chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Suat Atalik vs Gyula Sax
"Sax and Violence" (game of the day Dec-02-2015)
Maroczy Memorial (1997), Szeged HUN, rd 3, Nov-16
Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical. Noa Variation San Remo Variation (E37)  ·  1-0

8
7
6
5
4
3
2
a
1
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
White to move.
ANALYSIS [x]
1-0

rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1
FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 29 times; par: 35 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more S Atalik/Sax game
sac: 18.Nf3 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can change the color of the light and dark squares by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page. Or, you can change it with the "SETTINGS" link in the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 7 OF 7 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Dec-02-15  Jim Bartle: The pun refers to comments about movies.
Dec-02-15  newhampshireboy: Great game! Black was finished when Her Majesty took white's rook. She became worthless back there.
Jul-19-19  bcokugras: Suat Atalik is the 1st Turkish GM.
Jul-19-19  Cheapo by the Dozen: The first two moves are pretty easy to find. But I didn't stick with the puzzle long enough to see that taking at f7 worked a lot better than taking at e6. My bad. :(
Jul-19-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  al wazir: <Cheapo by the Dozen: The first two moves are pretty easy to find.> Right.

But I went astray with 20. Bxe6. After 20...fxe6 21. Qh4 h5, the attack peters out. If 22. Nxe6, then 22...Qe1! 23. Nf4 (23. Nxf8 Rxf8 24. Kh3, and black is up a ♖) 23...Nc2. Now white has nothing.

Jul-19-19  clement41: The tough defense to see is that after my initial 20 Qh4 h5 21 Qf4 with apparently deadly threats and a huge attacking position against weak king, the comp uncorks the cold blooded 21...Kg8 and says my attack just petered out
Jul-19-19  mel gibson: I didn't see that and it's why I'll never be a top player.

Stockfish 10 says:

18. Nf3

(18. Nf3 (♘g1-f3
♕e1xh1 ♘f3-g5 g7-g6 ♘g5xf7+ ♖f8xf7 ♗c4xe6 ♖f7xf2 ♔g3xf2 ♘a1-c2 ♗e6-f7 ♕h1-e1+ ♔f2-f3 ♕e1-d1+ ♔f3-g3 ♔h8-g7 e5-e6+ ♔g7-f8 ♗b2-c3 ♕d1-c1 ♔g3-f2 c7-c5 ♕e4-f4 ♕c1xe3+ ♕f4xe3 ♘c2xe3 ♔f2xe3 ♖a8-d8 ♔e3-e4 ♖d8-d1 h2-h4 ♖d1-g1 ♗c3-d2 ♖g1xg2 ♗d2-h6+ ♔f8-e7 ♗h6-g5+ ♔e7-f8 ♔e4-d5 ♖g2-g3 ♗g5-h6+ ♔f8-e7 ♗f7-g8 c5-c4 ♗h6-f4 ♖g3-g2 ♗f4-d6+ ♔e7-f6 e6-e7 ♖g2-e2 ♔d5xc4 ♖e2-e1 ♔c4-b5 ♖e1xe7 ♗d6xe7+ ♔f6xe7 ♗g8-d5 b7-b6 ♔b5-a6 ♔e7-d6 ♗d5-f7 ♔d6-c5 ♗f7-e8 ♔c5-c4 a3-a4 ♔c4-b4 ♔a6xa7 ♔b4-a5 ♔a7-b7 h7-h6 ♗e8xg6 b6-b5 a4xb5) +3.29/46 639)

score for White +3.29 depth 46

Jul-19-19  groog: Whew, got the first 5 moves then saw that it was pretty much over for black. Unbelievable.
Jul-19-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  scormus: <clement41:>
I wasn't sure about 20 Nxf7+ either, and in fact went the same as you, thinking it looked as if it was winning. But again I didn't see the win after 21 Kg8.

Engine analysis tels me that line doesn't win, but neither does 20 Nxf7+. B is not forced to play 21 .... Rg7 (... Rxf2! comes back drawn) or 22 Rxf7 (... Qd1!) comes back with a slight edge for B.

Looks like 20 Nxf7+ is best but no significant advantage either way with best play from the set position.

Jul-19-19  1stboard: What does stockfish say if black plays 18 Qa5 instead of the text move and declines taking the rook ?
Jul-19-19  malt: Went with 19.B:e6 at first ...fe6 20.Ng5 Rf5,

Then 19.Ng5 g6 20.N:f7+ R:f7
(20..Kg7 21.Ng5 B:c4 22.e6+ Rf6 23.Q:c4 Rc8 24.Ne4 )

21.B:e6 Re7 22.Q:b7 Rae8 is as far as I got,

might have over looked 22.Bf7

Jul-19-19  TheaN: Awesome combination. Yes <18.Nf3 Qxh1 19.Ng5 g6> is obvious, but White's down a rook and exchange so it must happen now. I erred with 20.Qh4?! h5 21.Nxf7 but this fizzles out quickly after the rather obvious 21....Rxf7 22.Bxe6 Rg7 -+ and White doesn't have access to the squares he needs whereas Black got h7 for free. With the queen on e4 on the pawn on h7 still blocking the king, the threats after <20.Nxf7+!> are very real. That said, countering with 21....Rxf2! puts up a lot of resistance so this is a very tough Friday.
Jul-19-19  saturn2: <1stboard: What does stockfish say if black plays 18 Qa5 instead of the text move and declines taking the rook>

White wins a piece
18...Qa5 19. Bxe6 fxe6 20. Bxa1

Jul-19-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Alex Schindler: Saturn, not that 20. Bxa1 in that position is losing (whites already crushing), but in my analysis if you are white and your response to fxe6 isn't Ng5, then you are not the tactician who saw the value of 18 Nf3 in the first place. That knight on a1 isn't going anywhere; the king deserves the attention while Black's queen is still misplaced and white still has an initiative. The pawn on the fifth rank does a nice job cutting off the most logical defender, and from g5 your knight can remove the e6 pawn and proceed with the threat (as executed in the game) of continuing to use the knight to make tempo moves and allow the advance e6+ with discovered check.

Whites piece coordination is marvelous, it would be a shame not to invite the knight to the party just to capture a comparatively worthless pony.

Jul-19-19  AlicesKnight: Quite well-known? - but I forgot the Bf7 bit (among other things) which is masterful, forcing open the long diagonal.
Jul-19-19  saturn2: <Alex Schindler: Saturn, not that 20. Bxa1 in that position is losing> You are right but I only wanted to show it is still better for black to take the rook than playing Qa5.
Jul-19-19  patzer2: Today's (18. ?) puzzle, is taken from a game featured 8 years ago as a Sunday daily puzzle (20. ?). To solve this Friday puzzle, you had to find the two preparatory moves 18. Nf3 Qxh1 19. Ng5 g6 and then solve the Sunday May 22, 2011 puzzle with 20. Nxf7+! +- (+2.00 @ 35 ply, Stockfish 10).

Moreover, the difficulty of the follow-up in this puzzle extends well beyond the first three moves 18. Nf3 Qxh1 19. Ng5 g6 20. Nxf7+! +-.

After the clever defense 21...Rg7, White's only winning follow-up is the not so obvious 22. Bf7! +- (+5.58 @ 38 ply, Stockfish 10).

An equally difficult follow-up occurs after the strongest defense 21...Rxf2! 22. Kxc2 Nc2, when White must find 23. Bf7! Qxe1+ 24.Kf3 Qd1+ 25.Kg3 Kg7 26.e6+ Kf8 and 27.Bc3! Qc1 28.Kf2! c5 +- (+2.73 @ 35 ply, Stockfish 10) to maintain a winning advantage.

P.S.: For a Black improvement, instead of 16...Kh8? 17. dxe5 ± to +- (+1.77 @ 37 ply, Stockfish 10), I prefer 16...h6 = (0.00 @ 31 ply, Stockfish 10) as in Kasparov vs Adams, 2004.

Jul-19-19  1stboard: < saturn2 >

No white does not win a piece , he recovers a piece and material is approximately even , White Q + B + N vs Black Q + R + R ....

So does Qa5 then hold ?

Jul-19-19  agb2002: Recycled.
Jul-19-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: A surname which lends itself only too readily to puns.
Jul-19-19  saturn2: <1stboard White Q + B + N vs Black Q + R + R > You did not count the rook on h1. So your <18...Qa5> does not hold.
Jul-19-19  1stboard: < saturn2>

You are correct , my typo , but material would still be approximately even ....

White has Q + R + B + N

Black has Q + R + R

So again , does 18 .. Qa5 hold ..... ?

Jul-20-19  King.Arthur.Brazil: I found the combination, but failed with 20.♘xe6? when 20.♘xf7+ is clearly the best. Again I took the complicated way by chosing 24.exf7 ♔xf7. The resultanting position doesn't seem to punish the traveller black ♔. Then I though: I go wrong again (lgs).


click for larger view

However, after 25.♕c4+ ♔e7 26.♕xc7+ ♔e6 27. ♕e5+ ♔d7 28.♕d5+ ♔c7 29.♗e5+ (now, if ♔c8? 30.♕e6+ ♔d8 31.♗d6 and # in 2) 29...♔b6 30.♕d6+

A- 30...♔b5 31.♕b4+ ♔c6 32.♕c4+ (if ...♔b6 33.♗c7#) 32... ♔d7 33.♕d5+ (♔c8 34.♕e6+ followed by the same mate with ♗d6; or ♔e8 34.♕e6+ ♔f8 35.♗d6+ ♔g7 36.♕e7+ (♔h8 37.♗e5+ or ♔g8 37.♗e5 and mate next) 36...♔h6 37.♗f4+ (g5 38.♕xg5#) ♔h5 38.♕g5#.

B- 30...♔a5 31.♗c3+ ♔b5 (♔a4 32.♕b4#) 32.♕b4+ (♔a6 33.♕a5#) ♔c6 34.♕c4+ ♔b6 35.♗d4+ ♔a5 36.♕b4+ ♔a6 37.♕a4# For 34... ♔d6 35.♗b4+ ♔d7 36.♕d5+ (♔c7 37.♕d6+ ♔c8 38.♕e6+ followed by 39.♗d6 and mate next) 36... ♔e8 37.♕e6+ ♔e8 38.♗d6 and mate in 2.

C- At line B, still after 35.♗b4+ ♔e5 36.f4+ ♔f6 37.♕d4+ (♔f5 38.♕e5#) ♔e6 38.♕d6+ ♔f7 39.♕d7+ (♔f6 40.♗c3#) ♔g8 40.♗c3 and mate next. Obviously, black can delay one move on that with ♕xh2+ or ♕xg2+ which is answered with ♔xh2 or ♔xg2, respectively. Shortly, this line can win too, but requires the perfect order of moves to mate. It is not easy to find it during the game.

Oct-06-19  Chesgambit: good ggame
Apr-11-25
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: The Chess world took a while coming to terms with Kasparov losing to Deep Blue in May 1997. Readers Letters in the August 1997 CHESS say Deep Blue's opening book should have been removed or Garry, because he is human, should not have had to use a clock and could take an adjournment when ever he wanted.

In an article in CHESS January 1998, page 23, titled; 'Computers Have Destroyed Chess!' Bogdan Lalic notes up this threads game. Up to move 16 White had taken 3 minutes with the moves 17.dxe5! 19.Ng5! and 20.Nxf7!! home prep'd with a computer. Bogdan ends with;

"With the appearance of computers in chess the sporting part of the game has mostly lost its meaning. Nowadays it is knowledge that decides, not creativity - as I have discovered to my cost..." citing these games; E Liss vs B Lalic, 1997 and B Lalic vs D Gormally, 1997 ending with 'computers have destroyed chess.'

Whilst I detect a slight tongue in cheek, even back then I would have disagreed. Home prep is part of chess, the computer is a tool.
The impact computers have on chess I dislike is writers who use it as a crutch and write along what the computer is giving without any import from themselves.The computer should get a royalty fee.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 7)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 7 OF 7 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC