chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Max Marchand vs Jose Raul Capablanca
Hastings (1919), Hastings ENG, rd 2, Aug-12
Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation (C48)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Annotations by Stockfish (Computer).      [35434 more games annotated by Stockfish]

explore this opening
find similar games 1,251 more games of Capablanca
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you missed a Game of the Day, you can review the last year of games at our Game of the Day Archive.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

THIS IS A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE.   [CLICK HERE] FOR ORIGINAL.

Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-07-03  Lawrence: Marchand played a good game here and must have lost on time. This was the tournament where Capa won 10 of his 11 games and drew the other. (The really great Russian and German players were not present.)
Dec-08-03  dinoamascual: i do not understand. why did marchand lose? on time? so few moves yet so much time wasted?
Dec-09-03
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessical: <Dinoamascual> Perhaps Marchand resigned through an aggravated fear of Capablanca's prowess. In the same tournament two rounds later, Sir George Thomas resigned with a potentially won endgame mistaking a flashy but careless move of Capablanca's for a winning one. Capablanca vs George Alan Thomas, 1919
Dec-09-03  Calli: Yes, but Thomas and Capablanca simply overlooked a move. This resignation is somewhat mysterious. I can check a book or two to see if a reason is mentioned.
Dec-10-03  Resignation Trap: According to my source, it was indeed a loss on time.
Dec-10-03  Calli: <RT> Hard to imagine a 19 move time loss, but maybe Marchand arrived late for the game and much of his time had already elapsed.
Dec-10-03  Resignation Trap: Move 19? How??

According to my source (Weltgeschichte des Schachs #14 Capablanca), "Weiss uberschritt die Zeit, da er ubersah, das fur die erste Stunde 20 Zuge vorgeschrieben waren".

In other words, he lost on move 19 because the tournament had the unusual time control of 20 moves in the first hour. Fur

Dec-10-03  Calli: Viel Dank!
Sep-24-04  WMD: "At his 20th move M.Marchand hesitated too long as to which pawn to capture a bishop with, and exceeded his time limit by two minutes. Capablanca quite rightly clamed the game, but it appears M. Marchand was under the impression that he was only bound to complete 40 moves in two hours.

"In the best sporting spirit possible Capablanca offered to play the game out in the circumstances if the committee agreed and the other players did not object. But the rules were so explicit that 20 moves must be completed in the first hour that the committee had no option in the matter. Everyone sympathised with M. Marchand for his unfortunate error, and he certainly had none the worst of the position at the time." (The Times, quoted in QCH, 2/1999)

Sep-25-04  Lawrence: <WMD>, thanks for finding that: it certainly reflects honour on Capa's fair-mindedness even if the committee couldn't accept his offer.
Jul-12-06  PaulKeres: Thanks <Resignation Trap>, and <WMD>, it is very useful to know that this was a loss over time, rather than a resignation. Great pity though, would have been interesting to see how the game would have panned out.
Dec-15-08  YoungEd: I second thanks for the interesting story. White certainly didn't look much worse at the break-off point. Too bad the game ended that way!

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC