It will be pretty comprehensive. (If you print it out, the analysis runs 25 pages, I don't actually have to print it out, mostly I use the "print preview" function in CB the majority of the time.)

I started working on this game right after it was played, I had pages of notes within a couple of days. Then I had to lay it aside, as I finished other projects.

Agreed. I discussed writing a book on this event with GM R. Keene. However, he noted that several other players had already begun this work, and probably "have the drop" on us. (And to be honest, while Keene was kind enough not to say this, it would probably be more profitable to have a writer who is already well-known and has an established following to make such an attempt.)

I also have started several such projects. The McKay publishers (New York) sent me an advance to do a thorough analysis of all the Kramnik-Kasparov games. (I said it would take about six months.) After three months, they changed department editors and cancelled the project.

I did one analysis ... (of all the games of the Adams - Kasimdzhanov match); and sent it off to about a dozen different publishers. Sadly, even though I completed the work in like six weeks, no one seemed all that interested. Not wanting the work to be wasted, I posted it on my "Angel-Fire" website as a free download. And some people are not adverse to copying this work. One website - which charges money to be a member - did an e-book on the match. Their analysis matches mine exactly, in some places, they didn't even bother to change the verbiage.

I also had a deal to do a book with Ken Smith, Chess Digest of Texas. It was already agreed that I would do a "half-n-half" book with another author who is reasonably well known. However, Ken Smith passed away suddenly - and to me, rather unexpectedly - and all such plans were cancelled.

Of course, you must realize that I sometimes get 30 (or more) e-mails in a single day ... to remember everyone would be extremely difficult indeed! (Thanks for the reply.)