chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Peter Leko vs Alexey Shirov
Tal Memorial (2007), Moscow RUS, rd 1, Nov-10
Spanish Game: Morphy Defense (C78)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 48 more Leko/Shirov games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: At the top of the page we display the common English name for the opening, followed by the ECO code (e.g. "C78"). The ECO codes are links that take you to opening pages.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Nov-10-07  goldenbear: Ultimately, 10.O-O is not "safe" at all. It seems "safer" here to play something "riskier", such as Bg4 or maybe even Nxe4, exploiting the absence of the knight on Nd2, although I wonder whether there is a combinative refutation of that.
Nov-10-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: Maybe not the best day to remind of
<My best games in the Spanish - Alexei Shirov>
Nov-11-07  Whack8888: This game starts off the same as Leko-Anand from Mexico City, but there Leko played the turtley 13. Be3 and the position soon became ultra equal as Black will capture the e pawn or the d pawn I believe.

Here, instead, Leko maintains his center but his King side gets a little messed up. Turns out the King side structure weakness is not all that important.

Was Shirov busted if he doesnt sacrifice his Bishop?

I am geussing that 20...something not a sacrifice 21. Nxb6 Rxb6 22. Ra7 maybe would be very unpleasant for Black, but it might not be a win.

For instance 22...Rc6 and Black gets a little counterplay.

Of course, 21. Nxb6 might be unnecessary (if not bad) as Black's bishop is so limited anyway--but I cant really see why Shirov felt compelled to sacrifice a piece at this point of the game.

Maybe it is something as simple as him missing 24. Nc4, as if White plays anything else, Black looks to have a lot of compensation for the piece--ie Rxb4, f3, Rxe4, Rg4+ etc.

Nov-11-07  hitman84: <Whack888>Good points and its obvious Shirov missed 24.Nc4
Nov-11-07  ahmadov: The fact that Shirov makes unjustified sactifices proves that Shirov is getting weaker nevres...
Nov-14-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  Mateo: The all variation seems eather dubious. 15.f4!? is enough to control the board with a solid positional edge (White's center is impressive and Black's Bishop is doing nothing at all). (Maybe 15.dxe5 was playable too, although 15...Qh4 16.exd6 Ne5 may offer some obscure counterplay).

26...Ne5? loses a pawn without any compensation. 26...Rb7 should be better although White has a big edge of course, since in this position the Bishop is stronger than 3 pawns.

Nov-20-07  AAAAron: Why didn't Shirov play 23. Qxb4???? Is that not a great move???? It threatens 3 pieces and white cannot guard them all.
Nov-20-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: <AAAAron <Is that not a great move???? >>

No, it isn't!

<24.Bd5!! Ne7 25.Nc6 Nxc6 26.Bxc6 >


click for larger view

Nov-20-07  AAAAron: Hmmm, I see, but would it not still win a pawn???
Nov-20-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: Dummy Shirov, he must have missed it.
Nov-22-07  LIFE Master AJ: We went over this game at chess club.

It was nearly impossible to tell where Black went wrong.

Nov-22-07  LIFE Master AJ: After the TN of 15.f4!, Black may not be able to salvage his position.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
24 Na5-c4! attacks Black d2-queen, equals threat 24 ... Ne5xQg4
from Make an equal or greater threat to meet a threat by notyetagm
Book of Samurai's favorite games 6
by Book of Samurai
Ruy Lopez
by KingG
martinsaw's favorite games
by martinsaw
Moscow 2007
from # Greatest Tournaments 2007 by Qindarka


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC