chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

🏆
TOURNAMENT STANDINGS
New York Open Tournament

Eric Lobron7.5/9(+6 -0 =3)[games]
Jaan Ehlvest7/9(+6 -1 =2)[games]
Aleksandr Shneider7/9(+5 -0 =4)[games]
John Fedorowicz7/9(+6 -1 =2)[games]
Igor Ivanov7/9(+6 -1 =2)[games]
Alonso Zapata7/9(+6 -1 =2)[games]
Mikhail Braude7/9(+5 -0 =4)[games]
Maxim Dlugy6.5/9(+6 -2 =1)[games]
Sergey Kudrin6.5/9(+5 -1 =3)[games]
Patrick Wolff6.5/9(+5 -1 =3)[games]
Gregory Kaidanov6.5/9(+5 -1 =3)[games]
Semon Palatnik6.5/9(+5 -1 =3)[games]
Aleksander Wojtkiewicz6.5/9(+4 -0 =5)[games]
Ilya Gurevich6.5/9(+6 -2 =1)[games]
Tom Wedberg6.5/9(+4 -0 =5)[games]
Benjamin Finegold6.5/9(+5 -1 =3)[games]
Gennadi Zaichik6.5/9(+5 -1 =3)[games]
Alex Yermolinsky6/9(+4 -1 =4)[games]
Alexander Ivanov6/9(+5 -2 =2)[games]
Vladislav Fedorov6/9(+4 -1 =4)[games]
Lev Alburt6/9(+4 -1 =4)[games]
Kamran Shirazi6/9(+6 -3 =0)[games]
Jon Arnason6/9(+4 -1 =4)[games]
Richard Wessman6/9(+5 -2 =2)[games]
Yakov Nesterov6/9(+4 -1 =4)[games]
Valerij Kuksov6/9(+5 -2 =2)[games]
Mikhail Zlotnikov6/9(+5 -2 =2)[games]
Mark Meeres6/9(+5 -2 =2)[games]
David A Arnett6/9(+5 -2 =2)[games]
Stephen Sandager6/9(+5 -2 =2)[games]
Roman Dzindzichashvili5.5/9(+4 -2 =3)[games]
Igor Khmelnitsky5.5/9(+4 -2 =3)[games]
* (135 players total; 103 players not shown. Click here for longer list.)

Chessgames.com Chess Event Description
New York Open (1992)

Crosstable: http://www.uschess.org/msa/XtblMain....

 page 11 of 11; games 251-256 of 256  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
251. A Cherniack vs B Finegold  0-1271992New York OpenD06 Queen's Gambit Declined
252. G Sagalchik vs S Garber  1-0311992New York OpenE77 King's Indian
253. T Southam vs T Wedberg  ½-½161992New York OpenE43 Nimzo-Indian, Fischer Variation
254. M L Wong vs A Soltis  0-1361992New York OpenB27 Sicilian
255. G Small vs Ehlvest  0-1341992New York OpenE77 King's Indian
256. A Soltis vs Dlugy ½-½191992New York OpenB56 Sicilian
 page 11 of 11; games 251-256 of 256  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  

Kibitzer's Corner
Oct-09-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  Stonehenge: The following games do *not* belong to this tournament: (other databases do have them as from the New York Open), maybe there are more:

New York (1992).

Oct-09-22  stone free or die: <stone> (the original btw) -

How did you come to exclude those games?

I assume you weeded them out from what <CG> included by using the USCF xtab and noting non-pairings.

Is that correct?

.

Oct-09-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  Stonehenge: Yup, correct.
Oct-10-22  Granny O Doul: A note on lingo: "Rapids", short for "rapid transit chess", is what both the Manhattan (rest in passing) and the Marshall Chess clubs have, for decades, called their regular blitz action. The time controls have varied, from ten seconds per move in the old, old days, to g/7, to g/5, to, I think, 3/2 in modern times. I personally use the word "rapids" to denote that it took place in a tournament, while "blitz" is just fast chess; maybe not a tournament and maybe not equal time for each player.

Of the two best-represented players in the not-the-New York Open games in Stonehenge's link, Henley has long been a contributor of rapids games to various chess publications, while Zilbermintz has been as dutiful preserving his blitz games, especially in the gambit openings he favors.

Oct-10-22  stone free or die: Thanks for the confirmation <stone>.

* * * * *

<Granny> weren't the original transit games played without every board having a clock?

I thought there was a style of rapid game where there was a referee calling out the time throughout the game. The players had to move at these regular intervals.

This allowed a large number of simultaneous rapid games to be played when there weren't enough clocks to go around.

Am I mistaken in this impression?

.

Oct-11-22  ghost5: Yes, rapid transit has been around for some time (e.g. https://spectatorarchive.library.co...). Reuben Fine was fearsome at 10 second/move rapid transit, which was the preferred format for early US Speed Championships, IIRC. I'd have to dig through the old Chess Life/Chess Review PDFs for specific citations. I suspect older clocks were not meant to take the pounding of blitz play, unlike the BHB models we used. Those things were incredibly robust.
Jul-04-23  Granny O Doul: Before my time but I believe they used clocks with a bell that rang after ten seconds, and maybe another bell rang after three more seconds? I understand that some players regularly skated very close to the edge, knowing the referees were reluctant to forfeit on border-line calls.

Later, after five-minute chess had taken over, they did manufacture special clocks just for blitz, on which the hand pointed straight down at the start of a five-minute game, and so moved at six times the speed of a regular clock. As I remember, these clocks were also about six times as likely to break.

Jul-04-23
Premium Chessgames Member
  paulalbert: Many years ago I played at the Manhattan in a rapid transit tournament. They had a loud buzzer that sounded every ten seconds. It sometimes became confusing when players moved well before the 10 second buzzer went off, particularly in the opening stage when both players banged out the first few moves.

I still have my original mechanical chess clock ( bought about 70 years ago ) that had an opening for a small battery. It could be set so a buzzer went off either at 5 seconds or 10 seconds intervals for rapid transit play.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific tournament only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC