< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 752 OF 1067 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Nov-22-06 | | Artar1: <RookFile: I just don't see the queen as going to b5.> Ah, my <quick> demonstration was not an attempt to find the perfect, but to illustrate the merit of 28.h3. Some of our participants (not strong players like yourself) were having trouble understanding such a quiet move. |
|
Nov-22-06 | | technical draw: The bookie won't give me 100 to bet on Arno's next move. Could it be cause I owe him $6,370? |
|
Nov-22-06 | | jepflast: What are we planning for 28...Qb5?
That's the reply that most makes us wish we had played 28. b4 (not to bring that up again). |
|
Nov-22-06
 | | Tabanus: <jepflast> Bah, no problem. 28...Qb5 29.b4 |
|
Nov-22-06 | | technical draw: <Tabanus> Poo-pooed...Dismissed something as unimportant. |
|
Nov-22-06
 | | Tabanus: <td> I realized, so I zapped :) |
|
Nov-22-06 | | weisyschwarz: <Tabanus: <jepflast> Bah, no problem. 28...Qb5 29.b4> What about 28...Qb5 29.b4 Rc4? |
|
Nov-22-06 | | jepflast: <Tabanus: <jepflast> Bah, no problem. 28...Qb5 29.b4> I'm listening. But what do you plan after that? All I see is 29...Re2 30. Qf4 Rc2, which is not pretty. |
|
Nov-22-06
 | | Open Defence: and there are no sharks around |
|
Nov-22-06
 | | Tabanus: <jepflast> I have not looked at it at all. I'm just saying we should keep alternatives open. Some moves could be 'good' at high-ply. |
|
Nov-22-06 | | jepflast: Last night I heard mention that there were previous Challenges like this, which I didn't know. Who were the opponents and what happened? Are there any links to those games? |
|
Nov-22-06 | | jepflast: <Tabanus: <jepflast> I have not looked at it at all. I'm just saying we should keep alternatives open. Some moves could be 'good' at high-ply.> Not to worry. At this point I feel that 28...Qb5 is correctly answered by 29. R1f2! so we can proceed with the plan to build a fortress while Black can do nothing. |
|
Nov-22-06 | | RookFile: "We are the world...."
"We are the children....."
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/ches... |
|
Nov-22-06
 | | Tabanus: <jepflast> OK. <RV> also has 29.fxg6 |
|
Nov-22-06 | | technical draw: The "world" has lost 4 drew 2 and won 0. |
|
Nov-22-06 | | weisyschwarz: ...it's true we can make a better game, just you and me. |
|
Nov-22-06 | | jepflast: <RookFile: "We are the world...."
"We are the children....."
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/ches...;
Were all these games really played here, and only here, on chessgames.com? Why is one called "tv corr"? |
|
Nov-22-06 | | Karpova: <jepflast> no, the game against GMAN is the first one ever to be played here. |
|
Nov-22-06 | | RookFile: I think we're playing in the first such much here at chessgames, aren't we? |
|
Nov-22-06 | | RonB52734: <jepflast> no, those games were not played here. If you read the kibitzing in those games, or search on google, you can find out the details. |
|
Nov-22-06 | | Karpova: <jepflast: Why is one called "tv corr"?> Here's coverage of the game you are referring to:
http://www.chessbase.com/searchresu... |
|
Nov-22-06 | | GufeldStudent: World was winning against Kostenuik. Rg1 instead of Qxa6 would have won. Lesson: Remember Intermezzo's!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Besides, this is really AN vs. Chessgames.com members. We kick the worlds butt. |
|
Nov-22-06 | | weisyschwarz: Hmmm. Game idea:
Chessbase.com members vs. Chessgames.com members. |
|
Nov-22-06
 | | WannaBe: Would never work, they'd be too busy in-arguing amongst themselves. |
|
Nov-22-06 | | isemeria: <jepflast: Were all these games really played here, and only here, on chessgames.com? Why is one called "tv corr"?> The World vs. Karpov, 1996 was not a correspondence game. See my comment on that game's kibitzing. |
|
 |
 |
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 752 OF 1067 ·
Later Kibitzing> |