< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 42 OF 42 ·
|Aug-10-18|| ||martin moller: Hello Anarchist - I just found it on the avatar page :-) But i like it a lot, it sort of says what it´s all about. Thanks for dropping by in my forum. best regards Martin|
|Aug-10-18|| ||martin moller: on second thought, i think it just might be Morphy and Andersen playing the nine game in their match. Please forgive my English.|
|Aug-10-18|| ||thegoodanarchist: <martin moller:
Please forgive my English.>
Your English seems good!
|Aug-11-18|| ||Tiggler: <Premium Chessgames Member thegoodanarchist: <Sargon> Thank you for addressing the community.>|
Is he the the pope?
|Aug-11-18|| ||thegoodanarchist: <Tiggler>
That would be damn freaking cool if he were.
You think cg.com might get more traffic? Try 100,000X the current traffic!!!
|Aug-11-18|| ||morfishine: <Tiggler...<Sargon> Thank you for addressing the community.>|
<Is he the pope?> Good question. Undoubtedly, there's a legal process in motion, that for the time being, remains guarded and hidden at this point. Of course, an energetic individual could search for legal motions in Daniel's county of residence.
I'm confident we'll receive updated information on a regular and prompt basis
|Aug-12-18|| ||thegoodanarchist: Reynolds number calculator (for <al wazir>):|
|Aug-12-18|| ||thegoodanarchist: <DWOB> posted this in <Annie K>'s forum:|
<Dr Winston OBoogie: Annie...
some action needs to be taken so I'm just posting this here for you. One user has <<completely>> lost his mind and is turning this site into trash - I'm not exaggerating. People are leaving the site, I just want you to take a look at these posts.
... <something> needs to be done about this person.>
I replied that Daniel Freeman never banned <DWOB>, despite hundreds of attacks from <DWOB> directed to Daniel himself. Over the course of quite some time.
And also, <DWOB> when he was posting under different accounts, drove away a GM!
But Daniel didn't ban him! Despite his many many second chances, now <DWOB> is going to <Annie K>, trying to get people banned, for posts that are far less vile, and far less numerous, than what <DWOB> himself posted to Daniel!
<Annie K> deleted my post!!
So I am making my same point here. I want the community to know what's going on, the shameless double standard, hypocrisy and intolerance.
|Aug-12-18|| ||tpstar: <thegoodanarchist> Before I forget, never post your e-mail address on this site for any reason. Someone here is desperate to send you gay porn as a form of foreplay.|
<shameless double standard, hypocrisy and intolerance>
Now is a good time to remind you of my posting history here on that topic:
thegoodanarchist chessforum (kibitz #385)
thegoodanarchist chessforum (kibitz #389)
thegoodanarchist chessforum (kibitz #393)
thegoodanarchist chessforum (kibitz #404)
All men had a good friend who fell for a bad woman, even though you knew that woman was pure poison and should be avoided at all costs. Sometimes, you lose your friend in the process, then they come back to you years later saying you were right all along. Yes it breaks your heart to watch them making a big mistake, but what else do you do?
The new management has to decide if they return to being a CHESS SITE or else continue this social justice experiment, specifically criminal rehabilitation. It is not for us to decide.
|Aug-12-18|| ||Keyser Soze: <tga> talking about that forum , hope you are not missing this:|
On Kibitzer cafe:
Hi <Daniel's mom>. You need a premium membership so I'll take care of that>
Answer on forum:
<Dr Winston OBoogie: Annie. I've seen people saying they won't renew their membership and give their credit card details, because of fraud I'm guessing. I trust you so am I safe to give my credit card details and buy someone a membership?>
<Annie K.: Mark, srsly, do you think she needs someone to buy it for her? One word to <Sargon> is all it should take.>
Answer. Course not. The guy is just desperate to get some leverage with the new adm (by <<<any>>> means) or just afraid to get booted immediately for his past/present behavior.
|Aug-12-18|| ||tpstar: <Keyser Soze> Speaking of site history, now is a good time to recall this disciplinary action from 2012:|
<As most devoted Chessgames members know, the Kibitzing areas of Chessgames--like any large internet forum--have had their share of flame wars. Vitriolic exchanges fly back and forth between people who scarcely know each other. Lately, one of them in particular has become very visible, spilling onto pages of all sorts of classic games. This longstanding problem has now proliferated to the extent that nearly every Chessgames member has been exposed to it.
Lately, the Chessgames.com admins have had a flood of complaints, and as a result they've deleted many messages. We decided to start to keep score, and determine exactly which members are the cause of most of our disturbances. Not surprisingly, we found that the same names crop up again and again.
Now we're prepared to take extraordinary measures to try to stamp out this flame war: we have now placed a number of members on kibitzing probation. All of these individuals have been identified as the main participants of this flame war.
There are seven of them (at current count) and all been placed on kibitzing probation for one week, in what we call a "cooling off period". They are as follows: <Colonel Mortimer>, <JoergWalter>, <LIFE Master AJ>, <Nemesistic>, <Robed.Bishop>, <SimonWebbsTiger>, and <TheFocus>.
We hope that when this week is over, some degree of civility is restored.>
Kibitzer's Café (kibitz #112798)
Those seven individuals wasted hundred of hours of Daniel's time. Yes I said hundreds.
You will remember this, from my chessforum in 2016:
<Family members, particularly minors, should not be dragged into something like this.
His family should be left alone. Btw, I am quite shocked by the attacks and insults directed against the webmaster. When it is demanded of him to take action on the site based on what goes on off-site his job becomes impossible.>
Then this person had nothing to say when his friend went right after the late Webmaster's mother. Shameful.
|Aug-12-18|| ||thegoodanarchist: <tpstar>
Though I don't always respond, yes I've read every post of yours in my forum.
Thanks for your advice.
<You will remember this, from my chessforum in 2016:>
Actually, I don't recall reading that in your forum. But the writing style has a familiar ring to it.
I don't think I need to go fishing to figure out who posted that.
|Aug-12-18|| ||thegoodanarchist: <Keyser Soze>
Thanks for keeping me updated!
|Aug-12-18|| ||tpstar: <thegoodanarchist> I am very sorry but these criminal cases are way over your head. We cannot afford to have any further innocent victims get ensnared here.|
Best wishes. =)
|Aug-12-18|| ||Keyser Soze: Public service. My pleasure.
I wonder what <sargon> will think when he reads those hundreds of emails (including dozens of legal threats) sent by someone.
He must be absolutely deluded to think that buyimg someone a premium membership wil get him off the hook.
He is back to his normal ("🤣🤣😅😅") behavior .so easy to get his mask off.
|Aug-13-18|| ||OhioChessFan: <tga: <Annie K> deleted my post!!>|
She's not perfect, but she has a pretty good batting average. I'm on record with my objection to how she moderates her forum. Patently unfair, but okay, whatever. The problem is we are being told over and over and over to just trust her, that person who is unfair in the one area she has the most official control.......ummm, the math sort of breaks down there, doesn't it? Even worse, she is the strongest supporter of the site's worst offender, and has been since he first appeared on the scene. Again, we'll just have to trust her......sorry, that just doesn't work for me. I think she dishonors Daniel's memory in this, but that might just be me. But again, her batting average is really good.
|Aug-13-18|| ||Big Pawn: You're about to be *unpersoned* by the libs!
Dr Winston OBoogie chessforum (kibitz #161)
They've got you on the banned list!
|Aug-13-18|| ||Keyser Soze: heh heh heh
But I think that it is just his butthurting list. Kind of cowardice isn`t it? A 40 y.old "guy" that cant handle his own problems goes full hysterical, making opposite groups on chessgames and so forth to press the ADM.. Not to mention his hysterical risible/deluded legal threats against the site and members..
Some people can`t stand that kind of rectal pain.. Not the libs thats for sure. heh
|Aug-13-18|| ||thegoodanarchist: <ODF: Even worse, she is the strongest supporter of the site's worst offender, and has been since he first appeared on the scene. >|
I didn't know that.
<OCF> you've been a voice of both concern and restraint in this community since Daniel's passing.
It is appreciated.
|Aug-13-18|| ||thegoodanarchist: This is noteworthy:
<Dr Winston OBoogie: Hi Morf. What tpstar said was evil. One more word out of him and he'll regret it. He's unfit to be a doctor, policeman or a teacher. They're positions of trust, I'd be horrified if I found out my doctor was a racist online troll. He's playing with fire, trust me on that :)>
Dr Winston OBoogie chessforum (kibitz #153)
|Aug-13-18|| ||rogge: <I am fairly certain I never said you were "IQ 85">|
That's wrong, and you're wrong, but I don't care anyway. Search and you'll find.
You asked me another question on Rogoff. I'll say this, you hang out with *some* creepy people. You're one of the more reasonable conservatives (if you define yourself as such) when you're not acting crazy, like on Freeman's page lately, and when you'd like to deport NYP/WP staff to Cuba.
|Aug-13-18|| ||rogge: ...and ganging up on <saffuna>, I might add. Totally unnecessary.|
|Aug-13-18|| ||thegoodanarchist: <rogge: <I am fairly certain I never said you were "IQ 85">|
That's wrong, and you're wrong, but I don't care anyway. Search and you'll find.>
Well, I did, and you are wrong. I was talking about the people you hang out with in real life. My speculation was that you hung out with them because <they> are IQ 85 and so your derision impresses them. They confuse it with intellectual superiority.
However, as English is not your native language I can certainly see how my post could be interpreted your way. And I suppose insulting your friends isn't much better than insulting you.
Here's the quote:
<<rogge> uses derision as a substitute for intellect, because IRL the nitwits he hangs out with think that if you are derisive, you are intellectually superior. They imagine that derision hides their IQs of 85, but that only fools other IQ 85 types.>
FYI, I do that a lot - I make subtle distinctions to see who is paying close attention and who isn't. Rogoff is a game for me, mostly.
<You asked me another question on Rogoff. I'll say this, you hang out with *some* creepy people.>
Everyone who hangs out on Rogoff does so with everyone else. That includes you. We all hang together (pun intended).
What I don't do is try to define alliances, the way <DWOB> and <Nisj> do. The "us versus them" is anathema to me. I have argued with everyone on the page.
<and when you'd like to deport NYP/WP staff to Cuba.> It's a thought experiment. They would return to the USA much more appreciative of the freedoms that conservatives fight to defend from media attack.
<and ganging up on <saffuna>>
It isn't "ganging up". Multiple people have come to the conclusion that he is a liar based on their <own> conversations with him. <Mort> did. <I> did. <Bobster> did.
In fact, when <BP> was the only one calling him a liar, I thought <BP> was full of it.
Trust me, if you argue enough in favor of conservative issues (you won't, but hypothetically, if you did) you will learn it as well.
I know you don't believe it, but I didn't either. Until it happened. <Bobster> didn't either. <Mort> didn't either. <TheFocus> didn't believe, either. The list goes on...
|Aug-13-18|| ||thegoodanarchist: Anyway, <rogge>, I was trying to conjure up a mental image of you holding court with dumb people, impressing them with your derisive comments, since they don't know those aren't strong arguments.|
It wasn't really a nice thing to say. If I offended you, I apologize.
But really, if people can't take the Rogoff heat, they shouldn't be there.
|Aug-13-18|| ||rogge: Believe me, I can take it. Insults from anonymous #1 to anonymous #2 on internet don't bother me at all.|
<It isn't "ganging up". Multiple people have come to the conclusion that he is a liar based on their <own> conversations with him. <Mort> did. <I> did. <Bobster> did.>
Yeah, <the gang>. I could've elaborated, but won't in a public forum.
"Friends", for me that's for real world relationships only.
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 42 OF 42 ·