chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Herman Pilnik vs Bobby Fischer
Mar del Plata (1959), Mar del Plata ARG, rd 10, Apr-03
Sicilian Defense: Najdorf. Opocensky Variation Traditional Line (B92)  ·  0-1

8
7
6
5
4
3
2
a
1
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
White to move.
ANALYSIS [x]
Notes by Stockfish 9 v010218 (minimum 6s/ply)10...Nbd7 was played in L Hill vs Fischer, 1957 (0-1) 11.f4 exf4 12.Rxf4 Nc6 13.Qd2 Ne5 14.Nd4 Rad8 15.Nf5 d5 = +0.35 (17 ply)= -0.44 (24 ply) after 11...b5 12.a3 Nbd7 13.f4 Nb6 14.Nd2 exf4 15.Bxf4 Na4 better is 12.f4 b5 13.a3 Nb6 14.Nd2 exf4 15.Rxf4 Na4 16.Nxa4 bxa4 = +0.01 (23 ply) ⩱ -0.67 (21 ply)better is 13.Qf2 b4 14.Nd5 Bxd5 15.exd5 Qxc2 16.Bd3 Qc7 17.Rc1 Qd8 = -0.42 (22 ply)better is 13...b4 14.Nd5 Bxd5 15.exd5 Nb6 16.Bxb6 Qxb6+ 17.Kh1 a5 ⩱ -1.10 (26 ply) 14.Bxb6 Qxb6+ 15.Qf2 Qxf2+ 16.Kxf2 Rfc8 17.a3 g6 18.g3 ⩱ -0.57 (24 ply) 14...Nc4 15.Bxc4 bxc4 16.Bb6 Qc8 17.Na5 Nd7 18.Na4 Rb8 ⩱ -1.49 (23 ply)better is 15.Rb1 b4 16.Bxb6 Rxb6 17.Nd5 Nxd5 18.exd5 Bd7 19.c4 ⩱ -0.61 (20 ply) ⩱ -1.15 (20 ply) 18...Rbb8 19.c4 exf4 20.cxb5 axb5 21.Qxf4 Bf6 22.Bd3 ⩱ -1.17 (21 ply)better is 19.fxe5 Bxe5 20.c3 b4 21.c4 Rbb8 22.Bd3 g6 23.Re2 a5 = -0.31 (24 ply)better is 19...e4 20.Qe3 Re8 21.Rc1 Rbb8 22.c4 bxc4 23.Rxc4 Qb6 ⩱ -0.83 (22 ply)= -0.08 (25 ply)better is 22.Bf3 Rbe8 23.Nc6 Bf6 24.Rdd1 Bg5 25.Rde1 f5 26.Nd4 Re5 = 0.00 (24 ply)better is 22...Rbe8 23.Rdd1 Re7 24.Bf3 Bxd4 25.Rxd4 Rfe8 26.Re4 ⩱ -0.57 (22 ply)better is 23.Bf3 Rbe8 24.Nc6 Bg7 25.Re2 f5 26.Rfe1 Be5 27.Rd2 Bf6 = 0.00 (23 ply) ⩱ -0.58 (23 ply)better is 29.Ra2 Rb2 30.Rxb2 Bxb2 31.Bb5 Rxa3 32.Ne7+ Kf8 33.Nxg6+ = -0.25 (23 ply) ⩱ -0.97 (23 ply)better is 32.Bc4 Rc2 33.d6 Rxc4 34.Rxc4 Bd3 35.Rc6 Bxf1 36.d7 Ba6 ⩱ -0.81 (26 ply) ⩱ -1.35 (24 ply)better is 34.Re1 e4 35.Bg2 Rd8 36.Re7 Rxd5 37.Bxe4 Bxe4+ 38.R1xe4 ⩱ -1.15 (24 ply) ∓ -1.82 (25 ply) 37.Re8+ Kg7 38.Re3 Be4 39.Rxe4 Rxf3 40.Kg1 Rxa3 41.Rec4 ⩱ -1.50 (34 ply)-+ -3.05 (30 ply)41.Rf4 Bd5 42.Kg1 Rxf3 43.Rd4 Be6 44.Kg2 Rxa3 45.g5 Ra2+ -+ -3.52 (26 ply)0-1

rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1
FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 75 times; par: 63 [what's this?]

Annotations by Stockfish (Computer).      [35437 more games annotated by Stockfish]

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more Pilnik/Fischer game
sac: 37...Rxf3 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You should register a free account to activate some of Chessgames.com's coolest and most powerful features.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

THIS IS A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE.   [CLICK HERE] FOR ORIGINAL.

Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-21-05  lopium: What if 27.Nc6xRb8?
I don't see how can black makes a Queen.
So it permit an advantage?
Mar-21-05  maoam: <lopium>

After 27.Nxb8 I think Qxf2 28.Rxf2 a2 29.Nxd7 a1=Q is better for Black.

Jan-27-06  Jim Bartle: 27, Nxf8 Qxf2 28. Rxf2 a2 followed by ....Af5
Nov-08-07  sallom89: great pinning!
Apr-15-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: 10 f3 is not even mentioned in Nunn's book on the Najdorf though, at the time of this game, it was one of the standard moves. Nowadays, 10 Qd2, 10 f4 and 10 Nd5 are the most popular options. Fischer felt that 14 Bxb6 was necessary because black could have obtained an advantage after 14 Qf2 with 14..Nc4 15 Bxc4..bxc 16 Bb6..Qc8
17 Na5..Nd7!. 27 Nxb8 would have failed to 27..Qxf2 28 Rxf2..a2 29 Rf1..Bf5 30 Rcc1..Rxb8. Fischer was critical of 29 Nxe5? recommending 29 Ra2..Rb2 30 Rxb2..Bxb2 31 Bb5! (with the idea of Ne7+) with a probable draw. 36 Re7 would have allowed white to defend longer.
Dec-07-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  kingscrusher: I have video annotated this game which is one of Fischer's My 60 memorable games:

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=NulaU...

Dec-07-08  M.D. Wilson: Nice one.
Mar-07-09  outplayer: 25.axb4 Rxb4 26.b3 Bxd4 27.Rxd4 Rxb3=
Jun-03-09  birthtimes: 27. Nxf8 Qxf2 28. Rxf2 a2 29. Rf1 Bf5 30. Rcc1 Rxb8
Jul-23-09  nrjnj: [-2.75: 37.Re8+ Kg7 38. Rb7 Rd2 39. Re3 Be4 40. Rxe4 Rxf3 41. Re1 Rff2 42. h3 Rf3 43. h4 Rh3+ 44. Kg1 Rxh4 45. Rb4 Rhh2 46. Re7 -1.12/17]
Jul-25-10  tentsewang: I remember Fischer once said Najdorf chastised him for missing a very good move somewhere in the end, though Fischer was clearly winning. What a fascinating game!! by young Fischer.
Aug-29-12  TheFocus: This is game 4 in Fischer's <My 60 Memorable Games>.
Jul-21-13  talwnbe4: Here the computer program Fruit 2.2.1 finds 35..e5-e4 preferable to Fischer's 35.. Rxd6 after a few seconds of thought. The point being 36. Bxe4 Rb1 36. Rxb1 ? Bxe4+ followed by picking the rook off on b1.
Apr-03-15  Howard: Let me took a closer look at 35...e4. That was around the time where Najdorf did indeed spot a quicker win which Fischer had apparently overlooked.
Apr-04-15  Howard: Yes, 35...e4 was the move that Najdorf "chided" Fischer for missing. Just looked it up last night.
Jul-14-15  victor antoni: ganar es ganar ok Najdorf..
Sep-19-16  Howard: If I remember correctly, however, Fischer doesn't really specify where Pilnik went wrong in this game.
Sep-19-16  ughaibu: Presumably there was a point beyond which Fischer no longer asserted that Pilnik could do something "with a bind".
May-29-18  Toribio3: Pin is mightier than a sword!
Dec-12-18  SpiritedReposte: Very straight forward play from fischer. <35. ...e4!> would have been a nice find to wrap up.
Apr-23-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: In Fischer's 60, Game Two he faulted Larsen for not chopping a Bishop with a Knight. In this game (G4) he faults himself for allowing Pilnik to exchange a Bishop for a Knight on b6.

No wonder this book went over my head in the early days. Which is better Bob, a Knight or a Bishop? (although TBH I cannot recall going over this one, though I did, I have notes scribbled on it in the margin of my 1969 edition.)

Pilnik, according to Bobby was playing for a draw and Bobby was doing his best to keep some tension in the game.

Pilnik seems to get sucked into thinking he can maybe win this. Allowing the passer on d6 and knowing it is not a winner is good chess. And surely the active White Rooks will at least get a blind swine 7th rank draw. No. Bobby had looked deeper.

The book ends with a variation and a note; '...cooks White's goose'

Did Fischer really write that smultz? That and other cliché’s (...'for the want of a nail the battle was lost.' [Game 2]) reek of Evans or Lombardy. (see the latter's 'Snatched Opportunities' you could easily be forgiven apart from the personal anecdotes from Fischer that this was the same guy who noted up M60. They have a similar ring to them.)

And I wonder how the foreign translators handled that Game 4 note; '...cooks White's goose'

'After the game white ate a cooked bird.'

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC