Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Segal vs Albert Whiting Fox
"Fox Trot" (game of the day Dec-22-2008)
Casual game (1900), Antwerp BEL, Dec-??
Scandinavian Defense: General (B01)  ·  0-1


Annotations by NN.      [53 more games annotated by NN]

explore this opening
find similar games 62 more games of A W Fox
sac: 23...Qxg3+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can change the color of the light and dark squares by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page. Or, you can change it with the "SETTINGS" link in the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-22-08  LaFreaK: wooot..
Dec-22-08  zzzzzzzzzzzz: the problem with white is that he dosen't castle
Dec-22-08  zzzzzzzzzzzz: Qxe3 is useless
Dec-22-08  Confuse: Castling in a closed game doesn't provide that much benefit... I believe he was unprepared for the sudden sacrifices that appeared to be in his favor... but as usual... material value is confusing in closed games.. and the first king to get exposed is put on camera and hounded by paparazzi. Then again, that means maybe he should have castled. What do I know? Hope this makes sense.
Dec-22-08  dtowliat: that was a nice game.
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: <zzz...> When should he castle and to witch side?
Dec-22-08  newzild: That was a pretty average game - until the excellent 23.Qxg3+!
Dec-22-08  WhiteRook48: I like the pun, but not the game.
Comparable to Fischer's ...Be6!! In the game of the century or Morphy's Nxb5!! in the opera game.
Dec-22-08  cydmd: Notice that accepting the queen sacrifice in g3 is a forced move (24.Kf1 Bxd3! threatening 25... Qf2#).
Dec-22-08  YetAnotherAmateur: What really surprised me at first about this game is 2. e5, when the standard 2. dxe5 Qxd5 3. Nc3 was available with a significant edge for white. You would think that Segal knew this, given that it this was one of the oldest openings out there.

I would have at least considered as white 11. Qd2 followed by 0-0-0. It's not that castling is absolutely necessary, but it's more that f2 looks like an absolutely lousy place for the king.

And lastly, the mating sequence is absolutely brilliant.

Dec-22-08  niemzo: I agree that Kf2 was pretty bad. But I think you should reconsider your opening bias against the scandinavian. Unless if, you can prove the advantage that white gets,of course. 2.e5 is actually not that bad, although black equalises easily.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Not bad, but probably not Fox's most brilliant game. Take a look at this one: A W Fox vs H E Bauer, 1901
Dec-22-08  Awraq Elmater: this game is good but it was dominated by A W Fox (one side game) i prefer the chalenging game whine you see a good Attack & counterattack as well not attack & defense
by the way the whight defense was useless
Dec-22-08  megatacos: very nice game
Dec-22-08  WhiteRook48: and a Skewer to boot with the checkmate
Dec-22-08  AnalyzeThis: This was a nifty little combination. Some of these guys weren't strategic geniuses, but they could certainly calculate the daylights out of some positions.
Dec-22-08  missing kasparov: <analyzethis> check out my post on the nickel vs world game also leave your comments on what you think of my kasparov vs deep junior post please ?thanks i might right a book
Sep-15-12  shakman: The structure kind of resembles to caro-kann structure....


NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
A very,very beautiful game...(GOTD)
from Collections in Idleness 7 by xajik
mihai's favorite games
by mihai
Scandi Declined 2.e5?! (B01) 0-1 W gets destroyed by sacrifices
from CCounter Puncher Popped Fredthebear by fredthebear
2.e5?! White gets destroyed by sacrifices to expose the King
from yFredthebear's Knights Add Spice III by fredthebear
from Checkmates 18+ by Kasputin
A very,very beautiful game...(GOTD)
from Collections in Idleness 7 by Trigonometrist
DrChopper's good games 3
by DrChopper
Brilliant game with many sacrafices, just like I like it.
from Nikita Smirnov's favorite games by Nikita Smirnov
December 22: Fox Trot
from Game of the Day 2008 by Phony Benoni
2.e5?! White gets destroyed by sacrifices to expose the King
from h-file Attacks, some Greek Gifts by Fredthebear by Del ToRo
from blunder thunder's favorite games by blunder thunder
Queen Sacrifices -3
by obrit
Check mate II
by popski
Scand 2,e5
by kafkafan

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC