chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Conrad Holt vs Hikaru Nakamura
US Championship (2015), St Louis, MO USA, rd 1, Apr-01
King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation. Rare Defenses (E90)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more C Holt/Nakamura game
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You should register a free account to activate some of Chessgames.com's coolest and most powerful features.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Apr-01-15  detritus: I think Holt just missed that interposing the rook on f7 snuffed out his attack long enough for Black's tactics in the vicinity of the White king to take hold. Probably a combination of Holt's time trouble and Naka's superior tactical acumen.
Apr-01-15  ToTheDeath: Nice scrap, Holt definitely burned too much time on 14.exf5 and other moves, but the position was right up Nakamura's alley.
Apr-01-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <ToTheDeath....the position was right up Nakamura's alley.>

Those who wish to denigrate Naka's play have a field day with such positions as those he reaches from the Black side of the KID; one need only see the cries of 'he was losing till so-and-so screwed up', but this remains OTB chess and the very top players are there for more than one reason: great resourcefulness in difficult positions is merely one facet of their armoury.

Apr-01-15  1d410: <HMM> Naka just made it up on the spot. No prep except by Conrad.
Apr-02-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: I knew a strong player who always selected a King's Indian formation vs. 1.c4 or 1.d4, and he would always sacrifice something at the earliest possible opportunity without even thinking about the move. He sometimes lost, but he usually won.

So one day, after he had speculatively sacrificed first a pawn and then a piece against me and then administered a comprehensive walloping, I asked him, "Did you think either of those sacrifices were sound?!"

"Oh, I don't even bother to analyze my sacrifices before playing them. I've learned that if my sacrifices are sound, I lose, but when they're unsound, I win. Since I usually win, I must play a lot of bad moves."

Apr-02-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  kingscrusher: I have video annotated this game here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jpb...

Apr-02-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: cb r1 report w/ analysis of this game: http://en.chessbase.com/post/u-s-ch...
Apr-02-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <An Englishman> Delicious.
Apr-02-15  RookFile: From what the experts say, if white had found 22. Ng2 with the idea of Rh4, we might have been talking about a white victory for this game.
Apr-02-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Karne: Nakamura is another tactical juggernaut, whose ideology is antique. Ofcourse, playing like Tal against worthless patzers like Holt may endow him with a win, but not against Carlsen or any other respectable player in this matter.
Apr-02-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: Where I come from referring to a GM as a "worthless patzer" is just plain rude.
Apr-02-15  RookFile: Holt had a very good opening concept and deserved a better fate in this game.
Apr-02-15  Conrad93: Nakamura rewarded for his childish tactics.
A common theme in most of his games.
Apr-02-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: All those so-called worthless patzers actually have a great understanding of the game and it is clear that those who comment thus regarding GMs haven't got a clue how difficult it is to play well, much less at that august level.
Apr-02-15  Conrad93: No one is calling him a patzer, but it's not fun seeing bad play rewarded.
Apr-02-15  Conrad93: Now a thousand other players are going to try and play this exact line...

Just great.

Apr-03-15  breaker90: Conrad93, the worthless players they were talking about was Holt, not Nakamura.
Apr-03-15  Conrad93: Meh. I wouldn't take the insults seriously.

Dubious moves are really difficult to play against.

Apr-03-15  ToTheDeath: <Where I come from referring to a GM as a "worthless patzer" is just plain rude...>

Yes, what a stupid and ignorant comment. Quite pretentious as well.

Apr-04-15  Everett: <premium
memberApr-02-15 Karne: Nakamura is another tactical juggernaut, whose ideology is antique. Ofcourse, playing like Tal against worthless patzers like Holt may endow him with a win, but not against Carlsen or any other respectable player in this matter.>

Well, Naka has done this to Kramnik too

Apr-04-15  Everett: And Anand, and Caruana. All, pretty much, save Carlsen.
Apr-04-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: <plang: Where I come from referring to a GM as a "worthless patzer" is just plain rude.>

We must have come from the same place! I come from planet Earth. You?

<perfidious> <it is clear that those who comment thus regarding GMs haven't got a clue how difficult it is to play well, much less at that august level.>

It sometimes is pretty clear whether a poster has competitive tournament experience or not. The most obvious sign to me is ignoring all the psychological factors that come into play in competitive chess. It's easy to condemn a strong player when the computer finds better lines, but your goal is not to play perfect but to outplay your opponent, who is a human, like you. I welcome posts from everyone, I just wish all factors were taken into account, not just mathematical computer-like precision in moves.

Apr-04-15  Everett: <Fusilli> I agree that, if polled, most of the most critical kibitzers have not played OTB chess, and likely avoid such direct confrontation in other competitive endeavors. Thus they are here tapping away at the keys bad-mouthing those who are brave enough to put it on the line for all of us to see.
Apr-06-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  kingscrusher: <fusilli> you are so right. Time pressure is so critical to blunders or comebacks. I managed to draw with GM Peter Wells last December after being two pawns down - he got into sone time pressure znd blundered a pawn back ...

People need the real experience of OTB to have empathy ...

Jul-31-15  LionHeart40: This is an example of psychological capitulation. 22. Bf1 is the losing move, trying to redirect the light-squared bishop in a sharp positions. 22. Bh5, Ng2, and Qe3 are all fine. Passive pieces are the seeds of defeat.
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Wooly Monsters
by akatombo
KID Normal. Rare Defenses (E90) 0-1 Messy
from Naka's Nook Mistook Fredthebear by fredthebear
KID Normal. Rare Defenses (E90) 0-1 Messy
from KID Warlords of 21st Century Follow Fredthebear by rbaglini
KID Normal. Rare Defenses (E90) 0-1 Messy
from Minors on the Back Rank Watching Fredthebear by fredthebear
The KID
by Zhbugnoimt
wild, nice mate incoming. 29 Nh4 Qg2+!!
from favorite games by nckmrrtt
Volume 163, Game 2
from # Chess Evolution Volumes. 151-200 by Qindarka
Wow! nice tactics
from Instant Repertoire-6 by FLAWLESSWIN64
E90 KID: Normal.Rare [Black]
by chess.master


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC