest, because if the pawn is declined, Black gets the better game.
May-04-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: Shirov:
"One year ago when I was to play Black against Nigel Short in the FIDE World Championship in Las Vegas, I suspected before the game that he would play the Kings Gambit, wgich he actually did. In the present game Fedorov falls into a line that was prepared for that game."

In Las Vegas Short had played 7 Nxf6+ and the game had ended in a draw (which was all Shirov needed to clinch their two game match); Fedorov's 7 Nf2?! was the other main line for White but this game seems to put it out of commission. In another game against Short at Madrid 1997 Shirov had "forgotten" to play 7..Rg8 (as in this game) and White had obtained a playable game (though Black went on to win). Fedorov's 10 Nd5? had been the theoreticalmove but Shirov shows that it is just bad; 10 Qd3 would have been playable though Black would have been at least equal. Fedorov had had some previous success against 11..Ne7; 11..Qe7! was Shirov's improvement. The point was the piece sacrifice 13..Bf5!. Perhaps the lesser evil would have been to decline the piece with 14 0-0...0-0-0 15 Bg4..Qd7 though Black would have had clearly the better game.

May-27-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  louispaulsen88888888: Shirov is in good company,calling 2.f4 dubious. Bobby Fischer wrote “ A Bust to the King’s Gambit”. White can get away with it because he’s white. But as Black it is almost suicidal to play 2...f5 in a double king pawn game e. g. The Latvian or Calabrese Counter Gambits.
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
KGA Kieseritsky Gambit Kolisch Def (C39) 0-1 Rook entrance!
from Fredthebear's Roundhouse RUUK Manuevers II by fredthebear
Statonc's opens
by Statonc
KGA Kieseritsky Gambit Kolisch Def (C39) 0-1 Rook entrance!
from KGB Secrets of the KOld War by fredthebear
Shirov's Best Games
by notyetagm
King's Gambit Accepted
by Gmonster
Legend Shirov
by Gottschalk
Grandmaster Secrets: Winning Quickly at Chess 2
by Sonny Rollins
Classics of KGA
by manjudnaik
Kieseritsky Gambit Kolisch Defense
from KGA-Kieseritsky Gambits and it's many flavors by takchess
King's Gambit
by Zebra


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC