chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Samuel Reshevsky vs Edmar J Mednis
US Championship (1963/64), New York, NY USA, rd 3, Dec-18
Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation. Gligoric System Exchange at c4 (E54)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 8 more Reshevsky/Mednis games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some games have annotation. These are denoted in the game list with the icon.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-13-12  RookFile: Maybe Mednis should not have played 26...Rd8. It's easier to hold a draw with rooks on the board.
Mar-14-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  AylerKupp: (Part 1 of 2) Still, the position after 28.b4 material-wise looks as even as a position can get. For Reshevsky to turn this into a winning position in less than 10 moves is mystifying to me and akin to sorcery.


click for larger view

So, what constitutes White's advantage that allows Reshevsky to win the game? All I can think of is that White's bishops are pointing at Black's k-side pawns and Black's bishop are not attacking anything. This allows White to gain the initiative by keeping Black's pawns under attack while increasing the mobility of his pieces and driving Black to passive defense.

Compare the position just 5 moves later. After 33.Bc5+ White's bishops control the board, Black's king is stuck on the 8th rank, and White can start his h-pawn's advance to wreck Black's k-side position.


click for larger view

By 38.Kxh5 it's over. Black's h-pawn will fall since it can't be defended by either Black's LSB bishop or king and his f-pawn will also fall since it can only be defended by Black's LSB bishop against the combined attack of White's king and LSB. And with a 2 connected passed pawn advantage, it's an easy win.

So in hindsight I think that 30...Bb6, keeping White's king tied to the defense of the Pe3 and preventing Bc3-d4 (which would result in an isolated pawn after ...Bxd4) is better. Conversely, White should have played 29.Bd4 preventing ...Bb6. Therefore Black should first play 28...Bb6 and if 29.Kf2 Bf5 preparing to retreat and protect the Pa6 if necessary. Or he should give up the Pa6 after 28...Bb6 30.Bd5 Bxe3+ 31.Kf1 Bd3+ (to protect the Pb4 after Bd5-b7). Notice the reversal, in this case Black's bishops have the same commanding position in the 3rd rank that White's bishops achieved in the game.


click for larger view

Black's 34...g6 also looks like a mistake, allowing White a target exploited by Reshevsky's temporary pawn sac 35.h5. Black could try 34...h6 to prevent the h-pawn from being picked off by Bd5-g8 followed by 35...Bb8 and 36...Bc7. As long as Black's DSB stays in the b8-h2 diagonal, Black's LSB on c8, and Black's king stays on e8 (to prevent Bc5-f8) it's not clear to me how White makes progress since Bd5-c6+ is simply answered by ...Kf7.

If anyone has any thoughts or opinions on my analysis above, please let me know.

Mar-14-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  AylerKupp: (Part 2 of 2) Houdini 1.5a evaluated the position after 28.b4 to be roughly even at [+0.04], d=33 and deviated from the game at 30...Kf8. Which makes sense, since one should centralize and activate their king in the endgame. And Houdini doesn't find Reshevsky's h2-h4-h5 maneuver, preferring to transfer White's king to the q-side where it doesn't accomplish anything. Houdini's main line was: 28...Bf5 29.Bd5 Bc8 30.Kf2 Kf8 31.f4 g6 32.Bd4 f5 33.Ke2 Ke7 34.Bc5+ Kf6 35.Kd3 Bc7 36.Bd4+ Ke7 37.Kc3 Be6 38.Bc6 (now 38.Bb7 no longer wins a pawn) 38...Bd7 39.Bc5+ Ke6 40.Bh1 Bd8 41.Bg2 resulting in the following position:


click for larger view

Once again it doesn't seem that Houdini has any idea what to do next and how to make any progress in the endgame so its eval of [+0.04] is justified as far as it is concerned.

Rybka 4.1 evaluated the position after 28.b4 as slightly favorable for White at [+0.26], d=30, also deviating from the game at 30...Kf8 and following Houdini's main line until 36...Ke7. Rybka's main line was: 28...Bf5 29.Bd5 Bc8 30.Kf2 Kf8 31.f4 g6 32.Bd4 f5 33.Ke2 Ke7 34.Bc5+ Kf6 35.Kd3 Bc7 36.Bd4+ Ke7 37.Bc3 Bd8 38.Kd2 Bc7 39.Kd3 Bd8 40.Kd2 Bc7 41.Kd3 Bd8 42.Kd2 Bc7 43.Kd3 Bd8 resulting in the following position:


click for larger view

So Rybka also follows Houdini's useless White king's trek to the q-side where it doesn't accomplish anything. And it's somewhat odd that it evaluates the position at [+0.26] given that it just achieved a draw by repetition. So no kudos to Rybka in this endgame either.

Therefore, as far as this endgame is concerned, the human (Reshevsky) clearly beats the engines (Houdini, Rybka) who don't seem to have a clue as to how to try to convert White's advantage to a win.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collection [what is this?]
US Championship 1963/64
by suenteus po 147


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC