chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Alexander Kotov vs David Bronstein
Zuerich Candidates (1953), Zurich SUI, rd 9, Sep-13
King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation. Classical Fianchetto (E67)  ·  1/2-1/2

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Annotations by Stockfish (Computer).      [35436 more games annotated by Stockfish]

explore this opening
find similar games 18 more Kotov/Bronstein games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The tournament is found above the game. For the newest chess events, this information may be a link which takes you to the tournament page which includes other games, a crosstable, discussion, etc.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

THIS IS A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE.   [CLICK HERE] FOR ORIGINAL.

Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-10-03  Rookpawn: Bronstein wrote that a possible variation for White was: 38. Rcb1 Rxb7 39. axb7 Rb8 40. Ra8 Qd8 41. Bxg5 f6 42. Rxb8 Qxb8 43. Be3 Bc8 44.Ba7 Qxb7 45. Rxb7 Bxb7 46. Bb8.
Oct-10-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: The standard play was 9..Nc5 and 10..a5; 9..a6 was a bit unusual. Bronstein did not follow through with 11..b5 because after 12 cxb..axb 13 Nb4 White is better. 15 a4 seems odd positionally as after 15..a5! it is much more difficult for White to achieve the c5 break. Bronstein was critical of 24..Ndf6 recommending 24..Nc5 instead. 34 Qxb7 would have been met by 34..Nxg3 35 fxg..Bxe3 36 Bxe3..Qf1+ 37 Kh2..Kg7. 37 a6 was forced because after 37 Qc6..g5 White would have been lost. Bronstein should have taken the draw with 37..Rxb7 38 axb..Rb8 39 Ra8..Qd8 40 Rc8!..Rxc8 41 Rxc8..Qxc8 42 bxc..Bxc8. Kotov missed the winning continuation 38 Rcb1!..Re8 39 a7..Kh7 40 Qc6 which leads to a gain of a tempo over the game continuation. Bronstein missed 54..Qd3 55 Ne3..Qd2+ winning and then again a move later when 55..Kg5 would also have led to a win.
Aug-08-21  Bycotron: After black's 16th move, he has made 4 rook moves and his rooks sit on the same squares as required by zero moves.

After black's 20th move, he has moved his knights 6 times and they stand on squares they could have reached in 2 moves, and in fact after all this hopping they're right back on the same squares they were on after black's 6th move.

8 wasted tempi in 20 moves and a rich, beautiful game followed. Everything I know about chess is a lie.

Mar-22-25
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: Vol. I of Najdorf's <15 Aspirantes al Titulo Mundial> just arrived so I unwrapped it, pulled down Bronstein's book, and deployed Stockfish so I could take a look at this wild and wonderful game, which as <Bycotron> said is apt to make you think everything you know about chess is a lie.

SF sees all sorts of interesting things throughout, and so do Najdorf and Bronstein, but I'll focus on the game starting here:


click for larger view

...where both sides are breaking through on "their" side of the board in classic King's Indian fashion.

Bronstein thinks Kotov's 34.Ng4 is best, but Najdorf thinks it's time to pull the queen back for defense with 34.Qc4. SF agrees with Najdorf. After the pretty much forced 34....Bxg4 35.Bxh6 Rfc8 36.Qxb7 Rcb8 37.a6!


click for larger view

Bronstein and Najdorf give the identical drawing variation starting with 37....Rxb7 38.ab Rb8 40.Ra8 Qd6 41.Rc8! Rxc8 42.Rxc8 Bxc8 43.b8/Q. Bronstein says it's what he should have played, Najdorf thinks Bronstein's 37....g5 is correct, because Bronstein thinks he worse and Najdorf thinks he's better! Again the engine sides with Najdorf.

It all comes down to how to evaluate the position after Bronstein's beautiful suggestion (which Najdorf misses) after 37....g5, namely 38.Rcb1!, and if 38....Rxb7 39.ab Rb8 40.Ra8 Qd8 41.Bxg5! White wins, just as Bronstein says. But (unlike Bronstein), the engine thinks Black is slightly-better-than-OK after 38....Re8 39.a7, and, instead of Bronstein's 39....Kh7 (which gets Black into deep trouble after 40.Bxg5!! Qxg5 41.Qxf7+ Qg7 42.Qxg7+ Kxg7 43.Rb8+ Kg6 44.Rab1 and the pawn on a7 is worth far more than the piece), the engine finds 39....Qxh6! 40.Qxa8! Rxa8 41.Rb8+ Qf8 42.Rxf8+ Kxf8 43.f3 Bc8 and Black is a little better, though a draw is likely.

After Kotov's 38.Qxb8+?, however, White is losing. But the game is still very hard to win. A key moment comes after 43.Rbb7.


click for larger view

Najdorf thinks 43....Kg6 is a mistake, Bronstein doesn't mention it, but they both miss the engine's 43....Qg6!!, which wins after 44.f3 Bxf3! 45.Nxf3 Qxe4 46.Rxf7 Qe3+ 47.Kf1 Nxg3+ 48.Kg2 Nh5. I think this is unfair and no human can be expected to see this, even after an adjournment. But a bigger miss by Bronstein, which Najdorf points out, comes on move 45: ...Nxg3! 46.Rxc8 Qf4! with all sorts of forks and mates in the offing.

Apart from noting that 47.Rxf7 can be met by ...Bd7, Najdorf gives the rest of the game without comment, but as Bronstein was aware, there was a lot going on, and he missed several chances to win. But he also missed some of White's chances to draw, because the engine finds some -- again, very unfair -- fortresses. I'll mention just one.

Bronstein quite naturally thinks that Black is winning after 55....Kg5 56.Rcg7+ Kf4 57.Ng2+ Kxe4 58.Rxh6 Qf3+, but the engine coolly spits out 59.Kg1 g3 60.Rxg3!! Qxg3 61.Rxd6 Qc3 62.Rg6 Kxd5 63.Kh2 e4 64.Rg3


click for larger view

...and that pawn ain't never getting anywhere.

Very happy with my new book, my old book, and my engine.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC