chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

🏆 Hastings 1967/68

Chessgames.com Chess Event Description
The 43rd Hastings Christmas Chess Festival was held at the end of the year 1967. Ten grandmasters and masters were invited to compete in a round robin format at the premier event. The notable participants of this edition included Soviet grandmasters Leonid Stein and Alexey Suetin, World Junior Champion Julio Kaplan, Czechoslovakian grandmaster Vlastimil Hort, Romanian grandmaster Florin Gheorghiu, and British junior master Raymond Keene. The final saw a four way tie for first place among Hort, Gheorghiu, St ... [more]

Player: William Hartston

 page 1 of 1; 9 games  PGN Download 
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. W Hartston vs M Basman  1-0671967Hastings 1967/68B07 Pirc
2. W Hartston vs Keene  ½-½121967Hastings 1967/68B06 Robatsch
3. A Whiteley vs W Hartston  ½-½211967Hastings 1967/68D76 Neo-Grunfeld, 6.cd Nxd5, 7.O-O Nb6
4. W Hartston vs Gheorghiu  ½-½321967Hastings 1967/68B04 Alekhine's Defense, Modern
5. P Ostojic vs W Hartston 1-0501967Hastings 1967/68B89 Sicilian
6. W Hartston vs Suetin  0-1721968Hastings 1967/68B89 Sicilian
7. Stein vs W Hartston 1-0351968Hastings 1967/68A34 English, Symmetrical
8. W Hartston vs J Kaplan  ½-½431968Hastings 1967/68C82 Ruy Lopez, Open
9. Hort vs W Hartston 1-0391968Hastings 1967/68D26 Queen's Gambit Accepted
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Hartston wins | Hartston loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
Apr-06-18  Cibator: One of the more notorious Hastings tournaments. The four-way tie for first place was deliberately engineered so as to share the prize-money equally among the grandmasters.

The root of the trouble was a prize fund that was on the thin side to begin with, and too skewed in its distribution, as the table below makes clear:

1st - UKP250
2nd - UKP100
3rd - UKP50
4th - UKP25

(These sums seem derisory nowadays, but weren't quite that bad in 1968, when UKP25 was a goodish week's salary.)

CHESS magazine hit the nail on the head with its comment: "Far too steep a descent. We can recall no other tournament where fourth prize was only one-tenth of first." They went on to remark that the grandmasters weren't going to allow the indignity of one their number going home with only UKP25. Hence the "obviously contrived" final result.

Apr-06-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: I read about this in one of Baruch Wood's columns. I'll try and dig it up.
Jul-05-25
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: Donner in 'The King' in an article headed; 'Draw Conspiracy' (written in December 1968) said he spoke to all four of the players involved and each one said there was no fix. He added none of them were invited back for the 1968/69 event.

Comments from all four merged into Hastings had become boring no longer inspiring great deeds. It is small calibre, only 10 contestants, the prizes are modest and the revolting English practice of beginning play at 9.00 am is maintained.

"Superstition has a long life among the island dwellers and they believe that a man is at his brightest in the morning."

Staying on the subject of short draws Donner gives a 14 move draw v Damjanovic. He is not too kind about the tournament (' a lousy tournament - small prizes, never a day off) so he does not give the exact date or venue.

Here Damjanovic played 14.Nd5.


click for larger view

And then offered a shocked Donner a draw adding there was a sci-fi film he wanted to go and see. Donner agreed.
He then goes onto mention that 14.Nd5 appeared in a couple opening books from that period judging the move 14.Nd5 as unclear.

Jul-06-25  FM David H. Levin: If the pairings would have had the four ultimate winners of this tournament facing only each other in the last three rounds, then meaningful collusion among them would seem feasible. But given that Stein's last game against one of the co-winners was in round 6 and gave him 3.5/6, assurance of the four-way tie would have required knowing that Stein would score 2.5 in his last three games. Thus, the alleged collusion would have had to involve other players also.

The skewed prize fund, if anything, gave incentive to contrive a sole winner. Had Suetin and Gheorghiu arranged for their last-round matchup to be decisive with the stipulation that they would split the anticipated first prize, each would have won 125 pounds rather than the ~107 pounds resulting from the four-way tie.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific tournament only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC