chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Thomas Bowdler vs De Beaurevoir
Casual (1788), London ENG
King's Gambit: Accepted. Rosentreter Gambit (C37)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more T Bowdler/De Beaurevoir game
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The Olga viewer allows you to get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" link on the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jun-02-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  InspiredByMorphy: Was 9.c4 a waste of time? Perhaps 9.d5 cxd5 10.Bxd5 was stronger ?
Jun-02-05  weirdoid: <InspiredByMorphy> If 9.d5 cxd5 10. Bxd5 then Qc5+.

I do not see why white has to hurry up so much with d5 (whether preceeded by c4 or not) though - the K-side looks grim, but black does not seem to have immediate attack, and white could slowly strengthen his grip on the center first.

On a (possibly un)related note, I once heard of an ancient guy named Bowdler who was supposed to be the father of British literary censorship (for instance, taking the x-rated elements out of Shakespeare's works, so that they are ok for early teens). Is this that Bowdler guy?

Jun-02-05  Shams: <weirdoid> I looked at ...Qc5+ on and around black's 9th, 10th, or 11th moves but it doesn't accomplish anything I can see. It just pulls the white queen away from the defense of e6. After 9.d5 cxd5 10.Bxd5 Qc5+ 11.Kh1 how does black follow up? I guess he pitches the e-pawn and plays 0-0-0. crazy position.
Jun-02-05  weirdoid: <Shams> My bad ... didn't see Be6 is pinned. I guess, yes, 9.d5 may have been the best (so is Qc5+, then ditch the e-pawn, maybe no chance to 0-0-0 for black so instead somehow do Be7, Nc6, Rd8 and if possible 0-0). I wonder if this is not in some theory book already - black's position appears "inferior but defensible", but I won't be surprised if someone had found a way to blow it apart quickly.
Jun-03-05  Shams: it's not book from what I can see, although I don't play KG. Chessbase online db has 226 games after 4.d4 but only one -- this one-- where black played 4...Qe7. Indeed, the move looks fishy. I agree with your assessment-- maybe black can squeak through but there is probably a way for white to crash through.
Jan-02-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  Infohunter: <weirdoid: ...I once heard of an ancient guy named Bowdler who was supposed to be the father of British literary censorship (for instance, taking the x-rated elements out of Shakespeare's works, so that they are ok for early teens). Is this that Bowdler guy?> It's hard to say. The man known for prudish censorship was named Thomas Bowdler, and he did live during this time (1754-1825). But that doesn't match the initial "D" given by <cg>. Oddly enough, the Wikipedia biography on this man insists that he IS the opponent of Conway who played the first double Rook sacrifice in 1788; this, in a two-sentence paragraph that comes across as being an incidental bit of information. It's a tantalizing question.
Oct-13-07  wolfmaster: Rosentreter, eh? I think that I might have played this before.
Jan-31-08  wolfmaster: White resigned because...
Feb-11-08  just a kid: <wolfmaster>White did because if 11.Bxd5 Rxd5 12.Nf3 Bc5+,and White is behind 2 pawns.Plus development is even.
Oct-26-08  sleepyirv: <just a kid> why not 15.Bxd5 Rxd5 16.Re8+ Rd8 17.Rxd8 Kxd8 18.Bc3 Bc5 19.Kf1?
Jul-24-09  just a kid: <sleepyirv> 18...Bc5? is bad.18.f6 looks better.
Dec-03-16  Graber7: Wasn't 12. g4 a good continuation for Black also?
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC