chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Walter Veitch vs Jonathan Penrose
British Championship (1950), Buxton ENG, rd 10, Aug-31
Indian Game: Anti-Nimzo-Indian (E10)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Annotations by Stockfish (Computer).      [35435 more games annotated by Stockfish]

explore this opening
find similar games 629 more games of J Penrose
sac: 7...Bxf2+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you find a mistake in the database, use the correction form. There is a link at the bottom that reads "Spot an error? Please suggest your correction..." Avoid posting corrections in the kibitzing area.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

THIS IS A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE.   [CLICK HERE] FOR ORIGINAL.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jan-06-04  Lawrence: strobane and Catfriend, after 8.♔f1 Junior 8 prefers the bugout route 8.....♗c5 9.♕c2 eval -1.9, after 8.♔f1 ♘g4 comes 9.♕a4+ ♗d7 10.♕a3 ♘a6 eval -1.73 Black's ahead in both cases but hasn't won the game yet.
Jan-06-04  kevin86: If seen this type of problem thousands of times;the trick to this one is trapping the white queen on the queenside-the rest is cut and dried

8 ♔f1 ♘e3+ forks king and queen and 8 ♔g1 ♕b6+ forces mate

Jan-06-04  trguitar: White's moves 6. dxc5? and 7. Bg2?? killed him. If he'd played 7. Qa4+, he still would have been ok, though, I think.
Jan-06-04  patzer2: <ossolinskm> If White had played the more popular 5. Bg2, it would have been a Catalan, Open variation. As it is with the dubious 5. Nbd2?! (or maybe 5. Nbd2!? is interesting), it's hard to classify. Perhaps that's why ChessGames.Com has it as a miscellaneous Queen's Pawn Game.
Jan-06-04  patzer2: Maybe 5. Nbd2!? is not as bad as I first thought, but it does give Black a slight advantage with best play. Fritz 8 did a little analysis and found Black gets a slightly better position after 5...Qd5 or 5...b5 or 5...c5 (as in the game).

Better are the two most popular options <5. Bg2> (see two links above for sample games) or <5. Qa4+> as in Ulf Andersson vs V Milov, 1997

Jan-06-04  patzer2: <trguitar> <White's moves 6. dxc5? and 7. Bg2?? killed him> I think you are essentially correct. I don't know know if I agree that 6. dxc5 deserves a (?)as a bad move, but I will agree it was probably not the best option here.

If White had played <6. Nxc4> instead he could have survived and kept Black's advantage to a slight one with good chances of equalizing.

You are correct that <7.Qa4+!> would have kept White alive, though Black may have had a slightly better position after 7. Qa4+ Bd7 8. Qxc4 Qb6 9. e3 Bc6 10. a3 Nbd7.

Jan-06-04  Lawrence: kevin86, how do you manage to get your Knight from f6 to e3 in one mighty stride like that?
Jan-06-04  Shadout Mapes: I think kevin86 simply accidentily typed 8 instead of 9.

I saw the combination, and guessed that was it because after the queen moves black grabs the bishop, but I didn't see that the queen was trapped.

Jan-07-04  tarami: very pretty. Such a keen eye and keen mind! Easy to miss such a scenario, if at all noticeable... After Ng4--- forces mate if Kg1, whereas Kf1 or Ke1 snares the queen on the OTHER SIDE of the board.. Penrose must have very good peripheral vision!
Jan-07-04  Lawrence: kevin86, Shadout Mapes and tarami, I must repeat what I said yesterday: 8.♔f1 ♘g4 9.♕a4+ ♗d7 10.♕a3 ♘a6. There is no mate and the Queen does not get trapped.
Aug-08-10  JimmyVermeer: <patzer2>, Viswanathan Anand would agree with you about 5 Bg2. He played it 3 times against Topalov in the 2010 World Championship match, winning twice and drawing once with it.

By the way, I am curious what it means when chessgames.com gives the location of the game as "It". I used to think it stood for Interzonal Tournament, but I looked up some information on interzonal tournaments and couldn't find any players with these names.

Aug-08-10  ughaibu: I think it was the British championship, and the year looks wrong.
Dec-10-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  GrahamClayton: <ughaibu>I think it was the British championship, and the year looks wrong

<ughaibu>,
This game was played in Round 9 of the 1950 British Championship at Buxton.

Dec-10-11  ughaibu: Okay, thanks.
Nov-23-13  Nosnibor: <GrahamClayton> This game was actually played in round 10 of the 1950 British Championship at Buxton. In round 9 Veitch beat Golombek in a very nice game playing a Gruenfeld!He finished 7th equal with Barden and A.R.B Thomas gaining 6.5 points from 11 games,ahead of Abrahams,Golombek,Phillips,Berger,Winter,Fazekas- et al
May-23-24  King.Arthur.Brazil: Seems trivial: 7...Bxf2+ 8. Kxf2 Ng4+ etc.
May-23-24  Allderdice83: Took a while to figure out how to win. 7 ... Bxf2+ is obvious, and,9. Kg1 Qb6+ leads to mate, while 9. Kf1 Ne3+ loses the queen straight out. The key is that 9. Ke1 also loses the queen; she has no safe place to go where she isn't forked with the king.

Gonna have to remember this opening trap, especially if I try playing the Nimzo-Indian again.

May-23-24  lentil: I saw the attack pretty quickly, but thought that 10. ... Bd7 was the closure of the trap. I missed BOTH that W had 11 Qa3 AND that B then had ... Nc2+. (My miss of 11 Qa3 is yet another instance of what I call the 'phantom piece', where in my vision, a piece remains on its original square after I [mentally] move it. Here, that piece was the B/c5).
May-23-24
Premium Chessgames Member
  takebackok: Monday like easy, took me awhile to see the queen was toast though.
May-23-24  mel gibson: I saw that but Stockfish 16.1 declines the Bishop:

7. .. Bxf2+

Bxf2+ (7. .. Bxf2+ (1. ... Bxf2+ 2.Kf1 0-0 3.Qc2 Bc5 4.Nxc4 Nc6 5.Nce5 Bb6 6.Nxc6 bxc6 7.a4 h6 8.a5 Bxa5 9.Ne5 Bb6 10.Ra3 Bb7 11.Bf4 Nd5 12.Bf3 Qc7 13.h4 Nxf4 14.gxf4 Bd4) +3.24/43 356

score for Black +3.24 depth 43.

if I force SF to accept the Bishop as per the game:

8. Kxf2 Ng4+

Ng4+ (8. .. Ng4+ (1. ... Ng4+ 2.Ke1 Ne3 3.Qa4+ Bd7 4.Qxc4 Nxc4 5.Nxc4 0-0 6.Bg5 f6 7.Be3 Bc6 8.Kf2 Na6 9.Rhd1 Qe7 10.Rac1 Rfd8 11.Ncd2 e5 12.Bh3 Bd7 13.Bg2 Rac8 14.Nh4 Be6 ) +4.99/45 382)

score for Black +4.99 depth 45.

May-23-24  stacase: Knights are like a double pendulum (Pandemonium?). It's difficult to see how much damage they will do in three moves.
May-23-24  TheaN: I think nobody today has issues finding the starting move, <7....Bxf2+>. White can decline, 8.Kf1, but then Black won the critical Pf2 and White's a mess. Black should be wary though that retreating (8....Bc5 ∓) or castling (8....O-O ∓) are key to prevent a counterattack: 8....Ng4? is a mistake after 9.Qa4+ Bd7 10.Qa3= and Black should be careful to not lose a piece.

The point is not that 7....Bxf2+ 8.Kf1 is objectively best, but that White can't play <8.Kxf2>: <8....Ng4+ 9.Ke1> Kg1 is #3 after Qb6+ and Kf1 Ne3+ -+ <9....Ne3>:


click for larger view

Hitting an almost trapped queen and the bishop on g2. It seems though White has a zwischenschach with <10.Qa4+>, but <10....Bd7 -+> traps the queen anyway. The only free squares are a3 and b4, which run into Nc2+.

May-23-24  TheaN: As a Catalan player, the main issue here is 5.Nbd2. The knight should be on c3: Black should play 5....b5 ⩱ as the knight isn't hitting b5 and play into the standard structures of the Catalan Accepted.

5....c5=, on the other hand, is a cheap attempt to get early initiative, White should play 6.Nxc4= here and now to get the knight off that awful d2 square, 6.dxc5? ⩱ makes no sense conceptually and that shows as 7.Bg2? ∓ borderline loses. Good pattern to know though, regardless of the fact I don't see myself play into this.

May-23-24
Premium Chessgames Member
  chrisowen: I q up yes its het Bxf2+ afc pick doh its axiom juggle its acclaim map Bxf2+ over!
Mar-03-25
Premium Chessgames Member
  kingscrusher: Cute game - very good example of a sacrifice targeting a king soft spot.
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC